Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/815,818

DUAL-DEPLOYMENT SUTURE PLACEMENT & ANESTHESIA DELIVERY APPLIANCE AND RELATED DEVICES AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Examiner
YABUT, DIANE D
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
New Wave Endo-Surgical Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
539 granted / 862 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
888
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 862 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 1 recites “The suture placement device of claim 3” and should rather read as --The dual-deployment suture placement and injection device of claim 3--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 7 reads “a top portion of the housing” and should rather read as --the top portion of the housing--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 1 recites “The suture placement device of Claim 4” and should rather read as --The dual-deployment suture placement and injection device of Claim 4--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 1 recites “The suture placement device of Claim 4” and should rather read as --The dual-deployment suture placement and injection device of Claim 4--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 1 recites “The suture placement device of Claim 4” and should rather read as --The dual-deployment suture placement and injection device of Claim 4--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 4 recites “a proximal side portions” and should rather read as --proximal side portions--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 6 reads “the suture placement device” and should rather read as --the dual-deployment suture placement and injection device--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 5 recites “a first side of the housing” and should rather read as --the first side of the housing--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 7 recites “a second side of the housing” and should rather read as --the second side of the housing--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3, line 10 recites the limitation "the third stylet guide”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For examination purposes, the limitation will be red as --the third channel guide--. Claims 4-7 are rejected due to their dependency on claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 8-20 are allowed. Claims 3-7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: None of the prior art of record, alone or in combination, teaches or renders obvious a dual-deployment suture placement and injection device including, inter alia, a cannular housing comprising a suture guide mechanism movably coupled to a distal portion of the cannular housing arranged for movement between a deployed position and a non-deployed position, the guide mechanism defining a first receptor port, a second receptor port, and suture passage therebetween, wherein the suture passage extends across a width of the cannular housing in the deployed position, first and second channel guides within the housing each having a guided suture path segment and movable between a retracted position and a deployed position, wherein a portion of the first channel guide extends from the housing to the first receptor port and a portion of the second channel guide extends from the housing to the second receptor port in the deployed position, third and fourth channel guides within the housing each having an injection path segment and movable between a retracted position and a deployed position, wherein a portion of the third channel guide extends from a first side of the housing to a first injection position, and wherein a portion of the fourth channel guide extends from a second side of the housing to a second injection position, and actuation of a channel guide deployment mechanism deploys the first, second, third, and fourth channel guides to each respective deployed positions. Patel et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2017/0105712) discloses a dual-deployment suture placement and injection device (Figures 43A-53) including a cannular housing 510 comprising a suture guide mechanism 550 movably coupled to a distal portion of the cannular housing arranged for movement between a deployed position (Figure 43B) and a non-deployed position (Figure 43A), the guide mechanism defining a first receptor port 554, a second receptor port 555, and suture passage 551 therebetween, wherein the suture passage extends across a width of the cannular housing in the deployed position (Figure 44C), first and second channel guides 560, 570 within the housing each having a guided suture path segment and movable between a retracted position (Figure 43B) and a deployed position (Figure 43C), wherein a portion of the first channel guide extends from the housing to the first receptor port and a portion of the second channel guide extends from the housing to the second receptor port in the deployed position (Id.), and actuation of a channel guide deployment mechanism 540 deploys the first and second, channel guides to each respective deployed positions ([0371]). Similarly, Maruyama et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2005/0228405) discloses a suture placement device including a cannular housing 2 comprising a suture guide mechanism 3 movably coupled to a distal portion of the cannular housing arranged for movement between a deployed position (Figure 9) and a non-deployed position (Figure 7), the guide mechanism defining a first receptor port 31, a second receptor port 32, and suture passage 33 therebetween, wherein the suture passage extends across a width of the cannular housing in the deployed position (Figures 11-13), first and second channel guides 4, 5 within the housing each having a guided suture path segment and movable between a retracted position (Figure 9) and a deployed position (Figures 10-13), wherein a portion of the first channel guide extends from the housing to the first receptor port and a portion of the second channel guide extends from the housing to the second receptor port in the deployed position (Id.), and actuation of a channel guide deployment mechanism 6 deploys the first and second, channel guides to each respective deployed positions ([0101]). However, Patel et al. and Maruyama et al. do not disclose third and fourth channel guides within the housing each having an injection path segment (although in [0384] Patel et al. teaches the first and second channel guides or stylet guides serve as injection tubes) and movable between a retracted position and a deployed position, wherein a portion of the third channel guide extends from a first side of the housing to a first injection position, and wherein a portion of the fourth channel guide extends from a second side of the housing to a second injection position. Diaz (U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,065) teaches first, second, third, and fourth channel guides 34 (Figure 1) that each have suture path segments and may movably extend within a cannular housing 15 and extend from the housing into recess 56 and portions 38. However, as mentioned above, in [0384] Patel et al. already teaches the first and second channel guides or stylet guides can serve as both suture paths and injection tubes, and therefore one of ordinary skill in the art would not have found it obvious to provide additional third and fourth channel guides each having injection path segments and movable between a retracted position to a deployed, injection position, and wherein a channel guide deployment mechanism deploys the first, second, third, and fourth channel guides to each respective deployed positions. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIANE D YABUT whose telephone number is (571)272-6831. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 571-272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIANE D YABUT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740784
CLIP APPLIER HAVING STABILIZING MEMBER
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727911
Interface For Accessing The Interior Of A Heart
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721717
Assembly for Aortic End-to-Side Anastamosis
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721619
THREAD SUTURING ENDOSCOPIC DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714587
SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR THE ACCURATE DEPLOYMENT AND IMAGING OF AN IMPLANT IN THE PROSTATIC URETHRA
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+27.9%)
4y 3m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 862 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month