Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/817,892

CATHETER CONSTRUCTION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Priority
Aug 28, 2023 — provisional 63/579,163
Examiner
BRUTUS, JOEL F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Maduro Discovery LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
955 granted / 1312 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1350
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1312 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Martin (Pub. No.: US 2020/0391009) in view of Krolik et al (Pub. No.: US 2018/0015257). Regarding claims 1-2, 5, Martin discloses a catheter tubing comprising: a tubular structure extending along an axial length and having a passageway (lumen) [see 0016-0018, 0102-0103]; a tubular layer forming at least a portion of a wall of the tubular structure and comprising a plurality of material sections extending spirally along at least a portion of the axial length, where each material section is joined to an adjacent material section [see 0013-0025, 0041, 0084, 0102]; wherein the plurality of material sections include at least a first material section and a second material section, the first material section comprises a first structural property and the second material section comprises a second structural property, where the first structural property differs from the second structural property [see 0013-0025, 0083]; at least one lumen extending within at least one of the plurality of material sections [see 0017-0018, 0026]. Martin doesn’t disclose where the at least one lumen permits fluid flow therethrough. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose at least one lumen permits fluid flow therethrough and at least one opening in the tubular layer, where the at least one opening is fluidly coupled to the at least one lumen [see 0058, 0061, 0065] Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by using at least one lumen permits fluid flow therethrough and at least one opening in the tubular layer, where the at least one opening is fluidly coupled to the at least one lumen; to allow fluid to pass from the lumen within the tubular member 150, for example fluid from the inflation port 106, to a cavity or recess or balloon outside the tubular member 150 [see 0065]. Regarding claim 3, Martin doesn’t disclose a balloon having a balloon material over the at least one opening, where the balloon material is affixed to the tubular layer such that pressurization of the at least one lumen causes expansion of the balloon. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose a balloon (200, see 0071) having a balloon material over the at least one opening [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9] where the balloon material is affixed to the tubular layer such that pressurization of the at least one lumen causes expansion of the balloon [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9] Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by using a balloon having a balloon material over the at least one opening, where the balloon material is affixed to the tubular layer such that pressurization of the at least one lumen causes expansion of the balloon; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 4, Martin doesn’t disclose a balloon material extending along the tubular layer having an interior surface at least partially joined to an exterior of the tubular layer wherein such that when pressurized by the at least one opening in the tubular layer, the balloon material expands away from the exterior of the tubular layer to assume a balloon shape on the tubular structure Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose a balloon material extending along the tubular layer having an interior surface at least partially joined to an exterior of the tubular layer [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9] wherein such that when pressurized by the at least one opening in the tubular layer, the balloon material expands away from the exterior of the tubular layer to assume a balloon shape on the tubular structure [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9] Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by using a balloon material extending along the tubular layer having an interior surface at least partially joined to an exterior of the tubular layer wherein such that when pressurized by the at least one opening in the tubular layer, the balloon material expands away from the exterior of the tubular layer to assume a balloon shape on the tubular structure; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 6, Martin discloses wherein at least one of the plurality of tubular extensions includes a reinforcement structure (support structure) [see 0079, 0096]. Regarding claim 7, Martin doesn’t disclose wherein the plurality of material sections comprises a first material section comprising an expandable material and where the at least one lumen comprises a first lumen within the first material section, wherein pressurization of the first lumen causes the first material section to expand radially outward from the tubular layer to forms a spiral structure extending along at least a portion of the axial length of the tubular layer. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose wherein the plurality of material sections comprises a first material section comprising an expandable material and where the at least one lumen comprises a first lumen within the first material section [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9]; wherein pressurization of the first lumen causes the first material section to expand radially outward from the tubular layer to forms a spiral structure extending along at least a portion of the axial length of the tubular layer [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9]. Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by an expandable material and where the at least one lumen comprises a first lumen within the first material section, wherein pressurization of the first lumen causes the first material section to expand radially outward from the tubular layer to forms a spiral structure extending along at least a portion of the axial length of the tubular layer; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 8, Martin discloses a support structure within or exterior a passageway [see 0096, figs 5-9. 21-24] Regarding claim 9, Martin discloses a liner interior to or embedded with the support structure [figs 5-9. 21-24] Regarding claim 10, Martin discloses medical tubing comprising: an elongate body extending along an axial length [see 0013-0025]; a plurality of material sections extending spirally along at least a first portion of the axial length to form at least a portion of a wall of the elongate body, the plurality of material sections including a first material section [see 0013-0025]; Martin doesn’t disclose the first material section includes a first functional lumen extending therein, such that pressurization of the first functional lumen causes the first material section to expand radially outward from the plurality of material sections to form an expanded spiral shape on the elongate body. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose the first material section includes a first functional lumen extending therein, such that pressurization of the first functional lumen causes the first material section to expand radially outward from the plurality of material sections to form an expanded spiral shape on the elongate body [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9]. Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by having the first material section includes a first functional lumen extending therein, such that pressurization of the first functional lumen causes the first material section to expand radially outward from the plurality of material sections to form an expanded spiral shape on the elongate body; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 11, Martin discloses wherein the plurality of material sections comprises at least a second material section extending spirally over at least a second portion of the axial length [see 0015-0025]. Regarding claims 12-16, Martin doesn’t disclose where the second material section includes a second functional lumen in fluid communication with at least one opening in a surface of the elongate body; a balloon material covering the at least one opening. wherein the expanded spiral shape comprises a plurality of turns having a spacing. wherein the spacing of the plurality of turns prevents fluid flow between the plurality of turns, such that the expanded spiral shape comprises an occlusion region when expanded. wherein the spacing of the plurality of turns permits permit fluid flow between the plurality of turns. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose where the second material section includes a second functional lumen in fluid communication with at least one opening in a surface of the elongate body; a balloon material covering the at least one opening. wherein the expanded spiral shape comprises a plurality of turns having a spacing. wherein the spacing of the plurality of turns prevents fluid flow between the plurality of turns, such that the expanded spiral shape comprises an occlusion region when expanded. wherein the spacing of the plurality of turns permits permit fluid flow between the plurality of turns [see claim 79, 0070-0074, figs 5-9, 22-24]. Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by using a second functional lumen in fluid communication with at least one opening in a surface of the elongate body; a balloon material covering the at least one opening. wherein the expanded spiral shape comprises a plurality of turns having a spacing. wherein the spacing of the plurality of turns prevents fluid flow between the plurality of turns, such that the expanded spiral shape comprises an occlusion region when expanded. wherein the spacing of the plurality of turns permits permit fluid flow between the plurality of turns; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 17, Martin discloses where the plurality of material sections comprises a tubular member having a spiral region removed to accommodate the first material section [see 0015-0025]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 18-22, 25-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Martin (Pub. No.: US 2020/0391009) Regarding claim 18, Martin discloses catheter tubing comprising: a tubular structure extending along an axial length and having a passageway [see 0015-0025]; a composite layer forming at least a portion of a wall of the tubular structure and comprising a plurality of tubing extensions extending spirally along at least a portion of the axial length [see 0015-0025]., where at least one of the plurality of tubing extensions includes a lumen extending therein [see 0017-0018, 0026]. Regarding claim 19, Martin discloses wherein at least a first tubing extension from the plurality of tubing extensions changes structural properties over a length of the first tubing extension [see 0015-0025]. Regarding claim 20, Martin discloses wherein a structural property of at least two of the plurality of tubing extensions is different [see 0015-0025]. Regarding claim 21, Martin discloses wherein the plurality of tubing extensions includes a solid tubular extension [see 0092]. Regarding claim 22, Martin discloses wherein the plurality of tubing extensions includes a tubing extension having one or more openings in an exterior surface of the composite layer [see figs 22-24]. Regarding claim 25, Martin discloses a support structure interior to or embedded within the plurality of tubing extensions [see 0096, figs 5-9. 21-24] Regarding claim 26, Martin discloses a liner interior to or embedded with the support structure [figs 5-9. 21-24] Claim(s) 23-24, 27-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Martin (Pub. No.: US 2020/0391009) in view of Krolik et al (Pub. No.: US 2018/0015257). Regarding claims 23-24, Martin doesn’t disclose a balloon material exterior to the one or more openings, such that pressurization through the one or more openings causes the balloon material to expand radially outward from the tubular structure. wherein the plurality of tubing extensions includes an expandable tubing extension with a functional lumen such that pressurization of the functional lumen causes the expandable tubing extension to expand radially away from the composite layer to form an expanded spiral shape about an exterior of the tubular structure. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose a balloon material exterior to the one or more openings, such that pressurization through the one or more openings causes the balloon material to expand radially outward from the tubular structure. wherein the plurality of tubing extensions includes an expandable tubing extension with a functional lumen such that pressurization of the functional lumen causes the expandable tubing extension to expand radially away from the composite layer to form an expanded spiral shape about an exterior of the tubular structure [see 0070-0074, figs 5-9] Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by using a balloon material exterior to the one or more openings, such that pressurization through the one or more openings causes the balloon material to expand radially outward from the tubular structure. wherein the plurality of tubing extensions includes an expandable tubing extension with a functional lumen such that pressurization of the functional lumen causes the expandable tubing extension to expand radially away from the composite layer to form an expanded spiral shape about an exterior of the tubular structure; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 27, Martin discloses a catheter tubing comprising: a tubular structure having a wall and a passageway extending in the tubular structure [see 0015-0025]; a material section extending spirally in a portion of the wall over a first axial length, where the material section comprises a functional lumen extending therein along the first axial length [see 0017-0026]. Martin doesn’t disclose where the functional lumen is fluidly isolated from the passageway such that the functional lumen can be pressurized independently from the passageway. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose the functional lumen is fluidly isolated from the passageway such that the functional lumen can be pressurized independently from the passageway [see 0071-0074, 0086] Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al by functional lumen is fluidly isolated from the passageway such that the functional lumen can be pressurized independently from the passageway; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 28, Martin discloses wherein the material section comprises a first structural characteristic that is different from an axially adjacent material in the portion of the wall [see 0015-0025]. Regarding claim 29, Martin discloses where the functional lumen terminates in at least one opening at a surface of the tubular structure [see 0026]. Regarding claims 30-31, Martin doesn’t disclose an expandable material at an exterior of the tubular structure and fluidly coupled to the at least one opening, such that pressurization of the functional lumen causes the expandable material to radially expand away from a surface of the tubular structure. wherein the material section is configured to expand outwardly from the tubular structure upon pressurization of the functional lumen such that the material section forms an expanded spiral shape over an exterior of the tubular structure. Nonetheless, Krolik et al disclose an expandable material at an exterior of the tubular structure and fluidly coupled to the at least one opening, such that pressurization of the functional lumen causes the expandable material to radially expand away from a surface of the tubular structure. wherein the material section is configured to expand outwardly from the tubular structure upon pressurization of the functional lumen such that the material section forms an expanded spiral shape over an exterior of the tubular structure [see 0070-0074] Therefore, it is obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed and would have been motivated to combine Martin and Krolik et al byan expandable material at an exterior of the tubular structure and fluidly coupled to the at least one opening, such that pressurization of the functional lumen causes the expandable material to radially expand away from a surface of the tubular structure. wherein the material section is configured to expand outwardly from the tubular structure upon pressurization of the functional lumen such that the material section forms an expanded spiral shape over an exterior of the tubular structure; to expand or stretch to a selected or preferred diameter and maintain that diameter even with possible expected higher pressures [see 0071]. Regarding claim 32, Martin discloses wherein a material property of the material section changes over a portion of the first axial length [see 0015-0025] Regarding claim 33, Martin discloses wherein the wall of the tubular structure further includes a plurality of additional material sections extending spirally in the portion of the wall [see 0015-0025]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOEL F BRUTUS whose telephone number is (571)270-3847. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Sat, 11:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne Kozak can be reached at 571-270-0552. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOEL F BRUTUS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745965
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745975
IN VIVO FLUID FLOW SENSOR
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740719
TECHNIQUES FOR HEART RATE DETECTION
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733834
Methods, Apparatuses And Electronic Devices For Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733901
Artificial Intelligence System for Comprehensive Medical Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Optimization through Medical Imaging
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+17.7%)
3y 5m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month