Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/820,806

FOLDABLE ARTICLES OF FURNITURE AND METHODS OF ASSEMBLING FOLDABLE ARTICLES OF FURNITURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Examiner
WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zinus Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 857 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
903
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 857 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim is 1-3 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Pub No.: 20160331128 (“Chuang et al.”) Regarding Claims 1-3 and 8-9, Chuang et al. discloses an apparatus (10), comprising: a first panel (14) comprising a plurality of foldable portions (along each side edge, via hinges); a plurality of plates (12) attachable to the plurality of foldable portions (along each side edge, via hinges) of the first panel (14), wherein the first panel (14) and the plurality of plates (12) are configured to form a first sub-assembly (10) of an article of furniture (best seen in Figs. 1 and 11); and a second sub-assembly (52) configured to attach to or interface with the first sub- assembly to form the article of furniture, wherein the first sub-assembly (10) and the second sub-assembly (52) correspond to different portions, components, or sub-assemblies of the article of furniture (dresser). Regarding Claim 2, Chuang et al. discloses wherein the first sub-assembly (10) comprises a cabinet and dresser (as seen in Figs. 1 and 11). Regarding Claim 3, Chuang et al. discloses wherein the second sub-assembly (52) comprises a drawer (as seen in Fig. 11) Regarding Claim 8, Chuang et al. discloses wherein the first panel (14) comprises a sheet material (as envisaged in Figs.1 and 11). Regarding Claim 9, Chuang et al. discloses wherein the sheet material comprises a metallic (as envisaged in Figs.1 and 11). Claims 1-3, 5-6, 8-10, 13-14 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent No.: 2461219 (“LEW”). Regarding Claim 1, LEW discloses an apparatus, comprising: a first panel (1) comprising a plurality of foldable portions (each side portion, via hinges 6) ; a plurality of plates (5) attachable to the plurality of foldable portions (each side portion, via hinges 6) of the first panel (1), wherein the first panel (1) and the plurality of plates (5) are configured to form a first sub-assembly (cabinet) of an article of furniture ; and a second sub-assembly (shelf or doors) configured to attach to or interface with the first sub- assembly to form the article of furniture, wherein the first sub-assembly (cabinet) and the second sub-assembly (shelf or doors) correspond to different portions, components, or sub-assemblies of the article of furniture (cabinet); Claim Regarding Claim 2, LEW discloses wherein the first sub-assembly (cabinet) comprises a cabinet. Regarding Claim 3, LEW discloses wherein the second sub-assembly (doors 9) comprises a drawer 3. Regarding Claim 5, LEW discloses wherein the second sub-assembly (shelf 26) is insertable into and/or removable from the first sub-assembly (cabinet). Regarding Claim 6, LEW discloses wherein the plurality of foldable portions (each side portion, via hinges 6) of the first panel correspond to one or more sections or peripheral edges of the first panel (side edges of 1). Regarding Claim 8, LEW discloses wherein the first panel (1) comprises a sheet material. Regarding Claim 9, LEW discloses wherein the sheet material comprises a metallic material. Regarding Claim 10, LEW discloses wherein the plurality of plates (5) are configured to form one or more walls, sides, or surfaces of the first sub-assembly (cabinet) when (i) the plurality of plates are attached to the plurality of foldable portions (foldable portions, via hinges 6) of the first panel (1) and (ii) the plurality of foldable portions (foldable portions, via hinges 6) of the first panel (1) are folded relative to one or more other portions of the first panel (1, via hinges 6). Regarding Claim 13, LEW discloses further comprising one or more fasteners (hinge 6, as seen in Fig.1) for attaching the plurality of plates (5) to the plurality of foldable portions (foldable portions, via hinges 6) of the first panel (1). Regarding Claim 14 LEW discloses further comprising one or more rails (14) integrated with or attached to at least one of the plurality of plates (5), wherein the second sub-assembly (shelf 26) is configured to slide along the one or more rails to permit extension or a retraction of the second sub-assembly (shelf 26) relative to the first sub-assembly (cabinet). Regarding Claim 16, LEW discloses wherein the plurality of plates (5) are attachable to the first panel (1) when the first panel (1) is provided in a flat, unfolded configuration (as seen in Fig.1). Claims 1-6,10-11, 13-14, 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 108338547 (“XU et al.” Regarding Claim 1, XU et al. discloses an apparatus, comprising: a first panel (1) comprising a plurality of foldable portions (each side edge, via hinges); a plurality of plates (11) attachable to the plurality of foldable portions of the first panel (1), wherein the first panel (1) and the plurality of plates (11) are configured to form a first sub-assembly (dresser) of an article of furniture; and a second sub-assembly drawer box 6) configured to attach to or interface with the first sub- assembly (dresser) to form the article of furniture, wherein the first sub-assembly (dresser) and the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) correspond to different portions, components, or sub-assemblies of the article of furniture. Regarding Claim 2, XU et al. discloses wherein the first sub-assembly (dresser) comprises a dresser. Regarding Claim 3, XU et al. discloses wherein the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) comprises a drawer. Regarding Claim 4, XU et al. discloses wherein the second-sub assembly (drawer box 6) comprises: a second panel (31) comprising a plurality of foldable portions; and one or more additional plates (33, 34) attachable to at least one foldable portion of the plurality of foldable portions (each side edge, via hinges 36) of the second panel (31), wherein the second panel (31) and the one or more additional plates (33, 34) are configured to form the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) of the article of furniture. Regarding Claim 5, XU et al. discloses wherein the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) is insertable into and/or removable from the first sub-assembly (dresser cabinet). Regarding Claim 6, XU et al. discloses wherein the plurality of foldable portions (each side edge, via hinges) of the first panel correspond to one or more sections or peripheral edges of the first panel (1). Regarding Claim 10, XU et al. discloses wherein the plurality of plates (11) are configured to form one or more walls, sides, or surfaces of the first sub-assembly (dresser) when (i) the plurality of plates are attached to the plurality of foldable portions of the first panel (1) and (ii) the plurality of foldable portions of the first panel (1) are folded relative to one or more other portions of the first panel (1, via hinges along each side edge). Regarding Claim 11, XU et al. discloses wherein the one or more additional plates (33, 34) are configured to form one or more walls, sides, or surfaces of the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) when (i) the one or more additional plates (33, 34) are attached to the at least one foldable portion of the plurality of foldable portions (along each side edge) of the second panel (31) and (ii) the at least one foldable portion of the second panel (31) is folded relative to one or more other portions of the second panel (31). Regarding Claim 13 , XU et al. discloses further comprising one or more fasteners (hinges) for attaching the plurality of plates (11) to the plurality of foldable portions of the first panel (1). Regarding Claim 14 , XU et al. discloses further comprising one or more rails (12) integrated with or attached to at least one of the plurality of plates (11), wherein the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) is configured to slide along the one or more rails (12) to permit extension or a retraction of the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) relative to the first sub-assembly (dresser cabinet). Regarding Claim 16 , XU et al. discloses further comprising wherein the plurality of plates (11) are attachable to the first panel (1) when the first panel (1) is provided in a flat, unfolded configuration (the side plates are capable of being attached in the flat, unfolded configuration). Regarding Claim 17, XU et al. discloses wherein the one or more additional plates (33, 34) are attachable to the second panel (31) after at least one foldable portion of the second panel (31) is folded relative to one or more other portions of the second panel (31). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims19-23 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 103(a) as being unpatentable over CN 108338547 (“XU et al.”) Regarding Claim 19, XU et al. discloses a method, comprising: (a) attaching a plurality of plates (11) to a plurality of foldable portions (each side edge, via hinges) of a first panel (1), wherein the first panel (1) and the plurality of plates (11) are configured to form a first sub-assembly (dresser) of an article of furniture when the plurality of plates (11) are folded relative to the first panel (1); and (b) attaching a second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) of the article of furniture to the first sub- assembly (dresser) to form the article of furniture, wherein the first sub-assembly (dresser) and the second sub-assembly correspond to different portions, components, or sub-assemblies of the article of furniture. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention that of the invention to assemble and use the article of furniture according to the method steps set forth above, since XU et al. discloses the claimed invention of claim 19 such method steps would occur during the ordinary course using the article of furniture, see MPEP 2112.02 Regarding Claim 20, XU et al. discloses further comprising, prior to (b), forming the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) of the article of furniture by attaching one or more additional plates (33, 34) to at least one foldable portion of a plurality of foldable portions of a second panel (31). Regarding Claim 21, XU et al. discloses wherein the second panel (31) and the one or more additional plates (33, 34) are configured to form the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) of the article of furniture when the at least one foldable portion (along each side edge) of the second panel (31) is folded relative to one or more other portions of the second panel (31). Regarding Claim 22, XU et al. discloses wherein the plurality of foldable portions (along each side edge) of the first panel (1) correspond to one or more sections or peripheral edges of the first panel (1). Regarding Claim 23 XU et al. discloses wherein the plurality of plates (11) are attachable to the first panel (1) when the first panel (1) is provided in a flat, unfolded configuration (the side plates are capable of being attached in the flat, unfolded configuration) Regarding Claim 25, XU et al. discloses wherein the first sub-assembly (dresser) comprises a cabinet and the second sub-assembly (drawer box 6) comprises one or more drawers. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLEY S WRIGHT whose telephone number is (571)270-3328. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 12:30-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy can be reached on 5712703742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIMBERLEY S WRIGHT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601538
REFRIGERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575670
Customizable Cabinet
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569065
FURNITURE AND FURNITURE PART ASSEMBLY THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566480
MOUNT BRACKET, STORAGE DEVICE ASSEMBLY, AND SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12543285
CONNECTOR, HOST AND DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 857 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month