Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/816,409

TRAY FOR SOFT MATERIALS AND METHODS OF LOADING TRAYS WITH SOFT MATERIALS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Examiner
ACKUN, JACOB K
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Meaty Meats Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
58%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
717 granted / 1272 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1308
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.0%
+30.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1272 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of the invention of Group II, claims 6-13, drawn to a method of loading a tray with fresh meat articles, in the reply filed on 12/16/25 is acknowledged. Claims 1-5 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/16/25. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Whitehouse (4,776,146). Whitehouse discloses most of the features of the claims including: the propelling step of claim 1 (with reference to Whitehouse Figs 2 and 3, the first conveyor line can be conveyor 22 in Figs 2 and 3; the second conveyor line can be conveyor 32 with tray 90 thereon); the detecting step of claim 1 (see sensors 94 and 96 and their functions, as disclosed in Whitesouse); the determining step of claim 1 (see, for example, column 7 fourth full paragraph and column 10 line 15+); and the moving step of claim 1 (see, for example, column 6 lines 20-30 and column 7 lines 20-24). Therefore, what Whitehouse is missing is a pluraity of cells for the Whitehouse tray. On the other hand, providing a meat tray with cells is conventional, as shown by the prior art of record including Childress and Maynard. Thus, in Whitehouse, it would have been obvious to perform the propelling step with a tray having cells therein, for the purpose of packaging the meats in a more attractive manner. Other features of the claims not specifically disclosed in Whitehouse, such as fresh meat articles connected by links, and vacuum sealing the tray without freezing the meat articles are notorious in the relevant art. Therefore, it would also have been obvious to provide these features in the practice of the Whitehouse invention, for the purpose of more conveniently and/or attractively packaging specific types of meats. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB K ACKUN whose telephone number is (571)272-4418. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 11am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at (571) 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACOB K ACKUN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600521
RETAIL PACKAGING FOR ANGULAR BRUSH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600552
EXPANDABLE FOAM CORNER PROTECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582764
PEN NEEDLE MAGAZINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585472
CONFIGURATION OF UNPOWERED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570873
GLASSINE PAPER MATERIAL FOR WRAPPING SELF-ADHESIVE NOTE PADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
58%
With Interview (+2.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month