Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/815,095

INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2020007253 +1 more
Examiner
HSU, AMY R
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
754 granted / 871 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
881
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 871 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 14-25 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,108,142. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they contain substantially the same claim elements, for example the elements of independent claim 14 are listed below next to a corresponding claim element from the ‘142 patent. Claim 14 of instant application 18/815095 Corresponding claim element from U.S. Patent No. 12,108,142 a plurality of built-in camera lenses having different focal lengths a plurality of built-in camera lenses having different focal lengths (claim 1 of ‘142) a hardware key on a side surface of the electronic device, wherein the hardware key is configured to perform a shutter operation a camera key on a side surface of the electronic device, and the camera key performs a shutter operation (claim 8 of ‘142) a touch screen a touch screen (claim 8 of ‘142) a processor configured to: control the touch screen to display a first item to select a photographing mode, a second item to select a photographing camera lens for photographing from the plurality of built-in camera lenses, and a third item to set an exposure control parameter displaying a photographing mode selection screen to select a photographing mode, a lens selection screen to select a photographing camera lens for photographing from the plurality of built-in camera lenses, and an exposure control parameter setting screen to set an exposure control parameter (claim 1 of ‘142) in a case where one side of the touch screen of the electronic device that faces the hardware key is an upper side, control the touch screen to display the third item on a right side of the touch screen when one side of the touch screen of the electronic device facing the camera key is an upper side, the exposure control parameter setting screen is displayed in an operation area along a right side of the touch screen Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMY R HSU whose telephone number is (571)270-3012. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at (571)272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. AMY R. HSU Examiner Art Unit 2664 /AMY R HSU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 10, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Mar 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750601
PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION APPARATUS, PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION SYSTEM, AND MOVING OBJECT
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750609
IMAGE SENSOR AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745009
SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739485
IMAGING APPARATUS
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732676
VARIABLE FOCAL LENGTH LENS DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-1.2%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 871 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month