Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/814,741

OPTICAL MODULATOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Priority
Dec 09, 2023 — provisional 63/608,231
Examiner
STAHL, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Enosemi Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1152 granted / 1279 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1291
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§102
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1279 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Objection The specification is objected to because [0055] refers to "FIG. 13" instead of "FIG. 14". Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because: line 7 is missing "of" between "plurality" and "phase"; lines 7 and 8 both end with a comma and a semicolon; and line 11 includes an unnecessary instance of "and" before the semicolon. Claim 19 is objected to because lines 2 and 4 recite "comprising" instead of "comprises". Claim 21 is objected to because line 1 recites "capacitors" instead of "capacitor", and because line 2 includes a reference number "131" which is not in parentheses (see MPEP 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 9-11 are indefinite because there is insufficient antecedent basis for "the plurality of first inductors" as recited in each claim. It appears that claims 9-11 should each depend from claim 2 rather than claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 9-10, 15, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gill et al. (article in Optics Express, June 2015, citation "U" on attached 892 form). Claim 1: Gill discloses an optical modulator comprising (see mainly figs. 1 and 3): an input optical port (not labeled, but the origin of the "Optical input" in fig. 1(b)) for receiving an input light signal; an output optical port (not labeled, but the destination of the "Optical output" in fig. 1(b)) for outputting a modulated light signal; a first waveguide arm (the right waveguide arm depicted by the red paths in figs. 1(b) and 1(d)) and a second waveguide arm (the left waveguide arm which is not labeled in fig. 1(c) but is analogous to the left red path in fig. 3(a)) extending between the input optical port and the output optical port to guide the input light signal from the input optical port to the output optical port; a first plurality of phase shifters (first paragraph of section 2, "series of 100-μm-long RF/optic interaction sections that contain two 100 μm Si rib waveguide PN junction optical phase shifters, each being wired from signal to ground on both sides of the central signal electrode") in the first waveguide arm[[,]] (there are 8 phase shifters along the first waveguide arm in figs. 1(b) and 1(c)); a second plurality of phase shifters in the second waveguide arm[[,]] (not labeled, but the 8 phase shifters along the left waveguide arm in fig. 1(c); note also the first paragraph of section 3 states that there are 0.8 mm (i.e. 800 µm) of the phase shifters in each MZM arm, and each phase shifter is 100 µm long for a total of 8 phase shifters in each arm); a first transmission line (TL) (which receives "RF input" in fig. 1(b) and "RF in" in fig. 1(d)) extending along the first waveguide arm configured for transmitting an RF electrical signal to the first plurality of phase shifters and/or the second plurality of phase shifters for modulating the input optical signal [[and]]; and a first inductor ("Integrated inductor" in fig. 1(d); section 2 first paragraph states that "One 385 pH inductor is periodically integrated into the electrode for every 400 μm of optical PN junction length"; thus there are two integrated inductors added to the first TL as shown in fig. 1(c)) in the first transmission line configured for increasing impedance of the optical modulator (second paragraph of section 2: "[the integrated inductors] facilitate a 50 Ω impedance match in the distributed electrode"; "This large capacitance requires additional inductance to realize a 50 Ω effective electrode characteristic impedance" (emphasis added)). Claim 2: The first inductor comprises a plurality of first inductors spaced along the first transmission line (two inductors as shown in fig. 1(c)). Claim 3: The plurality of first inductors are equally spaced along the first transmission line. Claim 4: The plurality of first inductors each have a same inductance value (385 pH as stated in the first paragraph of section 2). Claim 9: Each of the plurality of first inductors has a value of a 50 pH to 5000 pH (385 pH). Claim 10: Each of the plurality of first inductors has a value of a 100 pH to 500 pH (385 pH). Claim 15: The first plurality of phase shifters each comprise a plurality of series-connected phase shifter sections (the 8 100 µm long phase shifter sections of the first arm are arranged as 4 pairs of series-connected sections). Claim 18: The optical modulator further comprising a termination resistor in the first transmission line with a resistance configured for providing velocity matching between the RF electrical signal and the input optical signal to compensate for delays caused by the first inductor (first sentence of section 3). Claims 1-2 and 18-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2019/0324345 A1. Claim 1: '345 discloses an optical modulator comprising (see mainly figs. 2 and 7): an input optical port 141 for receiving an input light signal 101; an output optical port 142 for outputting a modulated light signal 103; a first waveguide arm 111 and a second waveguide arm 112 extending between the input optical port and the output optical port to guide the input light signal from the input optical port to the output optical port; a first plurality of phase shifters 121 in the first waveguide arm[[,]]; a second plurality of phase shifters 122 in the second waveguide arm[[,]]; a first transmission line (TL) 131 extending along the first waveguide arm configured for transmitting an RF electrical signal to the first plurality of phase shifters and/or the second plurality of phase shifters for modulating the input optical signal [[and]]; and a first inductor MiM 328 (figs. 7A-7D) in the first transmission line configured for increasing impedance of the optical modulator ([0083] especially last sentence; and [0084] especially first sentence). Claim 2: The first inductor comprises a plurality of first inductors spaced along the first transmission line (fig. 8A, [0084]). Claim 18: The optical modulator further comprises a termination resistor 113 (fig. 2) in the first transmission line 131 with a resistance configured for providing velocity matching between the RF electrical signal and the input optical signal to compensate for delays caused by the first inductor. Claim 19: Each of the first plurality of phase shifters 121 comprises a first anode electrode 121a and a first cathode electrode 121k; each of the second plurality of phase shifters 122 comprises a second anode electrode 122a and a second cathode electrode 122k; the first transmission line 131 is electrically coupled to the first anode electrode of each of the first plurality of phase shifters, and to the second cathode electrode of each of the second plurality of phase shifters (figs. 2-3); the optical modulator further comprises: a second transmission line (TL) 132, which extends along the second waveguide arm 112, and is electrically coupled to the first cathode electrode of each of the first plurality of phase shifters and to the second anode electrode of each of the second plurality of phase shifters; a second inductor MiM 328 (figs. 7A-7D) in the second transmission line; and a differential driver 135 configured to feed complementary electrical signals into the first transmission line and the second transmission line ([0071]). Claim 20: The optical modulator further comprises: electrical circuitry configured for providing a DC bias voltage to the first cathode electrodes or the first anode electrodes of each of the first plurality of phase shifters ([0008], [0077], [0079]-[0080], fig. 5A, etc.); and AC coupling structures configured for AC-coupling each of the first cathode electrodes to the first transmission line or the second transmission line ([0077]-[0079], fig. 5A, etc.), wherein each of the first anode electrodes is either DC-coupled or AC coupled to the first transmission line or the second transmission line. Claim 21: The optical modulator further comprises a first capacitor[[s]] and a second capacitor connecting the first transmission line and the second transmission lines [[131]] to a ground electrode configured for lowering an impedance of the first transmission line and the second transmission line ([0081]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8, 11-14, and 16-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of claim 1 and all applicable intervening claims (and for claim 11, if the rewriting avoids the indefiniteness issues mentioned above). The applied references do not disclose or suggest an optical modulator which includes the additional features required by those claims in combination with all the limitations of their respective ancestor claims. Conclusion The additional references listed on the attached 892 form are considered generally relevant to the subject matter of this application. It is noted that JP 2015-129906 A was not applied because its phase shifters are essentially linear portions of the transmission line instead of being distinct elements as claim 1 requires. Contact Information Examiner: 571-272-2360 Examiner's direct supervisor: 571-272-2397 Official correspondence by fax: 571-273-8300 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Should you have questions about Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Michael Stahl/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736751
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-SPEED AND LONG DEPTH RANGE IMAGING USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730261
PILLAR STRUCTURES ON AN OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724204
Photonic chip and infrared imaging system using such a photonic chip
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724210
FIBER INSPECTION TOOL WITH MANUAL ADJUSTMENT
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717081
TEMPERATURE INSENSITIVE WAVEGUIDES AND ARRAY WAVEGUIDE GRATING MUX/DEMUX DEVICES
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.5%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1279 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month