Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/816,741

STRUCTURES WITH INTERLOCKING HEMS AND METHODS OF FORMING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Examiner
WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honest Structures LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1790 granted / 2169 resolved
+30.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
2206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2169 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
March 4, 2026 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In paragraph [0001] of the specification, under the “Cross-Reference to Related Applications” section of the specification, Applicant needs to insert - - now U.S. Patent No. 12,075,920 B2 - - after “This application comprises a continuation application of U.S. Application No. 17/727,399 filed April 22, 2022,” Appropriate correction is required. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “interfacing side edge 106b-3” defined in clam 1 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). Nothing in the specification has been identified as a “interfacing side edge 106b-3”. However, In Fig. 4, there is a reference numeral 106-3. Should that reference number be 106b-3 instead? See below PNG media_image1.png 351 632 media_image1.png Greyscale Applicant needs to read through the specification and compare it to the drawings to ensure that all of the reference numerals that appear in the drawings are in the specification and to ensure that all reference numerals in the specification appear in the drawings and correctly label the correct part or feature. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: As mentioned above, reference numeral “106b-3” does not appear in the drawings. As recommended above, Applicant needs to read through the specification and compare it to the drawings to ensure that all of the reference numerals that appear in the drawings are in the specification and to ensure that all reference numerals in the specification appear in the drawings and correctly label the correct part or feature. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KEKLEN et al. (U.S. Patent No. 2,572,732). PNG media_image2.png 188 385 media_image2.png Greyscale As for claim 1, KEKLEN et al. teach a structure comprising: a first body member 60 including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 38 including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. As for claim 2, KEKLEN et al. teach that each of the first interconnecting component and the second interconnecting component includes a wall having a wall length, a coupling flange extending from a wall edge and forming a receiving cavity 44 between the coupling flange and the wall, and an engaging portion 40. As for claim 4, KEKLEN et al. teach that the first body member is of a unibody construction that is a first half of the structure, and wherein the second body member is of a unibody construction that is a second half of the structure. As for claims 6-7, KEKLEN et al. teach that each of the first and second body members includes a top portion including a side edge connected to the interfacing side edge, wherein each top portion includes a side surface extending from the side edge, wherein each top portion includes first and second planar members extending from the side surface adjacent to the interfacing side edge, and wherein the first and second planar members include openings such that the openings of abutting planar members align when the first and second body members are secured together and each pair of abutting planar members receives a securing member 48,66; wherein the openings of abutting planar members align when the first and second interconnecting component of the first and second body members are secured together, and further comprising a securing member positioned within the aligned openings of the abutting planar members.. Claims 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ruggles (U.S. Patent No. 3,826,206). PNG media_image3.png 298 339 media_image3.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Ruggles teaches a structure comprising: a first body member 10 including a first interfacing side edge 44 and a first interconnecting component 52 at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 10 including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 54 at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. As for claim 4, Ruggles teaches that the first body member is of a unibody construction that is a first half of the structure, and wherein the second body member is of a unibody construction that is a second half of the structure. As for claim 6, Ruggles teaches that each of the first and second body members includes a top portion including a side edge connected to the interfacing side edge, wherein each top portion includes a side surface extending from the side edge, wherein each top portion includes first and second planar members extending from the side surface adjacent to the interfacing side edge, and wherein the first and second planar members include openings such that the openings of abutting planar members align when the first and second body members are secured together and each pair of abutting planar members receives a securing member. Claims 1 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Weiss et al. (U.S. Patent No. 7,883,149 B1). PNG media_image4.png 292 251 media_image4.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Weiss et al. teach a structure comprising: a first body member 207a including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component 230A at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 207b including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 225B at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. As for claim 4, Weiss et al. teach that the first body member 207a is of a unibody construction that is a first half of the structure, and wherein the second body member 207b is of a unibody construction that is a second half of the structure. As for claim 5, Weiss et al. teach that the second body member 207a is identical to the first body member 207b. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gansow et al. (U.S. Patent No. 11,882,939 B2). PNG media_image5.png 213 311 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 214 264 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 222 302 media_image7.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Gansow et al. teach a structure comprising: a first body member 24 including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component 26,28 at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 24 including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 26,28 at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. As for claim 3, Gansow et al. teach that the receiving cavity 26,28 of the first interlocking component receives the engaging portion of the wall of the second interlocking component, and wherein the receiving cavity 26,28 of the second interlocking component receives the engaging portion of the wall of the first interlocking component. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hrib (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0207442 A1). PNG media_image8.png 218 219 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 241 213 media_image9.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Hrib teaches a structure comprising: a first body member 10 including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component 12 at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 10 including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 14 at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Croom (U.S. Patent No. 5,509,720 A). PNG media_image10.png 148 243 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 155 200 media_image11.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Croom teaches a structure comprising: a first body member 12 including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component 22 at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 14, 16,18 including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 24 at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakamura (U.S. Patent No. 3,944,282). PNG media_image12.png 233 332 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 159 224 media_image13.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Nakamura teaches a structure comprising: a first body member 6 including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component 7 at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 6’ including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 8 at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. As for claim 3, Gansow et al. teach that the receiving cavity 26,28 of the first interlocking component receives the engaging portion of the wall of the second interlocking component, and wherein the receiving cavity 26,28 of the second interlocking component receives the engaging portion of the wall of the first interlocking component. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lohmeyer (U.S. Patent No. 3,669,494). PNG media_image14.png 200 188 media_image14.png Greyscale As for claim 1, Lohmeyer teaches a structure comprising: a first body member 1 including a first interfacing side edge and a first interconnecting component 4 at the first interfacing side edge; and a second body member 1 including a second interfacing side edge and a second interconnecting component 5 at the second interfacing side edge; wherein the first interconnecting component engages with the second interconnecting component to secure the first body member and the second body member together. As for claim 3, Lohmeyer teaches that the receiving cavity 5 of the first interlocking component receives the engaging portion 4 of the wall of the second interlocking component, and wherein the receiving cavity 5 of the second interlocking component receives the engaging 4 portion of the wall of the first interlocking component. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KEKLEN et al. (U.S. Patent No. 2,572,732). KEKLEN et al. teaches the structure substantially a s claimed but does not teach that the securing members comprise a threaded bolt and wing nut. However, the bolts 48,66 disclosed by KEKLEN et al. is nothing more than an alternative conventional method of coupling the first and second body members to each other. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure because it teaches structures and concepts similar to those of the present invention . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rodney B. White whose telephone number is (571)272-6863. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David R. Dunn can be reached on (571) 272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Rodney B White/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594862
BABY CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593917
FOLDING RECLINER WITH GUIDE MECHANISMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588769
CONVERTIBLE INFANT CHAIR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588763
SEATING FURNITURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589683
SEAT PAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.7%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2169 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month