Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/817,068

Three Dimensional (3D) Modeling of a Complex Control Object

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Priority
Jun 05, 2014 — provisional 62/008,438 +6 more
Examiner
JIA, XIN
Art Unit
2663
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sim Ip Hxr LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
528 granted / 624 resolved
+22.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
76.8%
+36.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 624 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12086322, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10579156, and claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10983597. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12086322, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10579156, and claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10983597 disclose every limitation of claims 1- 20 in the instant application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIN JIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5536. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am-7:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gregory Morse can be reached at (571)272-3838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIN JIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770262
METHODS FOR TRAINING AT LEAST A PREDICTION MODEL, OR FOR PROCESSING AT LEAST A PRE-CONTRAST IMAGE DEPICTING A BODY PART PRIOR TO AN INJECTION OF CONTRAST AGENT USING SAID PREDICTION MODEL
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770156
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTHENTICATING A VISUAL ITEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762653
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IMAGE PROCESSING
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755524
METHOD OF TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR DETECTING TARGET OBJECT IN INFRARED IMAGE, METHOD EXECUTED BY PROCESSOR THEREFOR, ONBOARD VEHICLE COMPUTER UNIT THEREFOR, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM COMPRISING PROGRAM CODES THEREFOR, VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749149
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ENHANCING DEFINITION OF IMAGE GROUP USING MACHINE LEARNING, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 624 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month