Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/811,513

VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Feb 29, 2016 — provisional 62/301,502 +3 more
Examiner
THOMAS, BRANDI N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Magic Leap Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
911 granted / 1105 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1129
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
65.3%
+25.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1105 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgement is made of receipt of Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449) filed 10/4/2024, 12/13/2024, 10/10/2025, 2/12/2026, and 5/7/2026. An initialed copy is attached to this Office Action. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-3 and 6-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,099,194. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. 18/811,513 12,099,194 1. An imaging system, comprising: a light distributor including a single light distributor entry portion, a first exit portion on a first arm and a second exit portion, distinct from the first exit portion, on a second arm, the light distributor configured to direct a light beam into a light guiding optical element, wherein the single light distributor entry portion is disposed between the first and second exit portions, wherein the first arm is perpendicular to the second arm, and wherein the first and second arms are separated from each other along an axis orthogonal to both respective first and second axes of the first and second arms. 1. An imaging system, comprising: a light source configured to generate a light beam; a first light guiding optical element including a first entry portion and configured to propagate at least a first portion of the light beam by total internal reflection; a second light guiding optical element including a second entry portion and configured to propagate at least a second portion of the light beam by total internal reflection; and a light distributor including a single light distributor entry portion, a first exit portion on a first arm and a second exit portion, distinct from the first exit portion, on a second arm, the light distributor configured to direct at least the first and second portions of the light beam into the first and second light guiding optical elements, respectively, wherein the single light distributor entry portion is disposed between the first and second exit portions, wherein the first arm is perpendicular to the second arm, and wherein the first and second arms are separated from each other along an axis orthogonal to both respective first and second axes of the first and second arms. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the light guiding optical element and the light distributor are configured such that when the light beam interacts with the first exit portion, a first exit beamlet of the light beam exits the light distributor and enters the a light guiding optical element via an entry portion. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second light guiding optical elements and the light distributor are configured such that: when the light beam interacts with the first exit portion, a first exit beamlet of the light beam exits the light distributor and enters the first light guiding optical element via the first entry portion, and when the light beam interacts with the second exit portion, a second exit beamlet of the light beam exits the light distributor and enters the second light guiding optical element via the second entry portion. 3. The system of claim 2, further comprising a shutter configured to selectively interrupt a light path between the first exit portion and the entry portion, respectively. 3. The system of claim 1, further comprising first and second shutters configured to selectively interrupt first and second light paths between the first and second exit portions and the first and second entry portions, respectively. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first exit portion is a first beam splitter, and wherein the second exit portion is a second beam splitter. 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the first exit portion is a first beam splitter, and wherein the second exit portion is a second beam splitter. 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the first and second beam splitters have different sizes. 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the first and second beam splitters have different sizes. 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the entry portion has a size corresponding to the a size of the first beam splitter. 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the first and second entry portions have different sizes corresponding to the different sizes of the first and second beam splitters. 7. The system of claim 4, where the single light distributor entry portion is a receiving beam splitter configured to divide the light beam into first and second split beamlets respectively directed to the first and second beam splitters. 9. The system of claim 6, where the single light distributor entry portion is a receiving beam splitter configured to divide the light beam into first and second split beamlets respectively directed to the first and second beam splitters. 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the receiving beam splitter is a dichroic beam splitter. 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the receiving beam splitter is a dichroic beam splitter. 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the first split beamlet includes green light and the second split beamlet includes red and blue light. 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the first split beamlet includes green light and the second split beamlet includes red and blue light. 10. The system of claim 7, wherein the receiving beam splitter is a polarizing beam splitter, and wherein the light beam comprises polarized light. 12. The system of claim 9, wherein the receiving beam splitter is a polarizing beam splitter, and wherein the light beam comprises polarized light. 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the polarized light includes green light, wherein the light distributor also has a retardation filter configured to change a polarization angle of a portion of the light beam, and wherein the portion of the light beam includes blue light. 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the polarized light includes green light, wherein the light distributor also has a retardation filter configured to change a polarization angle of a portion of the light beam, and wherein the portion of the light beam includes blue light. 12. The system of claim 7, wherein the receiving beam splitter is an X-cube beam splitter. 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the receiving beam splitter is an X-cube beam splitter. 13. The system of claim 4, further comprising a third beam splitter disposed between the first beam splitter and the second beam splitter. 15. The system of claim 6, further comprising a third beam splitter disposed between the first beam splitter and the second beam splitter. 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the first exit portion and the second exit portion are a first out-coupling grating and a second out-coupling grating respectively. 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the first exit portion and the second exit portion are a first out-coupling grating and a second out-coupling grating respectively, wherein the first and second light guiding optical elements and the light distributor are configured such that: when the light beam interacts with the first out-coupling grating, a first exit beamlet of the light beam exits the light distributor and enters the first light guiding optical element via the first entry portion, and when the light beam interacts with the second out-coupling grating, a second exit beamlet of the light beam exits the light distributor and enters the second light guiding optical element via the second entry portion. 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the first out-coupling grating is a dynamic grating. 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the first out-coupling grating is a dynamic grating. 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the first out-coupling grating is a static grating. 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the first out-coupling grating is a static grating. 17. The system of claim 1, wherein the light distributor also has a third exit portion, and wherein the light distributor is configured to direct at least the first, second, and third portions of the light beam out of the light distributor. 19. The system of claim 1, further comprising a third light guiding optical element including a third entry portion and configured to propagate at least a third portion of the light beam by total internal reflection, wherein the light distributor also a third exit portion, and wherein the light distributor is configured to direct at least the first, second, and third portions of the light beam into the first, second, and third light guiding optical elements, respectively. 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the first portion of the light beam is red, wherein the second portion of the light beam is green, and wherein the third portion of the light beam is blue. 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the first portion of the light beam is red, wherein the second portion of the light beam is green, and wherein the third portion of the light beam is blue. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDI N THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2341. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 - 3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDI N THOMAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681355
DISPLAY MATERIAL INCLUDING PATTERNED AREAS OF ENCAPSULATED ELECTROPHORETIC MEDIA
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674980
HEAD-UP DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663685
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656652
ASYMMETRIC DRIVING FOR OPTICAL MODULATOR
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650584
METHOD, OPTICAL APPARATUS AND RETROFIT KIT FOR PRODUCING LIGHT SHEETS BY MEANS OF A RETROREFLECTOR
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 10m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1105 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month