Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/815,240

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REPETITIVE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF UPLINK DATA FOR NETWORK COOPERATIVE COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0027563 +1 more
Examiner
SCHEIBEL, ROBERT C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
657 granted / 814 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
843
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 814 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-5 and 7-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu et al (US 2023/0047048) in view of OPPO (R1-2201228 – “Enhancements on SRS flexibility, coverage and capacity”). Regarding claim 1: Liu discloses a method of transmitting a sounding reference signal (SRS) by an electronic device in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: receiving configuration information including a first configuration for SRS resource sets (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”); identifying, based on the first configuration, that a usage of the SRS resource sets is configured to be antenna switching (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the configuration indicates that the SRS resources in the SRS resource sets are “for antenna switching”; the UE receiving this configuration identifies that the usage of these SRS resource sets is for antenna switching; see also [0083], which indicates that SRS resource sets can be configured for “different purposes”, one of which is ”antenna switching”); and transmitting the SRS, based on x antennas among y reception antennas of the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see [0086]-[0087], for example, which indicates that the terminology “xTyR” is used to indicate transmitting SRS with x antennas among y available antennas to receive signals; see also step 1203 of Figure 12, for example), wherein y is a natural number equal to or greater than 6, and x is a natural number equal to or smaller than y (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example). Liu does not disclose the limitations wherein a number of the SRS resource sets associated with the SRS transmission is determined based on whether capability information of the electronic device associated with a resource type of the SRS in a time domain is reported. However, OPPO discloses, analogous art regarding enhancements to SRS flexibility, coverage, and capacity. OPPO further discloses near the end of section 3 (SRS antenna switching): “[f]or 4T8R, up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is not indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets], or up to two SRS resource sets configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets]”. That is, OPPO discloses configuring a different number of SRS resource sets depending on whether capability information associated with a resource type (semi-persistent or periodic) is reported. Specifically, for a semi-persistent resource type, if the UE “is not indicating a capability”, up to one resource set is configured and if the UE “is indicating a capability”, up to two SRS resource sets are configured. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu such that the number of SRS resource sets depends on whether capability information associated with a resource type (such as semi-persistent) is indicated/reported as suggested by OPPO. The rationale for doing so would have been to enhance SRS for additional antennas while still supporting legacy or older devices that do not support the new capability. Regarding claim 7: Liu discloses an electronic device for transmitting a sounding reference signal (SRS) in a wireless communication system, the electronic device comprising: memory storing one or more computer programs (see memory 204 of Figure 2, for example); a transceiver (see transmitter 210 and/or receiver 212 of Figure 2, for example) configured to receive configuration information including a first configuration for SRS resource sets (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”); and one or more processors communicatively coupled to the memory and the transceiver (see processor 202 of Figure 2, for example), wherein the one or more computer programs include computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to (see [0068]-[0070], for example): identify, based on the first configuration, that a usage of the SRS resource sets is configured to be antenna switching (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the configuration indicates that the SRS resources in the SRS resource sets are “for antenna switching”; the UE receiving this configuration identifies that the usage of these SRS resource sets is for antenna switching; see also [0083], which indicates that SRS resource sets can be configured for “different purposes”, one of which is ”antenna switching”), and transmit the SRS, based on x antennas among y reception antennas of the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see [0086]-[0087], for example, which indicates that the terminology “xTyR” is used to indicate transmitting SRS with x antennas among y available antennas to receive signals; see also step 1203 of Figure 12, for example), wherein y is a natural number equal to or greater than 6, and x is a natural number equal to or smaller than y (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example). Liu does not disclose the limitations wherein a number of the SRS resource sets associated with the SRS transmission is determined based on whether capability information of the electronic device associated with a resource type of the SRS in a time domain is reported. However, OPPO discloses, analogous art regarding enhancements to SRS flexibility, coverage, and capacity. OPPO further discloses near the end of section 3 (SRS antenna switching): “[f]or 4T8R, up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is not indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets], or up to two SRS resource sets configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets]”. That is, OPPO discloses configuring a different number of SRS resource sets depending on whether capability information associated with a resource type (semi-persistent or periodic) is reported. Specifically, for a semi-persistent resource type, if the UE “is not indicating a capability”, up to one resource set is configured and if the UE “is indicating a capability”, up to two SRS resource sets are configured. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu such that the number of SRS resource sets depends on whether capability information associated with a resource type (such as semi-persistent) is indicated/reported as suggested by OPPO. The rationale for doing so would have been to enhance SRS for additional antennas while still supporting legacy or older devices that do not support the new capability. Regarding claim 11: Liu discloses a method of receiving a sounding reference signal (SRS) by a base station (BS) in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: transmitting, to an electronic device, configuration information including a first configuration for SRS resource sets (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the UE receives the SRS configuration from a base station); and receiving the SRS transmitted based on x antennas among y reception antennas of the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see [0086]-[0087], for example, which indicates that the terminology “xTyR” is used to indicate transmitting SRS with x antennas among y available antennas to receive signals; see also step 1203 of Figure 12, for example), wherein a usage of the SRS resource sets is configured to be antenna switching, based on the first configuration (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the configuration indicates that the SRS resources in the SRS resource sets are “for antenna switching”; the UE receiving this configuration identifies that the usage of these SRS resource sets is for antenna switching; see also [0083], which indicates that SRS resource sets can be configured for “different purposes”, one of which is ”antenna switching”), wherein y is a natural number equal to or greater than 6, and x is a natural number equal to or smaller than y (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example). Liu does not disclose the limitations wherein a number of the SRS resource sets associated with the SRS transmission is determined based on whether capability information of the electronic device associated with a resource type of the SRS in a time domain is reported. However, OPPO discloses, analogous art regarding enhancements to SRS flexibility, coverage, and capacity. OPPO further discloses near the end of section 3 (SRS antenna switching): “[f]or 4T8R, up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is not indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets], or up to two SRS resource sets configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets]”. That is, OPPO discloses configuring a different number of SRS resource sets depending on whether capability information associated with a resource type (semi-persistent or periodic) is reported. Specifically, for a semi-persistent resource type, if the UE “is not indicating a capability”, up to one resource set is configured and if the UE “is indicating a capability”, up to two SRS resource sets are configured. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu such that the number of SRS resource sets depends on whether capability information associated with a resource type (such as semi-persistent) is indicated/reported as suggested by OPPO. The rationale for doing so would have been to enhance SRS for additional antennas while still supporting legacy or older devices that do not support the new capability. Regarding claim 15: Liu discloses a base station (BS) for receiving a sounding reference signal (SRS) in a wireless communication system, the base station comprising: memory storing one or more computer programs (see memory 304 of Figure 3, for example); a transceiver (see transmitter 310 and/or receiver 312 of Figure 3, for example) configured to transmit, to an electronic device, configuration information including a first configuration on SRS resource sets (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the UE receives the SRS configuration from a base station), and receive the SRS transmitted based on x antennas among y reception antennas of the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see [0086]-[0087], for example, which indicates that the terminology “xTyR” is used to indicate transmitting SRS with x antennas among y available antennas to receive signals; see also step 1203 of Figure 12, for example); and one or more processors communicatively coupled to the memory and the transceiver (see processor 302 of Figure 3, for example), wherein a usage of the SRS resource sets is configured to be antenna switching, based on the first configuration (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the configuration indicates that the SRS resources in the SRS resource sets are “for antenna switching”; the UE receiving this configuration identifies that the usage of these SRS resource sets is for antenna switching; see also [0083], which indicates that SRS resource sets can be configured for “different purposes”, one of which is ”antenna switching”), wherein y is a natural number equal to or greater than 6, and x is a natural number equal to or smaller than y (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example). Liu does not disclose the limitations wherein a number of the SRS resource sets associated with the SRS transmission is determined based on whether capability information of the electronic device associated with a resource type of the SRS in a time domain is reported. However, OPPO discloses, analogous art regarding enhancements to SRS flexibility, coverage, and capacity. OPPO further discloses near the end of section 3 (SRS antenna switching): “[f]or 4T8R, up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is not indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets], or up to two SRS resource sets configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets]”. That is, OPPO discloses configuring a different number of SRS resource sets depending on whether capability information associated with a resource type (semi-persistent or periodic) is reported. Specifically, for a semi-persistent resource type, if the UE “is not indicating a capability”, up to one resource set is configured and if the UE “is indicating a capability”, up to two SRS resource sets are configured. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu such that the number of SRS resource sets depends on whether capability information associated with a resource type (such as semi-persistent) is indicated/reported as suggested by OPPO. The rationale for doing so would have been to enhance SRS for additional antennas while still supporting legacy or older devices that do not support the new capability. Regarding claim 16: Liu discloses one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors individually or collectively, cause an electronic device in a wireless communication system to perform operations, the operations comprising (disclosed throughout; processor 202 and memory 204 of Figure 2 and [0068]-[0070], for example): receiving configuration information including a first configuration for SRS resource sets (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”); identifying, based on the first configuration, that a usage of the SRS resource sets is configured to be antenna switching (disclosed throughout; see step 1202 of Figure 12 and [0171], for example, which disclose that “the UE receives an SRS configuration” where “[o]ne or more SRS resource sets are configured with each consisting of one or more SRS resources for antenna switching in the SRS configuration”; the configuration indicates that the SRS resources in the SRS resource sets are “for antenna switching”; the UE receiving this configuration identifies that the usage of these SRS resource sets is for antenna switching; see also [0083], which indicates that SRS resource sets can be configured for “different purposes”, one of which is ”antenna switching”); and transmitting the SRS, based on x antennas among y reception antennas of the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see [0086]-[0087], for example, which indicates that the terminology “xTyR” is used to indicate transmitting SRS with x antennas among y available antennas to receive signals; see also step 1203 of Figure 12, for example), wherein y is a natural number equal to or greater than 6, and x is a natural number equal to or smaller than y (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example). Liu does not disclose the limitations wherein a number of the SRS resource sets associated with the SRS transmission is determined based on whether capability information of the electronic device associated with a resource type of the SRS in a time domain is reported. However, OPPO discloses, analogous art regarding enhancements to SRS flexibility, coverage, and capacity. OPPO further discloses near the end of section 3 (SRS antenna switching): “[f]or 4T8R, up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is not indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets], or up to two SRS resource sets configured with ‘semi-persistent’ and up to one SRS resource set configured with ‘periodic’ if the UE is indicating a capability for [maximum 2 semi-persistent and maximum 1 periodic SRS resource sets]”. That is, OPPO discloses configuring a different number of SRS resource sets depending on whether capability information associated with a resource type (semi-persistent or periodic) is reported. Specifically, for a semi-persistent resource type, if the UE “is not indicating a capability”, up to one resource set is configured and if the UE “is indicating a capability”, up to two SRS resource sets are configured. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu such that the number of SRS resource sets depends on whether capability information associated with a resource type (such as semi-persistent) is indicated/reported as suggested by OPPO. The rationale for doing so would have been to enhance SRS for additional antennas while still supporting legacy or older devices that do not support the new capability. Regarding claims 2, 12, and 17: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations wherein y is equal to 8 (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example), and wherein, in case that the capability information associated with a semi-persistent SRS resource type is reported, the number of the SRS resource sets is determined to be 2 (disclosed throughout; in the combination, when the capability is indicated/reported, the number of SRS resource sets can be up to two when the resource type is semi-persistent and thus, in one example, the number of resource sets is two; see OPPO near the end of section 3 as discussed in the combination above). Regarding claims 3 and 18: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations wherein multiple SRS resource sets of a semi-persistent type are configured through radio resource control (RRC) signaling, based on the first configuration (disclosed throughout; see at least [0104] of Liu, which discloses that the SRS resource sets are configured “by RRC signaling”; as indicated above, in the combination of Liu and OPPO, multiple SRS resource sets (up to two) can be configured with a semi-persistent resource type), and wherein one of the multiple SRS resource sets is activated through medium access control-control element (MAC-CE) signaling (disclosed throughout; see [0079] of Liu, for example, which discloses that “[a] semi-persistent SRS has a configured periodicity and slot offset…actual SRS transmission according to the configured periodicity and slot offset is activated and deactivated by means of MAC CE signaling”). Regarding claims 4, 9, and 19: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations of transmitting information on an SRS antenna switching capability supported by the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see the abstract and [0170] of Liu, which disclose that the “UE reports its capability indicating the supported SRS transmission port switching”; as indicated throughout (see [0146], for example), the SRS ports are associated with antenna ports and thus the capability is an SRS antenna switching capability supported by the UE), wherein the information comprises a parameter indicating that antenna switching in case that y is equal to 6 or 8 is supported (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example). Regarding claims 5, 10, 14, and 20: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations of parent claims 1, 7, 11, and 16. Liu further discloses the limitation wherein multiple SRS resources included in one SRS resource set are transmitted over multiple slots (disclosed throughout; see [0027], for example, which discloses “a total of 4 SRS resources are transmitted in different symbols of two different slots”). Liu does not explicitly disclose the limitations of claims 5, 10, 14, and 20 wherein x is equal to 8, wherein a subcarrier spacing at which the SRS is transmitted is 480 kHz or 960 kHz. However, Liu discloses progressively increasing the values of x and y in the configuration xTyR. For example, see the capabilities listed in [0170] (1T6R, 2T6R, 4T6R, 1T8R, 2T8R and 4T8R). Further, Liu discloses an increasing subcarrier spacing that doubles with each increase (see Table 2, which discloses SCS values of 15 kHz, 30 kHz, 60 kHz, and 120 kHz). To the extent that Liu does not explicitly disclose x equal to 8 and subcarrier spacing at which the SRS is transmitted being 480 kHz or 960 kHz, this would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In particular, it would have been obvious to continue improving the system by utilizing more antennas and larger subcarrier spacing in a manner similar to how they had already been increased in Liu. The rationale for doing so would have been to increase data rates, improve spectral efficiency and lower latency. Regarding claim 8: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations wherein, in case that the capability information associated with a semi-persistent SRS resource type is reported, the number of the SRS resource sets is determined to be 2 (disclosed throughout; in the combination, when the capability is indicated/reported, the number of SRS resource sets can be up to two when the resource type is semi-persistent and thus, in one example, the number of resource sets is two; see OPPO near the end of section 3 as discussed in the combination above), wherein two SRS resource sets of a semi-persistent type are configured through radio resource control (RRC) signaling, based on the first configuration (disclosed throughout; see at least [0104] of Liu, which discloses that the SRS resource sets are configured “by RRC signaling”; as indicated above, in the combination of Liu and OPPO, multiple SRS resource sets (up to two) can be configured with a semi-persistent resource type), and wherein one of multiple SRS resource sets is activated through medium access control-control element (MAC-CE) signaling (disclosed throughout; see [0079] of Liu, for example, which discloses that “[a] semi-persistent SRS has a configured periodicity and slot offset…actual SRS transmission according to the configured periodicity and slot offset is activated and deactivated by means of MAC CE signaling”). Regarding claim 13: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations of receiving information on an SRS antenna switching capability supported by the electronic device (disclosed throughout; see the abstract and [0170] of Liu, which disclose that the “UE reports its capability indicating the supported SRS transmission port switching”; as indicated throughout (see [0146], for example), the SRS ports are associated with antenna ports and thus the capability is an SRS antenna switching capability supported by the UE), wherein the information comprises a parameter indicating that antenna switching in case that y is equal to 6 or 8 is supported (disclosed throughout; see the various “xTyR” examples; in particular, consider 4T6R and 4T8R described in [0106] and [0170], for example), wherein multiple SRS resource sets of a semi-persistent type are configured through radio resource control (RRC) signaling, based on the first configuration (disclosed throughout; see at least [0104] of Liu, which discloses that the SRS resource sets are configured “by RRC signaling”; as indicated above, in the combination of Liu and OPPO, multiple SRS resource sets (up to two) can be configured with a semi-persistent resource type), and wherein one of the multiple SRS resource sets is activated through medium access control-control element (MAC-CE) signaling (disclosed throughout; see [0079] of Liu, for example, which discloses that “[a] semi-persistent SRS has a configured periodicity and slot offset…actual SRS transmission according to the configured periodicity and slot offset is activated and deactivated by means of MAC CE signaling”). Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu et al (US 2023/0047048) in view of OPPO (R1-2201228 – “Enhancements on SRS flexibility, coverage and capacity”) in view of Nilsson et al (US 2025/0125927) in view of Shahmohammadian et al (US 2022/0029861). Regarding claim 6: Liu, modified, discloses the limitations of parent claim 1 as indicated above. Liu does not explicitly disclose the limitations of claim 6. However, Nilsson discloses the limitations of claim 8 of: wherein the configuration information comprises a second configuration for an SRS resource (see the configuration of an SRS resource disclosed in [0021]-[0026], for example), wherein the second configuration comprises a first parameter indicating a number of SRS ports (see [0021] “[t]he number of SRS ports (1, 2, or 4), configured by the RRC parameter nrofSRS-Ports”), a second parameter for a configuration of a transmission comb (see [0021] “[t]he transmission comb (i.e., mapping to every 2nd or 4th subcarrier), configured by the RRC parameter transmissionComb”), and a third parameter indicating a position of the SRS resource (see [0021] “[t]he time-domain position within a given slot, configured with the RRC parameter resourceMapping”), wherein the first parameter is configured to be 8 ports (see [0047] “the SRS resource configuration comprises an SRS resource for 6 or 8 SRS ports”), wherein the second parameter comprises a first sub parameter indicating a comb offset corresponding to the 8 ports (disclosed throughout; see [0042] “a new mapping of SRS ports to comb offsets and cyclic shifts”) and a second sub parameter indicating a cyclic shift (disclosed throughout; see [0042] “a new mapping of SRS ports to comb offsets and cyclic shifts”), and wherein the third parameter comprises a number of SRS symbols in a slot (disclosed throughout; see [0025], which discloses the nrofSymbols parameter). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu, modified, to include additional SRS resource configuration such as that indicated in Nilsson. The rationale for doing so would have been to improve the flexibility of resource assignment. Liu-OPPO-Nilsson does not explicitly disclose the limitations that the third parameter comprising a number of SRS symbols in a slot is configured to be 8. However, Shahmohammadian discloses a similar method for configuring SRS resources. Further, Shahmohammadian discloses using larger values (such as 8) for the number of SRS symbols in each slot (see [0170], for example, which indicates that NsymbSRS can be one of {1,2,4,8,12}). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Liu-OPPO-Nilsson so the number of SRS symbols in a slot is 8 as suggested by Shahmohammadian. The rationale for doing so would have been to improve SRS coverage as suggested by Shahmohammadian in [0170]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sun et al (US 2022/0303973) discloses an SRS antenna switching enhancement. Duan et al (US 2021/0112498) discloses a method for SRS antenna switching for multiple receive antennas. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert C Scheibel whose telephone number is (571)272-3169. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan A Phillips can be reached at 571-272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Robert C. Scheibel Primary Examiner Art Unit 2467 /Robert C Scheibel/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467 August 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745173
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733041
CLOUD-CENTRIC DESIGN FOR ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) INFRASTRUCTURE-BASED POSITIONING
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12713340
BASE STATION AND TERMINAL APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713356
NEW MODE IN POWER SAVING MODE (PSM)'S ACTIVE TIME DURATION
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12701548
PRE-PAGING FOR DEEP COVERAGE SCENARIOS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 814 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month