Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/812,107

PACKAGING MATERIAL STRUCTURE AND PACKAGING STRUCTURE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Priority
Dec 11, 2023 — TW 112148065
Examiner
BUI, LUAN KIM
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
WISTRON NEWEB Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
1023 granted / 1482 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1503
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
68.9%
+28.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1482 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Goodsite (3,613,985). Goodsite discloses a packaging material structure (Figs. 1-3) comprising a supporting plate (11) having a supporting side (the side of the fold line 12) and a supporting surface (Figs. 2-3), a base plate (13, 15, 17) connected to the supporting side (12) and having a base plate side (18, 19), the base plate comprising two base plate folding lines (14, 16) separately disposed on the base plate, a first foldable area (the area of the supporting side 12) disposed on the supporting plate, and the supporting plate and the base plate bent toward each other along the first foldable area (Fig. 2), an inserting element (23) integrally connected to the base plate side (18), and an inserting slot (21) disposed on the supporting plate. Goodsite further discloses the base plate is for bending toward the supporting surface along the two base plate folding lines so that the inserting element is correspondingly inserted in the inserting slot. As to claim 2, Goodsite further discloses the base plate is divided into a first portion (13), a second portion (15), and a third portion (17) by the two base plate folding lines, the first portion is connected to the supporting plate, the second portion is disposed between the first portion and the third portion, and the inserting element is connected to the third portion (the inserting element is connected a fourth portion (19) and the fourth portion is connected to the third portion; therefore, the inserting element is connected to the third portion as claimed). As to claim 3, Goodsite discloses a maximum width of the first portion (13) is W1, a maximum width of the third portion (17) is W3, and W1 ≥ W 3   (column 2, lines 41-43). As to claim 4, Goodsite further discloses a side plate (19) integrally connected to the base plate side (18), and a second foldable area (18, 19) disposed on the side plate, and the side plate bent toward the supporting surface along the second foldable area. Goodsite discloses when the base plate is bent toward the supporting surface along the two base plate folding lines, and the side plate is bent toward the supporting surface along the second foldable area, the base plate and the side plate form a frame body, and the side plate abuts against the supporting surface (Fig. 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 9-24 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 03/27/2026 have been fully considered but they are not deemed to be persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to Goodsite in the remarks are noted. They are not persuasive because Goodsite discloses the base plate side (18, 19) located on one side of the base plate away from the supporting plate as argued by the Applicant. Applicant indicates that “the inserting element 131 is neither in the inter region of the base plate 120 nor across the base plate 120. … the tongue member 23 disclosed in Goodsite” is noted, but this is not persuasive because there is nothing in claim 1 requires the inserting element must be along an edge of a panel or the inserting element cannot be located in the inter region of the base plate or across the base plate. Applicant argues in the remarks that Goodsite fails to disclose “an inserting element integrally connected to the base plate side” is noted. This is not persuasive because Goodsite discloses the base plate having the base plate side (18, 19) and the inserting element (23) integrally connected (22) to the base plate side as claimed. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUAN K BUI whose telephone number is (571)272-4552. The examiner can normally be reached Generally M-F, 7-4. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Avilés can be reached on 571-270-5531 or orlando.aviles-bosques@uspto.gov. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUAN K BUI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680536
NOVEL SINGLE-MATERIAL HAND PUMP
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679617
Packaging and holder for a USB stick
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679603
SUBSTANCE CONTAINER
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680001
TAPE KIT FOR SEALING A PACKAGE
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662299
PACKAGE INCLUDING TRAY FOR CONSUMER PRODUCT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+28.3%)
2y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1482 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month