Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/811,969

3D ELECTRONIC ENDOSCOPE AND IMAGING SYSTEM THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Priority
Feb 24, 2022 — CN 202220402386.9 +1 more
Examiner
GHIMIRE, SHANKAR RAJ
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
209 granted / 274 resolved
+6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
326
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
80.8%
+40.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 274 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/08/2025, 08/22/2024, is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Restriction In view of applicant’s remarks dated 4/22/2026, the restriction requirement dated 02/26/2026 has been withdrawn. Claims 1-20 have been examined. In this view, the examiner notes that the applicant’s remarks (“the combination (Invention II) includes a light guide beam, a light source, and an imaging host, which are elements not specific limitations for patentability of this combination (to show novelty and unobviousness)” ) dated 4/22/2026 may be relied upon for both anticipation and obviousness determinations. See MPEP 2129. Claim Objections Claims 1-20 is objected to because of the following informalities: The claims are objected to because the lines are crowded too closely together, making reading difficult. Substitute claims with lines one and one-half or double spaced and with appropriate indentations (on good quality paper) are required. See 37 CFR 1.52(b). Claims 1, 15, 16 are missing “:” after the phrase “comprising” in line 1. These claims should also include indentations at appropriate positions at different instances. Applicant is recommended to identify similar defects in the entire claim set and provide appropriate corrections in the next office response. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: transmission unit, recited in claims 1, 10, 15, and 16. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description - (a) 315 in FIG. 2 (b) 3142 in FIG. 3 Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the illumination optical path is configured to illuminate" in line 6. This phrase/term is unclear because the optical path by itself cannot illuminate. Claim 1 recites “image signal” in lines 11-16. There is lack of proper antecedent base in this limitation at various instances. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 10, 15, 16 encompasses similar defect. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 3 recites “wherein the first flexible board is provided with a through-hole structure, wherein the first sensor is arranged inside said through-hole structure.” In view of FIG. 5, sensors 314a, 314b are over the flexible board/substrate. Thus, based on this figure, it is unclear how the sensor is arranged inside a through hole in the flexible board/substrate. Claim 17 encompasses similar defects. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2-20 are rejected for being dependent on a rejected base claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, 11, 14-16, 18-20, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Kuroki (WO 2017169822). Regarding claim 1, Kuroki discloses a 3D electronic endoscope (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2, annotated below), comprising an insertion portion (FIG. 2) and an operation portion (FIG. 2); wherein the insertion portion comprises a long tube (FIG. 2), an imaging module (image sensor 34-1; FIG. 2), an illumination optical path (FIG. 2), and a transmission unit (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring, 36a wiring, providing transmission; FIG. 2); the long tube is a tubular structure with a hollow interior (FIG. 2), the imaging module is arranged inside the long tube (FIG. 2), the illumination optical path and the transmission unit are also arranged inside the long tube (FIG. 2); the illumination optical path is configured to illuminate a designated region of an inspected object with a light (FIG. 2); the imaging module is configured to receive an image light (state imaging device 204) which is reflected or excited by the designated region and obtained by a distal end of the insertion portion, convert the image light into an electrical signal, and transmit the electrical signal to the operation portion through the transmission unit; wherein the operation portion comprises an operation handle housing (Application example to endoscopic surgery system: FIG. 14, is a diagram illustrating an example of a schematic configuration of an endoscopic surgery system to which the technology (present technology) according to the present disclosure can be applied. FIG. 14, is the application of FIG. 3), a controller (drive circuit 205), and a processing component for image signal (image processing unit 10113 is configured by a processor such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit)); the controller and the processing component for image signal are arranged inside the operation handle housing (FIG. 14); the controller is configured to implement different functions according to signal(s) which is(are) inputted by an operator (Imaging functions); the processing component for image signal is configured to process the electrical signal which is transmitted by the transmission unit, so as to obtain an image signal (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2); wherein the imaging module comprises a first optical path component, a second optical path component, a first sensor, a second sensor (34-1, 34-2 Image sensor; FIGS. 2, 3), a first flexible board, a second flexible board (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring), and a fixation substrate (Flexible wiring reinforcement resin 35, provides the fixation substrate); the first optical path component comprises a first objective lens group and a first prism group, the second optical path component comprises a second objective lens group and a second prism group (32-1, 32-2 lens; 33-1, 33-2 Prism mirror); the first objective lens group (32-1 lens; FIG. 2) is configured to receive the image light along a first path which is reflected or excited by the designated region, the first prism group is configured to reflect or transmit the image light along the first path to the first sensor (sensor 34-1; FIG. 2); the first sensor is electrically connected with the first flexible board (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring), and configured to convert the image light along the first path into a first electrical signal; the second objective lens group is configured to receive the image light along a second path which is reflected or excited by the designated region (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring); the second prism group is configured to reflect or transmit the image light along the second path to the second sensor (sensor 34-2; FIG. 2); the second sensor is electrically connected with the second flexible board, and configured to convert the image light along the second path into a second electrical signal (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring); the first flexible board and the second flexible board are electrically connected with the transmission unit, so as to transmit the first electrical signal and the second electrical signal to the transmission unit (FIG. 2); the first sensor and the second sensor are arranged on respective sides of the fixation substrate (flexible wiring reinforcing resin 35; FIG. 2); the first sensor and the first flexible board are arranged on one surface of the fixation substrate (FIG. 2); the second sensor and the second flexible board are arranged on the other surface of the fixation substrate (FIG. 2). PNG media_image1.png 536 857 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Kuroki discloses wherein the first sensor, the first flexible board, the fixation substrate, the second flexible board and the second sensor are stacked (FIGS. 2, 3). Regarding claim 4, Kuroki discloses wherein the first prism group comprises right-angle prism(s) or triangular prism(s); and/or the second prism group comprises right-angle prism(s) or triangular prism(s) (FIG. 2). Regarding claim 5, Kuroki discloses wherein a light-exiting end surface of the first prism group is a rectangle (FIG. 2); wherein a long side of said rectangle is parallel to an axial direction of the long tube, and a short side of said rectangle is perpendicular to the axial direction of the long tube (FIG.2); and/or a light-exiting end surface of the second prism group is a rectangle (FIG. 2); wherein a long side of said rectangle is parallel to an axial direction of the long tube, and a short side of said rectangle is perpendicular to the axial direction of the long tube (FIG. 2). Regarding claim 7, Kuroki discloses wherein a photosensitive area on a photosensitive surface of the first sensor is greater than or equal to a light-exiting end surface of the first prism group (As seen from FIG. 2, the projection of the light collecting surface of the lens 32-1, 32-2, are smaller than the area of the photosensitive area of the sensor.); and/or a photosensitive area on a photosensitive surface of the second sensor is greater than or equal to a light-exiting end surface of the second prism group (As seen from FIG. 2, the projection of the light collecting surface of the lens 32-1, 32-2, are smaller than the area of the photosensitive area of the sensor.; FIG. 2). Regarding claim 8, Kuroki discloses wherein the light-exiting end surface of the first prism group is arranged on the photosensitive surface of the first sensor (FIG. 2), and at least part of the photosensitive area on the photosensitive surface of the first sensor is in a closed space (FIG. 2); and/or the light-exiting end surface of the second prism group is arranged on the photosensitive surface of the second sensor, and at least part of the photosensitive area on the photosensitive surface of the second sensor is in a closed space (FIG. 2). Regarding claim 11, Kuroki discloses wherein the fixation substrate comprises a first fixation substrate and a second fixation substrate; wherein the first sensor and the first flexible board are arranged on the first fixation substrate; the second sensor and the second flexible board are arranged on the second fixation substrate (35 Flexible wiring reinforcement resin). Regarding claim 14, Kuroki discloses further comprising a support; wherein the first optical path component and the second optical path component are arranged at the support (FIG. 2). Regarding claim 15, Kuroki discloses a 3D electronic endoscope assembly (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2, annotated below), comprising: an insertion portion (FIG. 2, 3) and an operation portion (FIG. 14); wherein the insertion portion comprises a long tube (FIG. 2), an imaging module (image sensor 34-1; FIG. 2), an illumination optical path (FIG. 2), and a transmission unit (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring, 36a wiring, providing transmission; FIG. 2); the long tube is a tubular structure with a hollow interior (FIG. 2), the imaging module is arranged inside the long tube, the illumination optical path and the transmission unit are also arranged inside the long tube (FIG. 2); the illumination optical path is configured to illuminate a designated region of an inspected object with a light (FIG. 2); the imaging module is configured to receive an image light (imaging device 204) which is reflected or excited by the designated region and obtained by a distal end of the insertion portion, convert the image light into an electrical signal, and transmit the electrical signal to the operation portion through the transmission unit (FIGS. 2, 14); wherein the operation portion comprises an operation handle housing (FIG. 14, is an application of FIGS. 2, 3), a controller (drive circuit 205), and a processing component for image signal (image processing unit 10113 is configured by a processor such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit)); the controller and the processing component for image signal are arranged inside the operation handle housing (FIGS. 2, 14); the controller is configured to implement different functions according to signal(s) which is(are) inputted by an operator (Imaging functions; FIG. 14); the processing component for image signal is configured to process the electrical signal which is transmitted by the transmission unit, so as to obtain an image signal (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2); wherein the imaging module comprises an objective lens group (FIG. 2), a prism group (FIG. 2), a sensor (34-1, 34-2 Image sensor; FIGS. 2, 3), a fixation substrate (Flexible wiring reinforcement resin 35, provides the fixation substrate), and a flexible board (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring); wherein the objective lens group is configured to receive the image light which is reflected or excited by the designated region (32-1, 32-2 lens; 33-1, 33-2 Prism mirror);); the prism group is configured to reflect or transmit to the sensor the image light which is received by the objective lens group (FIG. 2); wherein the sensor is electrically connected with the flexible board (FIG. 2), and configured to convert the image light into the electrical signal (FIG. 2); the flexible board is electrically connected with the transmission unit, and configured to transmit the electrical signal to the transmission unit (FIG. 2); the sensor and the flexible board are electrically connected with each other (FIG. 2), wherein the sensor and the flexible board are arranged on the fixation substrate (FIG. 2). PNG media_image1.png 536 857 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 16, Kuroki discloses an imaging system for 3D electronic endoscope (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2, annotated below), comprising a light source (Source device 11203; FIG. 14), a light guide beam (lens barrel 1110), an imaging host (CCU 11201; FIG. 14; The examiner notes here that light beam, light source, imaging host are not specific limitations for patentability as admitted by the applicant on remarks dated 4/22/2026), a cable ( wired communication using the transmission cable 11400; FIG. 15), and a 3D electronic endoscope (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2, annotated below); wherein the light source is connected with the 3D electronic endoscope through the light guide beam (lens barrel 1110; FIG. 14), and one end of the 3D electronic endoscope is connected with the imaging host through the cable (FIG. 14); wherein the 3D electronic endoscope comprises an insertion portion (FIG. 2) and an operation portion (FIG. 14); wherein the insertion portion comprises a long tube (FIG. 2), an imaging module (image sensor 34-1; FIG. 2), an illumination optical path (FIG. 2), and a transmission unit (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring, 36a wiring, providing transmission; FIG. 2); the long tube is a tubular structure with a hollow interior (FIG. 2), the imaging module is arranged inside the long tube (FIG. 2), the illumination optical path and the transmission unit are also arranged inside the long tube (FIG. 2); the illumination optical path is configured to illuminate a designated region of an inspected object with a light (FIG. 2); the imaging module is configured to receive an image light (imaging device 204) which is reflected or excited by the designated region and obtained by a distal end of the insertion portion, convert the image light into an electrical signal, and transmit the electrical signal to the operation portion through the transmission unit (FIGS. 2, 14); wherein the operation portion comprises an operation handle housing (FIG. 14, is an application of FIGS. 2, 3), a controller (drive circuit 205), and a processing component for image signal (image processing unit 10113 is configured by a processor such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit)); the controller and the processing component for image signal are arranged inside the operation handle housing (FIG. 14); the controller is configured to implement different functions according to signal(s) which is(are) inputted by an operator (Imaging functions); the processing component for image signal is configured to process the electrical signal which is transmitted by the transmission unit, so as to obtain an image signal (Three-dimensional image is generated from the parallax information; endoscope 11; FIG. 2); wherein the imaging module comprises a first optical path component, a second optical path component, a first sensor, a second sensor (34-1, 34-2 Image sensor; FIGS. 2, 3), a first flexible board, a second flexible board (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring), and a fixation substrate (Flexible wiring reinforcement resin 35, provides the fixation substrate); the first optical path component comprises a first objective lens group and a first prism group, the second optical path component comprises a second objective lens group and a second prism group (32-1, 32-2 lens; 33-1, 33-2 Prism mirror); the first objective lens group (32-1 lens; FIG. 2) is configured to receive the image light along a first path which is reflected or excited by the designated region, the first prism group is configured to reflect or transmit the image light along the first path to the first sensor (sensor 34-1; FIG. 2); the first sensor is electrically connected with the first flexible board (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring), and configured to convert the image light along the first path into a first electrical signal; the second objective lens group is configured to receive the image light along a second path which is reflected or excited by the designated region (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring); the second prism group is configured to reflect or transmit the image light along the second path to the second sensor (sensor 34-2; FIG. 2); the second sensor is electrically connected with the second flexible board, and configured to convert the image light along the second path into a second electrical signal (36-1, 36-2 Flexible wiring); the first flexible board and the second flexible board are electrically connected with the transmission unit, so as to transmit the first electrical signal and the second electrical signal to the transmission unit (FIG. 2); the first sensor and the second sensor are arranged on respective sides of the fixation substrate (flexible wiring reinforcing resin 35; FIG. 2); the first sensor and the first flexible board are arranged on one surface of the fixation substrate (FIG. 2); the second sensor and the second flexible board are arranged on the other surface of the fixation substrate (FIG. 2). PNG media_image1.png 536 857 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, Kuroki discloses wherein a light-exiting end surface of the first prism group is a rectangle (FIG. 2); wherein a long side of said rectangle is parallel to an axial direction of the long tube (FIG.2), and a short side of said rectangle is perpendicular to the axial direction of the long tube (FIG. 2); and/or a light-exiting end surface of the second prism group is a rectangle (FIG. 2); wherein a long side of said rectangle is parallel to an axial direction of the long tube, and a short side of said rectangle is perpendicular to the axial direction of the long tube (FIG. 2). Regarding claim 19, Kuroki discloses wherein a photosensitive area on a photosensitive surface of the first sensor is greater than or equal to a light-exiting end surface of the first prism group (As seen from FIG. 2, the projection of the light collecting surface of the lens 32-1, 32-2, are smaller than the area of the photosensitive area of the sensor.); and/or a photosensitive area on a photosensitive surface of the second sensor is greater than or equal to a light-exiting end surface of the second prism group (As seen from FIG. 2, the projection of the light collecting surface of the lens 32-1, 32-2, are smaller than the area of the photosensitive area of the sensor.; FIG. 2). Regarding claim 20, Kuroki discloses wherein the light-exiting end surface of the first prism group is arranged on the photosensitive surface of the first sensor (FIG. 2), and at least part of the photosensitive area on the photosensitive surface of the first sensor is in a closed space (FIG. 2); and/or the light-exiting end surface of the second prism group is arranged on the photosensitive surface of the second sensor, and at least part of the photosensitive area on the photosensitive surface of the second sensor is in a closed space (FIG. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 6, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Kamo (US 20130155212). Regarding claim 6, Kuroki does not expressly disclose diaphragm(s), which is(are) arranged on a light-exiting end surface of the first prism group and/or a light-exiting end surface of the second prism group. Kamo is directed to optical unit (abstract) and teaches wherein further comprising diaphragm(s) (Diaphragm BI; FIG. 8), which is(are) arranged on a light-exiting end surface of the first prism group. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include diaphragms in accordance with the teaching of Kamo so that interference and glare due to excess light could be reduced. Claim(s) 3, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Minami (US 5365268). Regarding claim 3, Kuroki does not expressly disclose wherein the first flexible board is provided with a through-hole structure, wherein the first sensor is arranged inside said through-hole structure. Minami is directed to a circuit board of a solid-state image sensor (CCD) (abstract) and teaches wherein the first flexible board is provided with a through-hole structure, wherein the first sensor is arranged inside said through-hole structure (The terminals for connecting the package and the substrate are through-hole terminals 21; The package and the substrate are securely connected to each other by pouring a solder into the through-hole terminals. FIG. 3; Also see 112(b) rejection above.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include through holes in the circuit board in accordance with the teaching of Minami so that the sensors and other elements of the packages may be assembled by using the through holes. Claim(s) 9, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Khettal (US 20180360297). Regarding claim 9, Kuroki does not expressly disclose glass plate(s), which is(are) arranged between the first prism group and the first sensor, and/or between the second prism group and the second sensor. Khettal is directed to a camera objective lens (abstract) and teaches glass plate(s), which is(are) arranged between the first prism group and the first sensor, and/or between the second prism group and the second sensor (A plane-parallel glass plate parallel to the sensor surface for protection thereof is provided. Para [0026]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include a glass plate parallel to the sensor surface in accordance with the teaching of Khettal for the protection of the sensor surface. Claim(s) 10, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Takahashi (US 8462202). Regarding claim 10, Kuroki does not expressly disclose wherein the transmission unit comprises a signal amplification circuit, which is configured to amplify the first electrical signal and/or the second electrical signal, and transmit the amplified signal(s) to the processing component for image signal. Takahashi is directed to camera objective lens (abstract) and teaches wherein the transmission unit comprises a signal amplification circuit, which is configured to amplify the first electrical signal and/or the second electrical signal, and transmit the amplified signal(s) to the processing component for image signal (AMP 40 amplifies the imaging signal output from CCD 23 by a gain to output to a correlation double sampling programmable gain amplifier (hereinafter, abbreviated as CDS/PGA) 42.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include an amplifier in the imaging circuit in accordance with the teaching of Takahashi for the purpose of amplifying image signals. Claim(s) 12, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Krivopisk (US 20170242240). Regarding claim 12, Kuroki does not expressly disclose wherein the fixation substrate is a heat conduction plate for conducting heat which is generated by the sensor(s). Krivopisk is directed to a circuit board design uses CMOS sensors (abstract) and teaches wherein the fixation substrate is a heat conduction plate for conducting heat which is generated by the sensor(s) (Metal frames 705, 706, 707 also serve as heat sinks to the sensors incorporated in the endoscope; Para [0085]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include a heat plate along with the fixation substrate accordance with the teaching of Krivopisk so that heat generated by the sensor is absorbed and sinked outside the system. Claim(s) 13, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Ishikawa (US 20160029879). Regarding claim 13, Kuroki does not expressly disclose wherein the fixation substrate is a ceramic plate or a metal plate. Ishikawa is directed to an image pickup unit for an endoscope (abstract) and teaches wherein the fixation substrate is a ceramic plate or a metal plate (Substrate connection portions are metal pads; Para [0057]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include metal as a fixation substrate/portion so that the substrate can function as heat sink for the system. Claim(s) 17, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuroki (WO 2017169822) in view of Minami (US 5365268). Regarding claim 17, Kuroki discloses wherein the first sensor, the first flexible board, the fixation substrate, the second flexible board and the second sensor are stacked (FIGS. 2, 3); Kuroki does not expressly disclose wherein the first flexible board is provided with a through-hole structure, wherein the first sensor is arranged inside said through-hole structure; and/or the second flexible board is provided with a through-hole structure, wherein the second sensor is arranged inside said through-hole structure. Minami is directed to a circuit board of a solid-state image sensor (CCD) (abstract) and teaches wherein the first flexible board is provided with a through-hole structure, wherein the first sensor is arranged inside said through-hole structure (The terminals for connecting the package and the substrate are through-hole terminals 21; The package and the substrate are securely connected to each other by pouring a solder into the through-hole terminals. FIG. 3; Also see 112(b) rejection above.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kuroki to include through holes in the circuit board in accordance with the teaching of Minami so that the sensors and other elements of the packages may be assembled by using the through holes. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO – 892. See Kagawa (WO 2014171284) for flexible printed circuit board (FPC) 80, and pair of objective lens units used for stereoscopic imaging. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANKAR R GHIMIRE whose telephone number is (571)272-0515. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached on 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHANKAR RAJ GHIMIRE/Examiner, Art Unit 3795 /ANH TUAN T NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3795 05/16/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635862
ENDOSCOPE WITH OPTICAL FILTER ARRANGEMENT AND USE
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629013
ARTHROSCOPIC PROBE DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622577
ENDOSCOPE HAVING MULTIPLE VIEWING DIRECTIONS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12600865
ANTI-FOULING ENDOSCOPES AND USES THEREOF
7y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569118
ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM AND PACKAGING MATERIALS FOR ENDOSCOPE
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+19.3%)
3y 1m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 274 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month