Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/815,232

CARTRIDGE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN EARPIECE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 26, 2023 — EU 23206143.2
Examiner
YI, STELLA KIM
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sonova AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
678 granted / 961 resolved
+5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
980
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
72.5%
+32.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 13-20 in the reply filed on 01/20/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-12 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 01/20/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the earpiece" in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the earpiece" in lines 3 and 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 20 recites the limitation "the earpiece" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13 and 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by VOIT et al. (2016/0200044). Regarding claim 13, VOIT et al. discloses a method for producing at least one Earpiece [0037], the method comprising: providing a cartridge comprising a transparent vial [0045], at least partially filled with a curable liquid printing material [0032], [0046], a cap sealing the vial [0045] and at least one solid structure submerged in the liquid printing material ([0041], claim 16), inserting the cartridge into a printer configured for volumetric 3D printing [0029], providing the printer with data for the earpiece to be printed, determining a location of the submerged solid structure using optical means, printing the at least one earpiece around the at least one solid structure by volumetric 3D printing using the printer, extracting the at least one earpiece from the cartridge [0029]. Regarding claims 15-16, VOIT et al. discloses perforating the cap [0046] and post processing steps [0038]. Regarding claim 17, VOIT et al. discloses UV curing [0030]. Claim(s) 13-15 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by GENTRY et al. (WO 2021/096873). Regarding claims 13 and 20, GENTRY et al. discloses a method for producing at least one earpiece for a hearing instrument, the method comprising: providing a cartridge comprising a transparent vial [0047], at least partially filled with a curable liquid printing material ([0059], Fig.4-container 402), a cap sealing the vial and at least one solid structure submerged in the liquid printing material, inserting the cartridge into a printer configured for volumetric 3D printing (Fig.5), [0065], providing the printer with data (a computer-readable medium, claim 29) for the earpiece to be printed, determining a location of the submerged solid structure using optical means [0074], printing the at least one earpiece around the at least one solid structure by volumetric 3D printing using the printer (Fig.5, [0065]), extracting the at least one earpiece from the cartridge [0108]. Regarding claim 14, GENTRY et al. discloses radiating light beams [0063]-[0064]. Regarding claim 15, GENTRY et al. discloses removing the plug [0105], [0118]. Regarding claim 18, GENTRY et al. discloses removing the at least one earpiece [0089]. Regarding claim 19, GENTRY et al. discloses the at least one solid structure comprises a microphone [0092]-[0094]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: a) SUN et al. (2018/0000570) discloses three-dimensional fabrication. b) SCHMIDT (EP 4601320) discloses earpiece for a hearing device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STELLA KIM YI whose telephone number is (571)270-5123. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STELLA YI Examiner Art Unit 1742 /STELLA K YI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629754
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL SCREEN-PRINTED WORKPIECES
4y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623378
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623379
Method For Producing A Lining Part For A Vehicle, And Lining Part Produced Using Said Method
1y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617130
MANUFACTURING OF MOLDED ARTICLE USING A COMPOSITION FOR MOLDING CONTAINING A PYROLYTIC WATER DISCHARGE SUBSTANCE AND A FIBROIN
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611802
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MOLDED ARTICLE OF FIBROIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.1%)
3y 2m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month