Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/816,508

AIR SPRINGS FOR BICYCLE FRONT FORKS AND OTHER BICYCLE COMPONENTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Examiner
KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sram LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
31%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 31% of cases
31%
Career Allowance Rate
57 granted / 184 resolved
-21.0% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+46.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
194
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 184 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to application No. 18/816,508 Air Spring for Bicycle Front Forks and Other Bicycle Components; filed on 8/27/2024. Claims 1 - 20 are currently pending and have been examined. Claim 6 is rejected as described below. Drawings The drawings filed on 08/27/2024 are acceptable subject to correction of the informalities indicated below. In order to avoid abandonment of this application, correction is required in reply to the Office action. The correction will not be held in abeyance. Fig. 8 contains two different features identified by the number 730. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6, includes the limitation “the second retaining element is coupled…and spaced from the second retaining element”. This seems to be a typo and the intended feature is either the first retaining element or the second end of the tube. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 14, and 18 allowed. In total, claims 1-5 and 7-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance. Independent claims 1, 14 and 18 are allowable because none of the cited references either alone or in combination disclose the combination of limitations as claimed. Specifically, the references fail to disclose; Regarding claim 1; a second retaining element (732) coupled to the inner surface of the tube, the second retaining element spaced further from the second end than the first retaining element is spaced from the second end, the second retaining element sized and shaped such that the second retaining element blocks the sealhead from exiting the second end of the tube. Regarding claim 14; a retaining element coupled (732) to an inner surface of the tube, the retaining element located further from the second end of the tube than from the second end of the spacer, the retaining element having an inner diameter that is less than an outer-most diameter of the sealhead, such that when the spacer is removed from the tube, the sealhead is moveable toward the second end of the tube but blocked by the retaining element from exiting the second end of the tube. Regarding claim 18; a cap (406) coupled threadably coupled to the tube, the cap having external threads that are threadably engaged with the internal threads on the tube and defining an axial interface locking length, wherein an outer side surface of the cap has a vent groove (924) that extends in an axial direction through the external threads; and a seal (910) coupled to the cap and in sealing contact with an inner surface of the tube, wherein the seal is spaced from the first end of the tube by a seal gap that is less than the axial interface locking length such that as the cap is being unscrewed from the tube, the seal loses sealing contact with the inner surface before the cap is fully decoupled from the tube and the vent groove enables fluid to vent from the sealed pressure chamber. As described in claims 1 and 14, none of the references describe a second retaining element, which functions with a sealhead and a spacer to prevent the sealhead from exiting the tube. Examples include a single retaining element which prevents the seal holder from moving out of the tube, but no references contain a second seal holder which allows the seal holder to move and break contact with the sealing surface, but not be removed from the tube, until the second retainer has been removed for the tube. As described in claim 18, no references describe a threaded cap with a vent groove in addition to a seal gap such that when unscrewing the cap, the seal is broken and the chamber is vented before the thread has disengaged the tube. Reference Chambers (US 11,661,129 B2) describes a seal holder with a threaded connection to a tube and a seal, but no retaining ring or a threaded cap with an axial vent through the threaded circumference. Reference Davis (US 4,735,402) describes a threaded cap, but no vent and no seal holder with two retainer rings. Reference Dressell (US 4,321,987 A) describes a first and second retaining ring, but these are not configured to retain a seal holder in conjunction with a sealhead (seal holder) and a spacer. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT LAWRENCE STRICKLER whose telephone number is (703)756-1961. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Fri. 9:30am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Koppikar can be reached at 571-272-5109. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT LAWRENCE STRICKLER/Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /VIVEK D KOPPIKAR/Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 3612 July 22, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12358492
Control Device and a Method for Controlling Components of a Drivetrain System of a Vehicle
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Patent 12306007
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHART THUMBNAIL IMAGE GENERATION
3y 5m to grant Granted May 20, 2025
Patent 11275390
Control System and Method for Drone with Remote Controller
2y 9m to grant Granted Mar 15, 2022
Patent 11257012
AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS OF PROCESS AND/OR OPERATIONS DATA RELATED TO A BENEFIT MANAGER ORGANIZATION
4y 6m to grant Granted Feb 22, 2022
Patent 11244572
DYNAMIC AIRCRAFT ROUTING
2y 9m to grant Granted Feb 08, 2022
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
31%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+46.2%)
4y 6m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 184 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month