Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/818,807

Access Station For Picking Storage Containers

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Oct 12, 2018 — NO 20181318 +2 more
Examiner
RANDAZZO, THOMAS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
AutoStore Technology A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
813 granted / 938 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
942
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
69.4%
+29.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 938 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-20 are currently being examined. Specification The Specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. MPEP § 608.01 Nonstatutory Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over Claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent No. 12,098,029. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the '029 patent discloses the following with respect to the Applicant’s claims: 1. An access station for picking storage containers, comprising: (See Claim 1) a picking zone; (See Claim 1) at least one conveyor arranged to transport one or more storage containers from an entry position through said picking zone and to an exit position; (See Claim 1) at least one tilting device arranged to tilt a storage container at least in the picking zone; and (See Claim 1) paneling comprising an aperture with a sliding door in the picking zone. (See Claim 1) 2. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the paneling comprises a tilted top panel. (See Claim 1) 3. The access station according to claim 2, wherein the aperture with the sliding door is disposed in the tilted top panel. (See Claim 1) 4. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the paneling comprises a tilted front panel. (See Claim 1) 5. The access station according to claim 1, where the entry position and the exit position are arranged for connection to at least one storage system conveyor. (See Claim 2) 6. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the access station comprises only one tilting device arranged to tilt at least one storage container in the picking zone. (See Claim 3) 7. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the picking zone is arranged to receive only one storage container. (See Claim 4) 8. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the at least one tilting device is arranged to tilt only one storage container. (See Claim 5) 9. The access station according to claim 1, comprising three tilting devices. (See Claim 6) 10. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the access station comprises an entry conveyor arranged to transport the one or more storage containers from the entry position to at least one access conveyor, and (See Claim 7) an exit conveyor arranged to transport the one or more storage containers from the at least one access conveyor to the exit position. (See Claim 7) 11. The access station according to claim 10, wherein a transport direction of the entry conveyor is parallel and opposite to a transport direction of the exit conveyor, and (See Claim 8) wherein a transport direction of the at least one access conveyor is orthogonal to the transport directions of the entry and exit conveyors. (See Claim 8) 12. The access station according to claim 11, wherein the at least one tilting device is arranged to tilt around an axis parallel to a transport direction of the at least one access conveyor. (See Claim 9) 13. The access station according to claim 1, wherein the picking zone is arranged towards a front side of the access station, and (See Claim 10) where the access station is arranged to receive a goods conveyor between the picking zone and a back side of the access station. (See Claim 10) 14. A method for operating an access station for picking storage containers, the access station comprising: (See Claims 1 and 11) a picking zone; (See Claim 1) at least one conveyor arranged to transport one or more storage containers from an entry position through said picking zone and to an exit position; (See Claim 1) at least one tilting device arranged to tilt a storage container at least in the picking zone; and (See Claim 1) paneling comprising an aperture with a sliding door in the picking zone, (See Claim 1) wherein the method comprises the steps of: (See Claim 11) receiving the storage container at the entry position; (See Claim 11) transferring the storage container from the entry position to the picking zone; (See Claim 11) tilting the storage container with the at least one tilting device; (See Claim 11) transferring the storage container from the picking zone to the exit position; and (See Claim 11) delivering the storage container at the exit position. (See Claim 11) 15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the paneling comprises a tilted top panel. (See Claim 1) 16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the aperture with the sliding door is disposed in the tilted top panel. (See Claim 1) 17. The method according to claim 14, wherein the paneling comprises a tilted front panel. (See Claim 1) 18. An automated storage and retrieval system, the automated storage and retrieval system comprising: (See Claim 12) a rail system comprising a first set of parallel tracks arranged in a horizontal plane and extending in a first direction, and (See Claim 12) a second set of parallel tracks arranged in the horizontal plane and extending in a second direction which is orthogonal to the first direction, (See Claim 12) which first and second sets of tracks form a grid pattern in the horizontal plane comprising a plurality of adjacent grid cells, (See Claim 12) each comprising a grid opening defined by a pair of neighboring tracks of the first set of tracks and a pair of neighboring tracks of the second set of tracks; (See Claim 12) a plurality of stacks of storage containers arranged in storage columns located beneath the rail system, (See Claim 12) wherein each storage column is located vertically below a grid opening; (See Claim 12) a plurality of container handling vehicles for handling the storage containers in the automated storage and retrieval system, (See Claim 12) each vehicle being configured to move on the rail system above the storage columns, (See Claim 12) each vehicle comprising: (See Claim 12) a vehicle body; and (See Claim 12) a wheel assembly connected to the vehicle body, (See Claim 12) the wheel assembly being configured to guide each container handling vehicle along the rail system in at least one of the first direction and the second direction; (See Claim 12) an access station comprising: (See Claim 12) a picking zone; (See Claim 12) at least one storage conveyor arranged to transport one or more of the storage containers from an entry position through said picking zone and to an exit position; (See Claim 12) at least one tilting device arranged to tilt a storage container at least in the picking zone and (See Claim 12) paneling comprising an aperture with a sliding door in the picking zone; and (See Claim 12) at least one storage system conveyor arranged below at least one delivery column, (See Claim 12) wherein the at least one storage system conveyor is arranged to transfer the one or more storage containers between a transfer position below the at least one delivery column and the entry position of the access station, and (See Claim 12) between the transfer position and the exit position of the access station. (See Claim 12) 19. The automated storage and retrieval system according to claim 18, wherein the paneling comprises a tilted top panel, and (See Claim 12) wherein the aperture with the sliding door is disposed in the tilted top panel. (See Claim 12) 20. The automated storage and retrieval system according to claim 18, wherein the paneling comprises a tilted front panel. (See Claim 12) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure because the prior art references contain subject matter that relates to one or more of Applicant’s claim limitations. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS RANDAZZO whose telephone number is (313)446-4903. The examiner can normally be reached between 9:00am and 4:00pm ET Monday through Thursday and between 9:00am and 11:00am ET on Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jacob Scott, can be reached on 571-270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from the Patent Center. Unpublished application information in the Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in the Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about the Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS RANDAZZO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655 June 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679654
MATERIAL CONVEYING METHOD, SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679650
STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668423
THREE-DIMENSIONAL UNLOADING SYSTEM CAPABLE OF UNLOADING GOODS INTO CONTAINER AND CONTROL METHOD OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL UNLOADING SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668422
SORTATION OF ITEMS USING AN IMAGE FINGERPRINT TO RIGHT THE ITEMS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654950
METHOD FOR ANALYZING MALFUNCTIONS IN AN OPERATION OF A HANDLING SYSTEM, METHOD FOR TRAINING OR RETRAINING A CLASSIFIER, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING MALFUNCTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 938 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month