Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/815,696

Device and Method to Improve Horizontal and Vertical Positioning Accuracy

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Priority
Jan 26, 2015 — provisional 62/107,665 +4 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, DAVID Q
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
868 granted / 954 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
966
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 954 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,225,495 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the subject matter claimed in the instant application is fully disclosed in the reference US 12,225,495 B2. The reference and instant application are claiming common subject matter, as follows: The instant application 18/815,696 US 12,225,495 B2 1. receiving a positioning protocol message, from a location server, comprising positioning reference signal (PRS) information that includes first and second PRS configurations for the cell, that have respective periodicities and respective offsets; and obtain, for transmission to a base station, measurements of time difference of arrival (TDOA) based on the first and second PRSs. 2. decoding first PRSs based on the first PRS configuration and second PRSs based on the second PRS configuration. 3. wherein the first PRSs and the second PRSs are decoded in consecutive downlink subframes, wherein the consecutive downlink subframes exclude one or more subframes, wherein each of the one or more subframes comprises at least one of a primary synchronization signal (PSS) and a secondary synchronization signal (SSS). 4. wherein the first PRSs and second PRSs are associated with different antenna ports of a base station. 5. wherein the first and second PRSs are quasi-co-located. 6. wherein the first PRS configuration comprises a legacy PRS configuration, wherein the second PRS configuration comprises a non-legacy PRS configuration. 7. wherein the PRS information includes a first PRS information element that includes the first and second PRS configurations for the cell. Claim 8. decode a positioning protocol message, from a location server, comprising positioning reference signal (PRS) information for a cell for use in performing measurements of time difference of arrival (TDOA), wherein the PRS information comprises a first PRS information element, wherein the first PRS information element includes a first PRS configuration and a second PRS configuration for the cell, wherein the first and second PRS configurations have respective periodicities and respective offsets. Claim 12. encode, for transmission to a base station, measurements based on the first and second PRSs. Claim 16. decode first PRSs based on a first PRS configuration indicated by the first PRS configuration index; and decode second PRSs based on a second PRS configuration indicated by the second PRS configuration index. Claim 17. wherein the first PRSs and the second PRSs are decoded in consecutive downlink subframes, wherein the consecutive downlink subframes exclude one or more subframes, wherein each of the one or more subframes comprises at least one of a primary synchronization signal (PSS) and a secondary synchronization signal (SSS). Claim 18. wherein the first PRSs and second PRSs are associated with different antenna ports of a base station. Claim 13. wherein the first and second PRSs are quasi-co-located. Claim 14. wherein the first PRS configuration comprises a legacy PRS configuration, wherein the second PRS configuration comprises a non-legacy PRS configuration Claim 15. wherein the PRS information comprises at least a first PRS information element and a second PRS information element, wherein the first PRS information element includes a first PRS configuration index for the cell Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1-20, the closest prior art, EDGE et al. (US 2015/0365790 A1) teach receiving a positioning protocol message, from a location server, comprising positioning reference signal (PRS) information. However, the prior art fails to teach a message decoded by the UE that comprises PRS information including 'a first PRS configuration and a second PRS configuration for the cell, as specified in claims 1-20. Therefore, they are allowable. Claims 1-20 are allowable if a timely filed terminal disclaimer is filed to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference patent. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID Q NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-7844. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinsong Hu can be reached at 5712723965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID Q NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701538
LOS PROBABILITY MAP SIGNALING
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700914
AERIAL REPEATER POSITION DETERMINATION APPARATUS, AERIAL REPEATER POSITION DETERMINATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM AERIAL REPEATER POSITION DETERMINATION METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12684564
Managing Uplink Transmission Latency
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684423
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672027
METHOD FOR CIPHERING EMM TRANSPORT MESSAGE
11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 954 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month