Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/818,965

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR JOBSITE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Examiner
LAZARO, DAVID R
Art Unit
2455
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BLACK & DECKER, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
660 granted / 759 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/14/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 11,879,987 by Davis et al. (Davis) in view of US 2021/0290102 by Burwinkel et al. (Burwinkel). With respect to claim 1, Davis teaches a method for job site communications management, comprising: receiving, via a first wireless device, at least one advertising signal, wherein the first wireless headset comprises a low-energy communication transceiver, a speaker, and a microphone; (Col. 5 line 57 – Col. 6 line 13, Col. 6 lines 27-46, Col. 8 lines 20-42, Col. 11 lines 20-Col. 7 line 13 – an advertising beacon signals from a beacon of a power tool is received by a personal wireless device such as a smartphone, advertising may be, for example, Bluetooth low energy (BLE)) determining, via the first wireless device, if the at least one advertising signal denotes at least one approved worksite powered device comprising at least one of a power tool, a power tool battery pack, a battery charger, or a work light; ((Col. 5 line 57 – Col. 6 line 13, Col. 8 lines 20-42, Col. 11 lines 20-Col. 7 line 13 advertising signal includes identifying information of the device, the examiner interprets a connection phase of BLE compatible devices as showing the devices are “approved”). initiating, via the first wireless device, communication with the at least one approved worksite powered device if the at least one advertising signal denotes an approved device; (Col. 8 lines 20-42, Col. 11 lines 20-Col. 7 line 13, Col. 13 lines 4-41 – wireless device may connect and communicate based on the advertised signal and receive location and additional information) - the worksite powered device may output an audible alert (Col. 5 lines 45-56 – beacon of a device may have user output such as an audible alert) Davis does not teach the wireless devices is a headset and further receiving, via the first wireless headset, audio data from the at least one approved worksite powered device; and outputting, via the first wireless headset, audio data received from the at least one approved worksite powered device. Burwinkle teaches a wireless headset using BLE technology can act as a wireless device to receive alerts in relation to operation of a powered tool (Paragraphs 3, 34, 38-40, 76, 160, 162, 172 - audible alert may be provided to an ear-worn device such as a headset in relation to operation of power tools or heavy equipment ) It would have been obvious to one or ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the wireless device of Davis include a headset that receives the corresponding alerts of a powered device as in Burwinkle. One would be motivated to have this as ear-worn devices are common in environments using worksite powered devices and it is beneficial to be able to safely alert users of these devices. With respect to claim 2, Davis as modified teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, via the first wireless headset, local audio data; and transmitting, via the first wireless headset, the local audio data to the at least one approved worksite powered device. (Burwinkle Paragraph 131 – user providing audible response) Claim 16 is similar in scope to claim 1 and is therefore rejected based on the same rationale. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID R LAZARO whose telephone number is (571)272-3986. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emmanuel Moise can be reached at 571-272-3865. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID R LAZARO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2455
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592906
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLOUD RESOLVING AND INTERNET PATH FINDING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592895
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592883
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING FLOW TABLE ENTRY IN FLOW TABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587312
HYBRID PRODUCT POLAR CODES-BASED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587481
ROUTER PACKET QUEUING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month