Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/819,265

METHOD FOR UPDATING AN APPLICATION OF AN AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Sep 13, 2023 — DE 10 2023 208 876.2
Examiner
ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
546 granted / 659 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 659 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-9 have been submitted for examination and are pending further prosecution by the United States Patent & Trademark Office. Allowable Subject Matter With respect to independent claim 1, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest, either solely or in combination, the limitations "modifying the bytecode representation of the application at least with regard to at least one input and/or output interface of the application, the at least one input and/or output interface enabling a communication to at least one other application and/or to at least one other automotive electronic control unit; and deploying the modified bytecode representation of the application on the automotive electronic control unit and/or on the at least one other automotive electronic control unit." when considered in combination with the other limitations of claim 1. With respect to independent claim 8, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest, either solely or in combination, the limitations "modify the bytecode representation of the application at least with regard to at least one input and/or output interface of the application, the at least one input and/or output interface enabling a communication to at least one other application and/or to at least one other automotive electronic control unit; and deploy the modified bytecode representation of the application on the automotive electronic control unit and/or on the at least one other automotive electronic control unit." when considered in combination with the other limitations of claim 8. With respect to independent claim 9, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest, either solely or in combination, the limitations "modifying the bytecode representation of the application at least with regard to at least one input and/or output interface of the application, the at least one input and/or output interface enabling a communication to at least one other application and/or to at least one other automotive electronic control unit; and deploying the modified bytecode representation of the application on the automotive electronic control unit and/or on the at least one other automotive electronic control unit." when considered in combination with the other limitations of claim 9. Note, however, that claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 USC § 112(b) as being indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "deploying the bytecode representation of the application on the automotive electronic control unit and/or on the at least one other automotive electronic control unit." It's unclear whether the deployed bytecode representation refers to the pre-modified bytecode representation or the modified bytecode representation. In the interest of compact prosecution, and for purposes of examination, the limitation will be interpreted as "deploying the modified bytecode representation of the application on the automotive electronic control unit and/or on the at least one other automotive electronic control unit." If this is the intended interpretation, Applicants should also replace all instances of "bytecode representation" with "modified bytecode representation" as appropriate in the dependent claims. Dependent claims 2-7 inherit the deficiency of claim 1 and, therefore, are also rejected. Claims 8 and 9 recite analogous limitations and, therefore, are also rejected. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. DE 102020111051 A1 discloses a method for executing a reloadable program on an electronic control (ECU) unit of a vehicle. In one embodiment, code in a high-level programming language is translated into an intermediate representation, such as WebAssembly bytecode. The WebAssembly bytecode is transmitted to a Trusted Computing Base (TCB) for validation. Upon passing validation, the WebAssembly bytecode is stored in a flash memory of the ECU for execution by an interpreter. WO 9819237 A1 discloses, in one embodiment, a microcontroller mounted in an electrical subsystem of an automobile, the microcontroller used for various purposes including controlling access to the automobile, paying tolls via wireless communication, or interfacing with a global positioning system (GPS). The microcontroller includes a memory storing an application in bytecode format and an interpreter for executing the application. During operation, specific bytecodes can be modified into generic bytecodes for compatibility with a particular virtual machine. The NPL paper "WebAssembly: Paving the Way Towards a Unified and Distributed Intra-Vehicle Computing-and Data-Acquisition-Platform?" discusses the potential of an efficient, scalable and unified distributed onboard computing-and data-acquisition-platform based on WebAssembly. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GEOFFREY R ST LEGER whose telephone number is (571)270-7720. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (IFP) ~9:00-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hyung S Sough can be reached at 571-272-6799. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GEOFFREY R ST LEGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2192
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705033
CONFIGURABLE INTEGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICE IN SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694360
MODELING ENGINE STRUCTURING BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING NOTATION MODELS INTO PROCESS TREES
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688051
Extracting Data from Heterogeneous Sources with Library Conflicts
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681719
LIVE KERNEL UPDATES UNDER MEMORY CONSTRAINTS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675275
UPDATING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD REQUIREMENTS IN A DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.7%)
2y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 659 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month