Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/818,081

EQUIPMENT FRONT END MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Priority
Oct 23, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0138086 +3 more
Examiner
MYERS, GLENN F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bum Je Woo
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
802 granted / 1031 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1037
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1031 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suzuki et al. 2019/0326134 and in view Sung et al. 2008/0304944. In Re Claim 1, Suzuki et al. teach an equipment front end module (EFEM), comprising: a transfer chamber (3) in which wafers (W) are transferred between a wafer storage device (2) and process equipment (MS); a first opening (21a) allowing connection of a FOUP (4) of the wafer storage device to the transfer chamber; a first door (22) provided in the transfer chamber so as to open and close an inside of the first opening; Suzuki et al. do not teach a first chamber surrounding the transfer chamber at a position outside the transfer chamber. However, Sung et al. teach a first chamber (36) surrounding the transfer chamber (14) at a position outside the transfer chamber. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the application was filed to add a first chamber to the EFEM of Suzuki et al. as taught by Sung et al. with a reasonable expectation for success in order to reduce exposure of wafers to detrimental substances. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hong et al. teach a EFEM comprising a transfer chamber, first opening and first door. Reimer et al. teach a first chamber surrounding a transfer chamber. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GLENN F MYERS whose telephone number is (571)270-1160. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at 571-272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GLENN F. MYERS Examiner Art Unit 3652 /GLENN F MYERS/Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747145
EQUIPMENT PLATFORM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748423
ASSET DELIVERY SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741833
TUGGER DOCKING PLATE FOR ONE TOUCH DELIVERY
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740361
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735251
REFUSE COLLECTION DRONE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 10m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1031 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month