Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/811,119

MODULAR HANDGUN GRIP

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Aug 21, 2023 — provisional 63/533,708
Examiner
CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 796 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
829
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
61.9%
+21.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 796 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/29/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant contends that Wolf does not disclose the features of 1 and 10, particularly at least the features of “a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection having structure to engage with a recess at a forward end of the fire control unit frame”. Stating that; Wolf uses a different term for reference numeral 16, i.e. “unitary trigger frame”; this is irrelevant that the reference utilizes a different term in that the reference discloses all the elements as recited in the apparatus claim. Applicant contends that there is no disclosure in Wolf of a grip module having multiple portions that attach to each other, however Wolf clearly does disclose that portions 16 and 18 attach to each other and the secondary grip portion 16 has structure to engage with an unclaimed fire control unit frame (78). Applicant contends that Porat does not disclose the features of independent claims 1 and 10, particularly at least the feature(s) of "a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection having structure to engage with a recess at a forward end of the fire control unit frame." Applicant’s arguments are narrower than the breadth of the current claims, it is noted that the claims are interpreted in their broadest reasonable interpretation. Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The fact that module 200 of Porat covers the main grip portion (118) is irrelevant in that the claims require that “a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion”; the claims do not require the grip portions to be attachable in a specific configuration as applicant appears to argue. It is further noted that the claims do not require a fire control unit frame but merely at least one projection having structure allowing it to engage with a fire control frame. The slide, hammer, recoil spring housing and trigger are all part of the fire control frame and bolt 226 (i.e. projection on 208a) draws the two sides together at the recoil spring housing. Applicant contends that Harrigan does not disclose, teach or fairly suggest the features of independent claims 1 and 10, particularly at least the feature(s) of "a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion." Applicant specifically contends that in Harrigan, the dust cover 170 (i.e., the claimed secondary grip module portion) is not attached or attachable to the main grip module portion. Rather, as shown in FIG. 11, the dust cover 170 (i.e., the secondary grip module portion) is connected directly to the sub receiver 134 (i.e., the fire control unit frame) via engagement of the posts 188, 190 within the recesses 164, 166, and via a set screw 198 that is threadedly received by the bore 186 in the front dust cover 170 and the bore 160 in the protrusion 158 (of the sub receiver 134 that fits in the slot 196 of the dust cover 170). It is however noted that the claims do not require that the secondary grip module portion be directly attachable to the main grip module portion, hence it being attachable via another element means the two elements are still attachable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 9-15 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wolf et al. (US 10,955,209). Wolf et al. discloses a grip module for a modular handgun having a separable fire control unit frame (78), the grip module comprising: a main grip module portion (18) having structure with a cavity having structure to receive at least a portion of the fire control unit frame and a handgrip portion (20) having structure to receive an ammunition magazine, and a secondary grip module portion (i.e. trigger frame 16) attachable to the main grip module portion having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection (50) having structure to engage with a recess at a forward end of the fire control unit frame. 2. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the secondary grip module portion provides a recoil spring cover. (see Fig. 7) 3. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the secondary grip module portion includes an accessory attachment rail (54). 4. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the main and secondary grip module portions are attachable to each other with a sliding engagement. (Fig. 6A) 5. The grip module of claim 4, wherein the sliding engagement is longitudinal. (Fig. 6A) 6. The grip module of claim 4, wherein the sliding engagement includes a channel in at least one of the main grip module portion and the secondary grip module portion. (Fig. 6A) 9. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the main grip module portion includes at least one transverse opening (35) positioned to align with a transverse opening in the fire control unit frame to receive an assembly pin (48) to secure the fire control unit frame to the grip module. 10. A modular handgun, comprising: a fire control unit frame having at least one recess at a forward end; a grip module comprising: a main grip module portion, that includes a cavity having structure to receive the frame and a handgrip portion that receives an ammunition magazine, and a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion and having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection having structure to engage with the recess of the frame when assembled. (see remarks above) 11. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the secondary grip module portion provides a recoil spring cover. (see remarks above) 12. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the secondary grip module portion includes an accessory attachment rail. (see remarks above) 13. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the main and secondary grip module portions are attachable to each other with a sliding engagement. (see remarks above) 14. The grip module of claim 13, wherein the sliding engagement is longitudinal. (see remarks above) 15. The grip module of claim 13, wherein the sliding engagement includes a channel in at least one of the main grip module portion and the secondary grip module portion. (see remarks above) 18. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the main grip module portion includes at least one transverse opening positioned to align with a transverse opening in the fire control unit frame to receive an assembly pin to secure the fire control unit frame to the grip module. (see remarks above) Claim(s) 1, 8, 10, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Porat (US Patent Application Publication 2018/0010880). Wolf et al. discloses a grip module for a modular handgun having a separable fire control unit frame, the grip module comprising: a main grip module portion (100) having structure with a cavity having structure to receive at least a portion of the fire control unit frame and a handgrip portion (129) having structure to receive an ammunition magazine, and a secondary grip module portion (200) attachable to the main grip module portion having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection (226) having structure to engage with a recess at a forward end of the fire control unit frame (Fig. 1 and 3). 7. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the main grip module portion and secondary grip module portion are attached together with a threaded fastener (126, 127, 226, 234). 10. A modular handgun, comprising: a fire control unit frame having at least one recess at a forward end; a grip module comprising: a main grip module portion, that includes a cavity having structure to receive the frame and a handgrip portion that receives an ammunition magazine, and a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion and having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection having structure to engage with the recess of the frame when assembled. (see remarks above) 16. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the main grip module portion and secondary grip module portion are attached together with a threaded fastener. Claim(s) 1-6, 8-15, 17 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harrigan et al. (US 10,415,919). Harrigan discloses a grip module for a modular handgun having a separable fire control unit frame (134), the grip module comprising: a main grip module portion having structure with a cavity having structure to receive at least a portion of the fire control unit frame and a handgrip portion (112) having structure to receive an ammunition magazine, and a secondary grip module portion (170) attachable (via 134) to the main grip module portion having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection (184) having structure to engage with a recess (164, 166) at a forward end of the fire control unit frame. 2. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the secondary grip module portion provides a recoil spring cover. (par. 1, lines 25-30) 3. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the secondary grip module portion includes an accessory attachment rail (182). 4. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the main and secondary grip module portions are attachable to each other with a sliding engagement (col. 7, lines 20-25). 5. The grip module of claim 4, wherein the sliding engagement is longitudinal. (Fig. 10-11) 6. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the sliding engagement includes a channel in at least one of the main grip module portion and the secondary grip module portion. (Figs. 10-11) 8. The grip module of claim 1, comprising a plurality of secondary grip module portions of different length. (col. 7, lines 55-60) 9. The grip module of claim 1, wherein the main grip module portion includes at least one transverse opening positioned to align with a transverse opening in the fire control unit frame to receive an assembly pin to secure the fire control unit frame to the grip module. (168, 122, 202) 10. A modular handgun, comprising: a fire control unit frame having at least one recess at a forward end; a grip module comprising: a main grip module portion, that includes a cavity having structure to receive the frame and a handgrip portion that receives an ammunition magazine, and a secondary grip module portion attachable to the main grip module portion and having a rearward end having structure with at least one projection having structure to engage with the recess of the frame when assembled. (see remarks above) 11. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the secondary grip module portion provides a recoil spring cover. (see remarks above) 12. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the secondary grip module portion includes an accessory attachment rail. (see remarks above) 13. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the main and secondary grip module portions are attachable to each other with a sliding engagement. (see remarks above) 14. The grip module of claim 13, wherein the sliding engagement is longitudinal. (see remarks above) 15. The grip module of claim 13, wherein the sliding engagement includes a channel in at least one of the main grip module portion and the secondary grip module portion. (see remarks above) 17. The grip module of claim 10, comprising a plurality of secondary grip module portions of different length. (see remarks above) 18. The grip module of claim 10, wherein the main grip module portion includes at least one transverse opening positioned to align with a transverse opening in the fire control unit frame to receive an assembly pin to secure the fire control unit frame to the grip module. (see remarks above) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE CLEMENT whose telephone number is (571)272-6884. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571.272.6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE CLEMENT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 29, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674635
FIREARM ACTION MECHANISM
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12650283
ADJUSTABLE FIREARM ACCESSORY
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644661
FIREARM OPERATING SYSTEM
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638271
WEAPON ACCESSORY RISER AND INTEGRAL KEYPAD FOR WEAPON HANDGUARD
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631429
BALLISTIC SHIELD
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 796 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month