Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 23, 2026
Application No. 18/817,988

GENERATING AND USING TOKENS TO REQUEST SERVICES AND ACCESS TO A PRODUCT COLLABORATION PLATFORM

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2021 — continuation of 12/118,598
Examiner
LOHARIKAR, ANAND R
Art Unit
3689
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zazzle Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
262 granted / 376 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 376 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims Status Claims 1 and 11 have been amended. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and rejected. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/15/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Response to Arguments Double Patenting Rejection Applicant’s terminal disclaimer filed on 4/1/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of the US Patent numbers or US Application Numbers listed therein has been reviewed but was not accepted. Applicant is requested to resubmit the terminal disclaimer with the correct reference application filing date (as instructed in the response to the terminal disclaimer). The rejection has been restated below, for completeness of record. 35 USC 101 Rejection Applicant's arguments, filed 4/1/2026, with respect to the previous rejection of claims 1-20 under 35 USC 101 have been fully considered and are persuasive, in view of the accompanying amendments. Additionally, in view of MPEP 2106.07(b) which states that “a claim is eligible because the claim as a whole integrates the judicial exception into a practical application or amounts to significantly more than the judicial exception when the additional elements are considered both individually and in combination… [and] the additional element may be enough to integrate the judicial exception into a practical application or to qualify as "significantly more" if it meaningfully limits the judicial exception, e.g., it improves another technology or technical field, improves the functioning of a computer itself.” As is the situation in this case, additional elements have been reevaluated and are considered “significantly more” as they meaningfully limit the judicial exception and are therefore eligible. Accordingly, the previous rejection under 35 USC 101 has been withdrawn. Double Patenting Non-Statutory Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-18 of US Patent No. 12,118,598 (Application No. 17/217,870). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application are anticipated by the patented claims. Specifically, the instant claims are anticipated by the patented claims of 12,118,598, as follows: Instant claims 12,118,598 Patent (Claim 1) 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, by a service computer, a request, from a user computer, for a service with regard to a product; receiving, by a service computer, a request, from a user computer, for a service with regard to a product; wherein the request comprises information obtained by scanning, by the user computer, a token shown on the product; wherein the request comprises information obtained by scanning, by the user computer, a token shown on the product; translating the token to a hyperlink in a standard format that a plurality of service computers understands; translating the token to a hyperlink in a standard format that a plurality of service computers understands; wherein the token is generated based on, at least in part, a digital token that is created during a process of generating a digital design of a product and that indicates a location, at a data storage system, at which a plurality of key-value pairs for the digital design is stored; wherein the token is generated based on, at least in part, a digital token that is created during a process of generating a digital design of the product and that indicates a location, at a data storage system, at which a plurality of key-value pairs for the digital design is stored; wherein the token is a reference to a product description of the product, and is used in a process of manufacturing the product; wherein the token is embedded into product description data associated with the digital design; in response to receiving a request for the product corresponding to the digital design, transmitting the product description data with the token embedded in the product description data to a manufacturing entity to cause the manufacturing entity to: extract the digital token from the product description data, use the digital token to retrieve the plurality of key-value pairs from the location, use the plurality of key-value pairs to generate manufacturing instructions for manufacturing the product corresponding to the digital design, generate the token, and affix the token to the product. storing the hyperlink in the standard format; storing the hyperlink in the standard format; causing, by the service computer, displaying, on the user computer, a graphical user interface allowing selecting any of one or more customization options; causing the user computer to perform: determine whether the hyperlink indicates a domain name, in response to determining that the hyperlink indicates a domain name: display, on the user computer, a first graphical representation of a first website associated with the domain name, establish a first communications connection between the user computer and the first website, display, on the user computer, a first graphical user interface generated based on first data received from the first website and via the first communications connection, and allowing a user to select the service, receive a service selection via the first graphical user interface; transmit the service selection and the indication of the product from the user computer to the service computer; in response to receiving, from the user computer, input for at least one of the one or more customization options for the service: in response to receiving, by the service computer, the service selection for the service: determining one or more customization options for the service; causing, by the service computer, displaying, on the user computer, a graphical user interface allowing selecting any of the one or more customization options; automatically generating adjusted input by adjusting the input for the at least one of the one or more customization options based on one or more manufacturing constraints; in response to receiving, from the user computer, input for at least one of the one or more customization options for the service: automatically generating adjusted input by adjusting the input for the at least one of the one or more customization options based on one or more manufacturing constraints; transmitting, in real time, the adjusted input and the hyperlink associated with the service to either a first website or a second website to perform the service for the at least one of the one or more customization options; and transmitting, in real time, the adjusted input and the hyperlink associated with the service to either the first website or the second website to perform the service for the at least one of the one or more customization options; and providing, by the service computer, the service performed by either the first website or the second website according to the adjusted input provided for the at least one of the one or more customization options. providing, by the service computer, the service performed by either the first website or the second website according to the adjusted input provided for the at least one of the one or more customization options; Dependent claims 2-10 are anticipated by ‘598 as follows: Instant claims 12,118,598 Patent Claims Claim 2 Claim 2, 1 Claim 3 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 1 Claim 7 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 7 Claim 9 Claim 8 Claim 10 Claim 9 With regards to claims 11-20, all the limitations in computer-readable storage media claims 11-20 are closely parallel to the limitations of method claims 1-10 analyzed above and are rejected on the same bases. These claims fully anticipate the independent claims of the instant application. See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998). Moreover, the scope of the above noted claims in the instant application, if patented, would extend the grant/monopoly and are thereby properly rejected. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANAND LOHARIKAR whose telephone number is 571-272-8756. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marissa Thein can be reached at 571-272-6764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANAND LOHARIKAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675810
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERSONALIZED SIZING CODES
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670520
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR GRANULAR DIGITAL IDENTITY SELECTION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657621
PIVOT GROUP GENERATION FOR SEARCH AND RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646103
ORDER MANAGEMENT METHODS, SYSTEM, TERMINAL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE BASED ON MULTI-PERSON ORDERING
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12632890
RECOMMENDING FASHION ITEM FIT STYLE USING LANDMARKS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+25.8%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 376 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month