Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/819,354

BONDED OPTICAL DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Dec 17, 2019 — provisional 62/949,312 +2 more
Examiner
OWENS, DANELL L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Adeia Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
575 granted / 755 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
786
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.9%
+17.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 755 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) in view of Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800). Regarding claims 2, Templier discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103), wherein the first and second dielectric bonding surfaces are directly bonded without an intervening adhesive and the first and second plurality of contact pads are directly bonded and electrically connected to one another without an intervening adhesive (pg. 9 1st para.; the control circuit 250 by hybrid direct bonding, that is to say by direct metal-metal bonding of the connection pads 205 of the circuit 200 on the connection pads 255 of the circuit 250, and direct dielectric-dielectric bonding of the dielectric layer 203 of the circuit 200 on the dielectric layer 253 of the circuit 250). Templier fails to teach wherein the second pixel region outputs a second color light different than the first color light. Pan discloses the second pixel region outputs a second color light (red color LED 404b of fig. 4A) different than the first color light (blue color LED 404a of fig. 4A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify light emitting display device of Templier with the 3-color LED array of Pan in order to increase the color gamut of the display device. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199). Regarding claim 3, Templier as modified by Pan discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan fails to teach wherein each pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions comprises a light guide. Coleman discloses wherein each pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions comprises a light guide. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify light emitting display device of Templier and Pan with the light guide of Coleman in order to collect the light from each pixel and then splits it into multiple emission locations (Coleman; para. 0053). Claim(s) 4 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800) and Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Su et al. (CN 110838500A). Regarding claim 4, Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman fails to teach further comprising at least one optical isolation structure to limit crosstalk between adjacent pixel regions of the plurality of pixel regions. Su discloses a micro-light-emitting diode display device further comprising at least one optical isolation structure (light shading structure 201a of fig. 4B) to limit crosstalk between adjacent pixel regions of the plurality of pixel regions (pg. 7 1st para.; preventing side leakage light). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the light emitting display device of Templier, Pan and Coleman with the light shading structure of Su in order to prevent side leakage light (Su; pg. 7 1st para.). Regarding claim 8, Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman fails to teach further comprising at least one optical isolation structure disposed between individual pixels of the plurality of pixels, wherein the at least one optical isolation structure is at least coextensive with a thickness of a pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions. Su discloses a micro-light-emitting diode display device further comprising at least one optical isolation structure (201a and 202a of fig. 4B) disposed between individual pixels of the plurality of pixels, wherein the at least one optical isolation structure is at least coextensive with a thickness of a pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions (illustrated in fig. 4B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the light emitting display device of Templier, Pan and Coleman with the light shading structure of Su in order to prevent side leakage light (Su; pg. 7 1st para.). Claim(s) 5 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800) and Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Balogh (CN 111684512 A). Regarding claims 5 and 6, Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman fails to teach further comprising a second plurality of optical emitters, wherein the first and second plurality of optical emitters are laterally offset from one another along a direction parallel to the first dielectric bonding surface. Balogh discloses LED display further comprising a second plurality of optical emitters, wherein the first and second plurality of optical emitters are laterally offset from one another along a direction parallel to the first dielectric bonding surface (pg. 6 5th para.; sub-pixel in the pixel region p, sub pixel can be arranged in more rows, row can be offset relative to each other). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the light emitting display device of Templier, Pan and Coleman with offset arrangement of Balogh in order to reach the highest optical density for optimum resolution (Balogh; pg. 6 3rd para.). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800 as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Pezeshki (US PG Pub. 20200411587). Regarding claim 7, Templier as modified by Pan discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan fails to teach further comprising a waveguide, wherein the first plurality of optical emitters is disposed between the at least one processor element and the waveguide. Pezeshki discloses further comprising a waveguide (para. 0049; optical waveguide layer has mirrors 425 of fig. 4), wherein the first plurality of optical emitters (LEDs 421 of fig. 4) is disposed between the at least one processor element (CPU/GPU chip 419) and the waveguide. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the display device of Templier and Pan with the waveguide of Pezeshki in order to provide devices that can form data connections that are potentially fast, low power, and low cost, at short distances (Pezeshki; para. 0014). Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800) and Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199) and Su et al. (CN 110838500A) as applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Tsutsumi (CN 102109136 A). Regarding claim 9, Templier as modified by Pan, Coleman and Su discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan, Coleman and Su fails to teach wherein the at least one optical isolation structure comprises a dielectric. Tsutsumi discloses a light emitting module wherein the at least one optical isolation structure (para. 0097; shading part 158b to 158d) comprises a dielectric (para. 0069; the light shielding material such as dielectric multilayer film). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify display device of Templier, Pan, Coleman and Su with the dielectric shielding material of Tsutsumi in order to achieve high reflectivity thereby increasing the illumination efficiency improving system performance. Claim(s) 10, 11, 14 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) in view of Su et al. (CN 110838500A). Regarding claims 10 and 16, a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier fails to teach further comprising at least one optical isolation structure disposed between individual pixels of the plurality of pixels, wherein the at least one optical isolation structure is at least coextensive with a thickness of a pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions. Su discloses a micro-light-emitting diode display device further comprising at least one optical isolation structure (201a and 202a of fig. 4B) disposed between individual pixels of the plurality of pixels, wherein the at least one optical isolation structure is at least coextensive with a thickness of a pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions (illustrated in fig. 4B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the light emitting display device of Templier with the light shading structure of Su in order to prevent side leakage light (Su; pg. 7 1st para.). Regarding claim 11, Templier discloses wherein the processor element is hybrid bonded to the first optical element (pg. 6 5th para.; the control circuit 150 by hybrid direct bonding). Regarding claim 12, Templier discloses a second optical element, wherein the second optical element comprises a plurality of second optical emitters (LED’s of fig. 2B) and a plurality of second pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein light emitted by the second optical emitters propagates through the plurality of second pixel regions. PNG media_image1.png 375 710 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, Templier discloses wherein the plurality of first optical emitters comprises a pitch, wherein the pitch is between approximately 1 micron and 10 microns (pg. 8 2nd para.; the inter-pixel pitch p2 of the device is between 2 and 30 μm, and the width of the elementary LEDs is between 0.5 and 25 μm). Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Su et al. (CN 110838500A) as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800). Regarding claim 13, Templier as modified by Su discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier fails to teach wherein the second pixel region outputs a second color light different than the first color light. Pan discloses the second pixel region outputs a second color light (red color LED 404b of fig. 4A) different than the first color light (blue color LED 404a of fig. 4A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify light emitting display device of Templier and Su with the 3-color LED array of Pan in order to increase the color gamut of the display device. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Su et al. (CN 110838500A) as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Tsutsumi (CN 102109136 A). Templier as modified by Su discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Su fails to teach wherein the at least one optical isolation structure comprises a dielectric. Tsutsumi discloses a light emitting module wherein the at least one optical isolation structure (para. 0097; shading part 158b to 158d) comprises a dielectric (para. 0069; the light shielding material such as dielectric multilayer film). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify display device of Templier and Su with the dielectric shielding material of Tsutsumi in order to achieve high reflectivity thereby increasing the illumination efficiency improving system performance. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199). Regarding claim 17, Templier as modified by Pan discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Pan fails to teach wherein each pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions comprises a light guide. Coleman discloses wherein each pixel region of the plurality of pixel regions comprises a light guide. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify light emitting display device of Templier and Pan with the light guide of Coleman in order to collect the light from each pixel and then splits it into multiple emission locations (Coleman; para. 0053). Claim(s) 18, 20 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) in view of Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199) in view of Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800). Regarding claim 18, Templier discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B), a processor element (control circuit 150) comprising active circuitry to control operation of the first optical element, wherein the processor element is directly bonded to the first optical element (pg. 6 5th para.; the control circuit 150 by hybrid direct bonding, that is to say by direct metal-metal bonding of the electrodes 111 of the circuit 100 to the connection pads 161 of the circuit 150 and the electrode 113 of the circuit 100 on the electrode 163 of the circuit 150, and by direct dielectric-dielectric bonding of the insulation walls 115 of the circuit 100 on the insulating rings 165 of the circuit 150 By direct bonding here is meant a molecular-type bonding, without adding adhesive material or solder to the interface between the LED circuit 100 and the control circuit 150). Templier fails to teach a first plurality of light guides to output the first light, wherein the first plurality of light guides comprises a first light guide and a second light guide. Coleman discloses a first plurality of light guides (emission ports 920 of shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 9) to output the first light, wherein the first plurality of light guides comprises a first light guide and a second light guide (shown in fig. 9 below). PNG media_image2.png 396 497 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify light emitting display device of Templier and Pan with the light guide of Coleman in order to collect the light from each pixel and then splits it into multiple emission locations (Coleman; para. 0053). Templier as modified by Coleman fails to teach wherein the second pixel region outputs a second color light different than the first color light. Pan discloses the second pixel region outputs a second color light (red color LED 404b of fig. 4A) different than the first color light (blue color LED 404a of fig. 4A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify light emitting display device of Templier and Coleman with the 3-color LED array of Pan in order to increase the color gamut of the display device. Regarding claim 20, Templier discloses a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); wherein the processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B), the first and second dielectric bonding surfaces are directly bonded without an intervening adhesive and the first and second plurality of contact pads are directly bonded and electrically connected to one another without an intervening adhesive (pg. 9 1st para.; the control circuit 250 by hybrid direct bonding, that is to say by direct metal-metal bonding of the connection pads 205 of the circuit 200 on the connection pads 255 of the circuit 250, and direct dielectric-dielectric bonding of the dielectric layer 203 of the circuit 200 on the dielectric layer 253 of the circuit 250). Regarding claim 21, Templier discloses wherein a pitch of the first array of optical emitters is less than 10 microns (pg. 8 2nd para.; the inter-pixel pitch p2 of the device is between 2 and 30 μm, and the width of the elementary LEDs is between 0.5 and 25 μm). Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Templier et al. (WO 2019180362) and Coleman et al. (WO 2018204199) and Pan (US PG Pub. 20180114800) as applied to claim 18 above, and further in view of Balogh (CN 111684512 A). Regarding claim 19, Templier as modified by Pan and Coleman discloses a bonded optical device (LED emitting display device of fig. 2B) comprising: a first plurality of optical emitters (plurality of LEDs 103 of fig. 2A and 2B) to emit light into a first plurality of pixel regions (shown below in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), wherein the first plurality of pixel regions includes a first pixel region and a second pixel region (shown in the examiners illustration of fig. 2B), a first dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 203 of fig. 2B) coupled to the plurality of optical emitters (103), wherein the first dielectric bonding surface (203) comprises a first plurality of contact pads (metal connection pads 205 of fig. 2B); and at least one processor element (control circuit 250 of fig. 2B) comprising a second dielectric bonding surface (dielectric layer 253 of fig. 2B) having a second plurality of contact pads (connection pads 255 of fig. 2B) and an active circuitry to control operation of the plurality of pixels (103). Templier as modified by Coleman and Pan fails to teach further comprising a second plurality of optical emitters, wherein the first and second plurality of optical emitters are laterally offset from one another along a direction parallel to the first dielectric bonding surface. Balogh discloses LED display further comprising a second plurality of optical emitters, wherein the first and second plurality of optical emitters are laterally offset from one another along a direction parallel to the first dielectric bonding surface (pg. 6 5th para.; sub-pixel in the pixel region p, sub pixel can be arranged in more rows, row can be offset relative to each other). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the light emitting display device of Templier, Pan and Coleman with offset arrangement of Balogh in order to reach the highest optical density for optimum resolution (Balogh; pg. 6 3rd para.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANELL L OWENS whose telephone number is (571)270-5365. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am-5:00pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANELL L OWENS/ Examiner, Art Unit 2882 21 July 2026 /TOAN TON/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12689742
A SENSING SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681373
COLOR WHEEL MODULE AND PROJECTION DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684096
IMAGING SYSTEM INCLUDING BEAM GUIDING ELEMENT HAVING HIGH SOLARIZATION RESISTANCE IN THE BLUE SPECTRAL RANGE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681370
Projection device
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663627
IMAGING SYSTEM AND PROJECTION APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.9%)
2y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 755 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month