Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/813,388

PCB CORE LAMINATE FOR WIRELESS POWER CHARGER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Priority
May 29, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0070394
Examiner
MCALLISTER, MICHAEL F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Amosense Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 616 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
621
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 20100288726 hereinafter Lee). In regards to claim 1, Lee discloses;” A printed circuit board (PCB) (abstract) core laminate , the PCB core laminate comprising: a heat-dissipating material (Fig. 2 (20)); and a PCB core (Fig. 2 ( 4 layers of (10)) embedded in the heat-dissipating material (Fig. 2 (shown)), wherein the PCB core comprises a PCB substrate and printed circuit patterns located on surfaces of the PCB substrate (Fig. 2 (12)).” But does not directly disclose;” for a wireless power charger”, But it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ 2d 1647 (1987). Therefore the claimed invention is disclosed. In regards to claim 2, a modified Lee discloses;” The PCB core laminate of claim 1, wherein: a plurality of PCB cores are embedded in the heat-dissipating material; and the plurality of PCB cores are stacked (Fig. 2 (shown)).” In regards to claim 5, a modified Lee discloses;” The PCB core laminate of claim 4, wherein the heat-dissipating material further comprises one or more types of inorganic materials that include BN or Al203 (paragraph 0035).” In regards to claim 6, a modified Lee discloses;” The PCB core laminate of claim 1, wherein, in the PCB core, the printed circuit patterns are disposed on upper and lower surfaces of the PCB substrate (Fig. 2 (shows conductors on both side of insulator (10)).” In regards to claim 7, a modified Lee discloses;” The PCB core laminate of claim 6, wherein, in a cross-section of the PCB core laminate, the printed circuit pattern disposed on the upper surface of the PCB substrate and the printed circuit pattern disposed on the lower surface of the PCB substrate are arranged to correspond to each other (Fig. 2 (shown)).” In regards to claim 8, a modified Lee discloses;” The PCB core laminate of claim 6, wherein, in a cross-section of the PCB core laminate, a difference in pattern width between the printed circuit pattern disposed on the upper surface of the PCB substrate and the printed circuit pattern disposed on the lower surface of the PCB substrate is smaller than or equal to 5% (Fig. 2 (shows conductors are the same size)).” Allowable Subject Matter Claims objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 16-20 are allowed. REASON FOR ALLOWANCE The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art taken singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitation of the independent claim, in such a manner that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 would be proper. The prior art fails to teach a combination of all the features as presented in independent claim 16 with the allowable feature being:” A method of manufacturing a printed circuit board (PCB) core laminate for a wireless power charger, the method comprising: integrating a PCB core into a heat-dissipating material by insert-injection.” Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL F MCALLISTER whose telephone number is (571)272-2453. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7 AM-4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL F MCALLISTER/Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695281
CABLE SLEEVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696377
DISPLAY MODULE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690124
HIGH-CURRENT ELEMENT FOR HIGH-CURRENT PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683039
Wiring Harness and Electrical Assembly Having a Wiring Harness
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671236
GROUNDED FOLDABLE ELECTRICAL CABLE CLAMP
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+6.2%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month