Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/811,532

FILM-STICKING AUXILIARY DEVICE FOR MOBILE PHONE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Examiner
SELLS, JAMES D
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen Kukashi Technology Co.,Ltd
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
710 granted / 874 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
898
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 874 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . D1: CN 217945811 U, 02 December 2022 (02.12.2022), see description, paragraphs [0005]-[0033], and figures 1-4; D2: CN 114802893 A, 29 July 2022 (29.07.2022), see description, paragraphs [0006]-[0037], and figures 1-7 II. Novelty Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kaili (CN 217945811) in view of Yonghui (CN 114802893). Regarding claims 1-10, Kaili discloses flip-type tempered glass screen protector applicator, comprising a sheet substrate 10 (i.e., the connecting plate of the present application), wherein the sheet substrate 10 comprises a first substrate portion 11, a second substrate portion 12, and a bendably deformable connecting portion 13 (i.e., the fold line of the present application) connected between the first substrate portion 11 and the second substrate portion 12. A first positioning frame 14 used for positioning a mobile phone protrudes from the first substrate portion 11, and a second positioning frame 15 used for positioning a tempered glass screen protector 1 protrudes from the second substrate portion; the first positioning frame 14 and the second positioning frame 15 are mutually aligned by means of bending deformation of the connecting portion 13; snap-fit structures 20 are provided on mating surfaces of the first positioning frame 14 and the second positioning frame 15; when the first positioning frame 14 and the second positioning frame 15 are aligned, the two are mutually positioned and engaged by means of the snap-fit structures 20. However, Kaili does not disclose that: (1) a mobile phone screen protector and a mobile phone are both placed in a lower accommodating space, a second protrusion corresponding to a first protrusion position is provided in the lower accommodating space, and the second protrusion is in contact with the mobile phone screen protector located in the lower accommodating space to form an upward pressure; and (2) a first protrusion is provided on a cover plate, and the first protrusion is in contact with a mobile phone rear cover located in the lower accommodating space to form a downward pressure in the manner claimed by the applicant. Regarding these differences, the applicant is directed to the reference of Yonghui. Yonghui discloses a screen accommodating recess 11 is formed on a base 100 to allow for placement of both a mobile phone screen and a mobile phone screen protector 41, a cushion block 16 is provided in the middle of the screen accommodating recess 11, and the cushion block 16 can be fixedly arranged at the bottom of the screen accommodating recess 11 by means of adhesive bonding, and the cushion block 16 can be integrated with the base 100 by means of injection molding. The height of the cushion block is 0.5 mm to 4 mm. Yonghui also discloses that a cushion block is arranged in a screen accommodating recess to facilitate more effective air bubble removal. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to employ a lower accommodating space and a protrusion on a cover plate, as taught by Yonghui, in the device of Kaili in order to provide the predictable result of accommodating the physical features of the structure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES D SELLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1237. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES D. SELLS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1745 /JAMES D SELLS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600055
Hollow Artificial Log And Manufacturing Method Therefor
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598915
CONDENSED CYCLIC COMPOUND, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE CONDENSED CYCLIC COMPOUND, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590665
Monitoring of Lined Pipeline
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583187
BELT MOLDING MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570876
WATER-DISPERSED PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE COMPOSITION AND PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SHEET FOR RE-PEELING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 874 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month