Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/818,910

Integrated Camera and Ultra-Wideband Location Devices and Related Systems

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2020 — provisional 63/001,695 +1 more
Examiner
CESE, KENNY A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wiser Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
536 granted / 712 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
748
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) filed on 9/27/2024 was considered and placed on the file of record by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The following highlighted claim elements are vague and indefinite: “wherein the at one location device comprises a UWB location device, a combination UWB/camera location device and/or a camera location device.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bruemmer et al. (US 2017/0023659). Regarding claim 1, Bruemmer teaches a real time location system, the system comprising: one or more ultra-wideband (UWB) sensors positioned in an environment (see para. 0016, Bruemmer discusses a UWB location device and a camera location device); one or more image capture sensors positioned in the environment (see para. 0016, Bruemmer discusses a UWB location device and a camera location device); wherein the one or more UWB sensors and the one or more image capture sensors are integrated into at least one location device (see figure 3, para. 0016, Bruemmer discusses a UWB location device and a camera location device); wherein the at one location device comprises a UWB location device, a combination UWB/camera location device and/or a camera location device (see para. 0016, Bruemmer discusses a UWB location device and a camera location device); and at least one UWB tag associated with an object in the environment to provide a tagged item in the environment and wherein a location of the tagged item is tracked using the at least one location device (see para. 0016, 0062, DeAngelis discusses UWB RFID system is to retrieve state and positional information (ID) generated by each tag (also known as a transponder). Tags are usually affixed to objects so that it becomes possible to locate where the goods). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Han et al. (US 2016/0334800) discusses the sensor unit may include a dust sensor, an odor sensor, a laser sensor, an ultra-wideband (UWB) sensor, and an image sensor. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNY A CESE whose telephone number is (571) 270-1896. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday, 9am – 4pm. If attempts to reach the primary examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gregory Morse can be reached on (571) 272-3838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kenny A Cese/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743789
METHOD FOR TRACKING OBJECT AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS SUPPORTING THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731367
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PEDESTRIAN BODY PART FEATURE EXTRACTION AND TERMINAL DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725310
METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF BIOPSY SAMPLE IMAGES
5y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718389
IMAGE-BASED DETECTION USING DISTANCE DATA
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12700106
REAL-MOTION PREDICTION
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 10m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month