Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/811,248

SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — JP 2022-030164 +1 more
Examiner
MEKHLIN, ELI S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
690 granted / 1142 resolved
At TC average
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1142 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION (1) Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is the first office action on the merits. Claims 1-12 are pending before the Office for review. (2) Claim Objections Claims 2-8, 10 and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: the claims contain awkward language regarding the required ranges. Specifically, each of the identified claims sets a range for numerical values within the solid electrolyte material. The claims also contain language that the values is or are “satisfied”. This language is awkward and should be removed, as it is superfluous in the context of the requirements of the claimed invention. Appropriate correction is required. (3) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gu et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2023/0163290). With respect to claims 1 and 9, Gu teaches a solid electrolyte material comprising Li, Nb, Ti, Al and F. Paragraph 59. With respect to claim 12, Gu teaches a solid lithium-ion battery comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and an electrolyte layer positioned between the two, wherein the positive electrode includes the solid electrolyte material. Paragraphs 52 and 59. (4) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8, 10 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Gu teaches a solid electrolyte material comprising the required Li, Nb, Ti, Al and F, as explained above, but fails to teach or fairly suggest the specific composition requirements of dependent claims 2-8, 10 and 11, which limit the material to specific amounts of the listed elements. The solid electrolyte material taught by Gu, which can be represented as Li1.2Ni0.08Co0.08Al0.08Ti0.08Mn0.6Nb0.08O2+ðF0.08, is outside of the scope of the specific compositions required by claims 2-8, 10 and 11. (5) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELI S MEKHLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7597. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00 am to 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELI S MEKHLIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771280
Support plate for integrating photovoltaic panels of various dimensions
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756354
SOLAR MODULE FRAMES
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12744211
Positive Electrode and Lithium Secondary Battery Manufactured Using Same
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738887
FOLDABLE SOLAR PANEL
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733329
PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL AND PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.1%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1142 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month