Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/811,938

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Priority
Nov 23, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0158173 +1 more
Examiner
AKINYEMI, AJIBOLA A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
757 granted / 943 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
967
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
86.3%
+46.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 943 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-14 of application 18/811938 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent No.12100118. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-14 of application 18/811938 is the same as claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent No.12100118 except for word variations. For example, see table below: Application 18/811938 Patent No.12100118. 1. An electronic apparatus comprising: a memory configured to store a first neural network model and a second neural network model; and a processor connected to the memory and control the electronic apparatus, wherein the processor is configured to: obtain a first image by inputting an input image to the first neural network model and a second image by inputting the input image to the second neural network model, and obtain an output image by weighting the first image and the second image, wherein the processor is further configured to weight the first image and the second image by assigning different weights based on an object area and a background area included in the input image. 1. An electronic apparatus comprising: a memory configured to store a plurality of neural network models; and a processor connected to the memory and control the electronic apparatus, wherein the processor is configured to: obtain a weight map based on an object area included in an input image, obtain a plurality of images by inputting the input image to each of the plurality of neural network models, and obtain an output image by weighting the plurality of images based on the weight map, wherein each of the plurality of neural network models is a model trained to upscale an image, and wherein the processor is further configured to assign a higher value to an object area included in a first image from among the plurality of images than an object area included in a second image from among the plurality of images, and assign a lower value to a background area included in the first image than a background area included in the second image to weight the first image and the second image. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AJIBOLA A AKINYEMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1846. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:00pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, YUWEN PAN can be reached at (571)-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AJIBOLA A AKINYEMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683645
ARBITRATION CIRCUIT PORTIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683633
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSMITTING RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNALS IN MULTIPLE FREQUENCY BANDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684064
APPLICATION PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT WITH CALLER IDENTIFICATION FUNCTIONALITY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677227
METHOD FOR PERFORMING FEDERATED LEARNING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671976
ANTENNA SHIFTING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 943 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month