Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/817,529

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — JP 2022-032836 +1 more
Examiner
DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Alps Alpine Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
796 granted / 1341 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1379
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1341 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 5 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP H11194724 to Ozaki et al. (hereinafter “Ozaki”). Regarding claim 1, Ozaki teaches a display board comprising: a first decorative layer (light- non-transmissive layer/ light opaque layer 4) representing a decorative pattern; a light transmitting region (opening 6) provided in the first decorative layer (4), the light transmitting region (6) being configured to transmit light; a scattering layer (transparent dial 1) disposed below the first decorative layer (4), the scattering layer (1) being configured to scatter the light; a light source (warning lamp (not shown)) disposed at a side of the scattering layer (1), the light source being configured to emit light toward the scattering layer (1); and a second decorative layer (warning display layer 2) disposed below the scattering layer (1) and at a position overlapping the light transmitting region (6), the second decorative layer (2) representing the decorative pattern. PNG media_image1.png 142 280 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Ozaki teaches a pattern of the decorative pattern of the second decorative layer (2) is larger than a pattern of the decorative pattern of the first decorative layer (6). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, Ozaki does not teaches a display device comprising in combination with all the other claimed limitations the scattering layer formed of a transparent material, the transparent material containing scattering fine particles with light scattering properties. Regarding claim 3, Ozaki does not teaches a display device comprising in combination with all the other claimed limitations the second decorative layer having the decorative pattern having a brightness different from that of the first decorative layer. Regarding claim 4, Ozaki teaches the light- non-transmissive layer/ light opaque layer 4 has black pigment. Ozaki does not teach a display device comprising in combination with all the other claimed limitations both the first decorative layer and the second decorative layer represent a black-based decorative pattern. Regarding claim 6, Ozaki does not teaches a display device comprising in combination with all the other claimed limitations the scattering layer having a reflective finish for reflecting the light on a surface orthogonal to and/or a surface opposite to an incident surface of the light emitted from the light source. Regarding claim 7, Ozaki does not teaches the scattering layer having an absorption finish for absorbing the light on a surface orthogonal to and/or a surface opposite to the incident surface of the light emitted from the light source. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CASSANDRA DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-6642. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 AM-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at 571-272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CASSANDRA DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676085
Elastomeric Card Case Holder Device and Method
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658078
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648545
ANIMAL EAR TAG
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646426
ELECTRONIC ROTATING RIDER APPARATUS AND SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640063
Display device
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.9%)
2y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month