Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/813,153

DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Priority
Feb 25, 2022 — CN 202210175816.2 +1 more
Examiner
PARK, JUNG H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
866 granted / 983 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1025
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 983 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6, 8-10, 13, 15-17, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being unpatentable by Zheng et al. (US 2025/0024478, “Zheng”). Regarding claim 1, Zheng discloses a data transmission method, wherein the method comprises: - receiving configuration information from a network device, wherein the configuration information is used to configure a plurality of transmission occasions (See 705 & 725 Fig.7, receiving CG configuration; See ¶.108, the energy harvesting device may report a capability indicating a number of consecutive skipped CG occasions supported by the energy harvesting device); - performing data transmission to or receiving from the network device in accordance with on one or more first transmission occasions (See Fig.7), wherein the one or more first transmission occasions are some of the plurality of transmission occasions (See ¶.107, the energy harvesting device may perform energy harvesting in between the CG occasions of the CG configuration; See ¶.108, the energy harvesting device may skip a CG occasion (e.g., may not transmit on CG resources of the CG occasion) based at least in part on the energy harvesting device having a low energy state or not having data to transmit); - receiving adjustment information from the network device (See 670 Fig.6 and ¶.101, receiving modified CG configuration from the network node); and - performing data transmission to or receiving from the network device in accordance with on one or more second transmission occasions based on the adjustment information (680 Fig.6, the device transmits on CG resource based on the modified CG configuration; See 850 Fig.8, perform a transmission in accordance with dynamic grant or the configured grant), - wherein the one or more second transmission occasions are some of the plurality of transmission occasions, and the one or more second transmission occasions are different from the one or more first transmission occasions (See 725 Fig.7, one or more CG transmission occasions; PNG media_image1.png 382 788 media_image1.png Greyscale ). Regarding claim 2, Zheng discloses “the configuration information is configured grant (CG) configuration information, the transmission occasion is a CG transmission occasion, the first transmission occasion is a first CG transmission occasion, and the second transmission occasion is a second CG transmission occasion (See 725 Fig.7).” Regarding claim 3, Zheng discloses “performing data transmission with the network device on the one or more first CG transmission occasions based on the CG configuration information (See 510 & 510 Fig.5, 610 & 640 Fig.6, and 705 & 720 Fig.7 for CG configuration, activate CG configuration, and modified CG configuration).” Regarding claim 6, Zheng discloses “receiving second activation information from the network device; and the performing data transmission with the network device on one or more first transmission occasions comprises: performing data transmission with the network device on the one or more first CG transmission occasions based on the second activation information (See 550 & 560 Fig.5, activate CG configuration and transmission via activated CG resource; See further 640 Fig.6, 720 Fig.7).” Regarding claim 8, it is an apparatus claim corresponding to the method claim 1 and is therefore rejected for the similar reasons set forth in the rejection of the claim. Regarding claims 9, 10, and 13, they are claims corresponding to claims 2, 3, & 6, respectively and are therefore rejected for the similar reasons set forth in the rejection of the claims. Regarding claim 15, it is a non-transitory computer readable medium claim corresponding to the method claim 1 and is therefore rejected for the similar reasons set forth in the rejection of the claim. Regarding claims 16, 17, and 20, they are claims corresponding to claims 2, 3, & 6, respectively and are therefore rejected for the similar reasons set forth in the rejection of the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 14, 18, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng in view of Deng et al. (US 2024/0406946, “Deng”). Regarding claim 4, Zheng discloses “the CG configuration information comprises third MCS information, and the adjustment information comprises fourth MCS information; and the third MCS information is used to configure an MCS on each of the one or more first CG transmission occasions, and the fourth MCS information indicates an MCS on each of the one or more second CG transmission occasions (See ¶.63, the base station may transmit CG activation DCI to the UE to activate the CG configuration for the UE. The base station may indicate, in the CG activation DCI, communication parameters, such as an MCS, an RB allocation, and/or antenna ports, for the CG physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) communications to be transmitted in the scheduled CG occasions 305; See ¶.88, he energy harvesting device is capable of performing a transmission at each CG occasion. For example, the grant size may be based at least in part on a traffic requirement (e.g., a data rate requirement, a latency requirement, or the like) and the energy harvesting state of the UE. In some aspects, the grant size may be indicated by a parameter, such as an MCS and transport block size (TBS) parameter which may indicate a modulation order, target code rate, and TBS), but does not explicitly disclose what Deng discloses “third MCS information and the fourth MCS information” (Deng, See Fig.6 and ¶.112-113; [0112] Please refer to FIG. 6. FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing DCI scheduling multiple PDSCHs with MCSs according to an embodiment of the present disclosure when the sizes of the multiple PDSCHs are different. An architecture shown in FIG. 6 is a frequency division duplex (FDD) frame structure. [0113] The first FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 1, the first MCS field is denoted as MCS 1, and the first PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 1. The second FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 2, the second MCS field is denoted as MCS 2, and the second PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 2. The third FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 3, the third MCS field is denoted as MCS 3, and the third PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 3. The fourth FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 4, the fourth MCS field is denoted as MCS 4, and the fourth PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 4. According to the present disclosure, the resources allocation and the MCS index for the PDSCH 1 are indicated by the FDRA 1 and the MCS 1 respectively. The resource allocation and the MCS index for the PDSCH 2 are indicated by the FDRA 2 and the MCS 2 respectively. The resource allocation and the MCS index for the PDSCH 3 are indicated by the FDRA 3 and the MCS 3 respectively. The resource allocation and the MCS index for the PDSCH 4 are indicated by the FDRA 4 and the MCS 4 respectively. The remaining parameters are common for all of the PDSCHs 1-4. As shown in FIG. 6, the PDSCHs 1-4 (i.e., the TBs) are continuously transmitted transmissions. In detail, the PDSCHs 1-4 are continuously transmitted back to back. In summary, the TBs are continuously mapped to available slots or mini-slots, and the slots or mini-slots of TBs mapped can be consecutive or non-consecutive. PNG media_image2.png 255 595 media_image2.png Greyscale ). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to apply “third MCS information and fourth MCS information” as taught by Deng into the system of Zheng, so that it provides way for DCI to schedule multiple PDSCHs with MCSs according to an embodiment of the present disclosure when the sizes of the multiple PDSCHs (Deng, See ¶.112). Regarding claim 5, Zheng does not explicitly disclose what Deng discloses “the CG configuration information further comprises third FDRA information, and the adjustment information further comprises fourth FDRA information; and the third FDRA information is used to configure a frequency domain resource on each of the one or more first CG transmission occasions, and the fourth FDRA information indicates a frequency domain resource on each of the one or more second CG transmission occasions (Zheng, See ¶.76, CG configuration indicates a resource allocation associated with frequency domain; Deng, See Figs.5-6, the first FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 1, and the first PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 1. The second FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 2, and the second PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 2. The third FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 3, and the third PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 3. The fourth FDRA field is denoted as FDRA 4, and the fourth PDSCH transmission is denoted as PDSCH 4. The resource allocation of the PDSCH 1 is indicated by the FDRA 1, the resource allocation of the PDSCH 2 is indicated by the FDRA 2, the resource allocation of the PDSCH 3 is indicated by the FDRA 3, and the resource allocation of the PDSCH 4 is indicated by the FDRA 4. The remaining parameters are common for all of the PDSCHs 1-4. As shown in FIG. 5, the PDSCHs 1-4 (i.e., the TBs) are continuously transmitted transmissions. In detail, the PDSCHs 1-4 are continuously transmitted back to back. In summary, the TBs are continuously mapped to available slots or mini-slots, and the slots or mini-slots of TBs mapped can be consecutive or non-consecutive. PNG media_image3.png 284 536 media_image3.png Greyscale ).” Regarding claim 7, Zheng does not explicitly disclose what Deng discloses “the second activation information comprises fifth MCS information, and the adjustment information comprises sixth MCS information; and the fifth MCS information indicates an MCS on each of the one or more first CG transmission occasions, and the sixth MCS information indicates an MCS on each of the one or more second CG transmission occasions (Zheng, See ¶.63, the base station may transmit CG activation DCI to the UE to activate the CG configuration for the UE. The base station may indicate, in the CG activation DCI, communication parameters, such as an MCS; Deng, See Figs.5-6, ¶.110-113).” Therefore, this claim is rejected with the similar reasons and motivation set forth in the rejection of claim 4. Regarding claims 11, 12, 14, 18, and 19, they are claims corresponding to claims 4, 5, 7, 4, & 5, respectively and are therefore rejected for the similar reasons set forth in the rejection of the claims. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jung H Park whose telephone number is 571-272-8565. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:00 AM-3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached on 571-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUNG H PARK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706831
SYMMETRIC NETWORKING TO CLOUD GATEWAY BASED ON DYNAMIC MAPPING OF ROUTE PREFERENCE INFORMATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696283
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR CROSS DIVISION DUPLEX OPERATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696140
METHOD FOR MANAGING QOS IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK USING A MACHINE LEARNING
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684533
ADAPTATION OF PROCESSING TIMELINES FOR HIGH FREQUENCY BANDS
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684451
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PATH BASED ON PREDICTION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 983 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month