Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/812,493

INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD AND INFORMATION PROVIDING SERVER

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Priority
Sep 25, 2023 — JP 2023-160096
Examiner
HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
678 granted / 884 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
921
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 884 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Claims 1-8 are pending. Claims 1-5 are amended directly or by dependency on an amended claim. Claims 6-8 are new. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 8-13, filed 7 August, 2026, with respect to the 35 USC 101 rejections of claims 1-5, and pages 13-17 with respect to the 35 USC 103 rejections of claims 1-5, along with accompanying amendments received on the same date, have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 35 USC 101 rejections of claims 1-5 and 35 USC 103 rejections of claims 1-5 have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 USC 112a. It is noted the claims in their current form do appear to overcome the prior art but lack sufficient support for aspects of the claim language. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 5 (and by dependency claims 2-4, 6-8) are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The term “wherein other images from among the plurality of images of the target spot are excluded from the spot selection screen” does not have anything that can be fairly construed as support in the spot selection screen portions of the specification. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20140351064 A1 (1. A method comprising: generating a plurality of thumbnail images corresponding to a plurality of street view images, wherein each of the plurality of street view images were captured concurrently at a single geographical location and taken from a different one of a plurality of direction angles; identifying one or more of the plurality of street view images that depict at least one point of interest based upon one or more point of interest preferences; and generating one or more point of interest indicators that indicate which of the plurality of thumbnail images correspond to the identified one or more street view images); US 20230247279 A1 (1. An imaging apparatus comprising: a processor, wherein, in a mode in which focus adjustment is performed, the processor performs processing of extracting a plurality of subjects from moving image data obtained by imaging, outputs first moving image data in which a region including a specific subject among the plurality of subjects is magnified to a display destination, and outputs, in a case in which a change has occurred in any of the plurality of subjects in the moving image data, second moving image data in which a region of each of the plurality of subjects is magnified to the display destination instead of the first moving image data, and then outputs, in a case in which an instruction to select the subject is given, third moving image data in which a region including the selected subject is magnified to the display destination instead of the second moving image data); “InCarAR: A Design Space Towards 3D Augmented Reality Applications in Vehicles”: PNG media_image1.png 804 588 media_image1.png Greyscale Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE ENTEZARI whose telephone number is (571)270-5084. The examiner can normally be reached 10-7 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vincent M Rudolph can be reached at (571) 272-8243. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE M ENTEZARI HAUSMANN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 07, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12762713
OBJECT AND SWARM DETECTION, TRACKING, AND CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12725301
SEMANTIC VISUAL FEATURE SHARING
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718585
ACCURACY FOR OBJECT DETECTION
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12711781
IDENTIFYING BIDIRECTIONAL CHANNELIZATION ZONES AND LANE DIRECTIONALITY
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12700257
CASCADED DETECTION OF FACIAL ATTRIBUTES
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+21.0%)
2y 12m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 884 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month