Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Priority
Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55.
Specification
The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Grober (US 10440835 hereinafter Grober).
In regards to claim 1, Grober discloses;” A circuit board (Abstract) comprising: a build-up insulating layer including a plurality of layers stacked along a vertical direction (Col. 2, Lines 34-49); and a via electrode passing through an upper surface of the build-up insulating layer and a lower surface of the build-up insulating layer (Col. 2, Lines 34-49, Fig. 4 (shown)), wherein the via electrode includes: a through portion passing through the upper surface and the lower surface of the build-up insulating layer along the vertical direction (Fig. 2 (108, 151)); and a protruding portion protruding from the through portion along a horizontal direction perpendicular to the vertical direction (Fig. 4 (118)), and wherein the protruding portion is positioned between the upper surface and the lower surface of the build-up insulating layer (Fig. 4 (shows 118 is between the upper surface and lower surface of 102)).”
In regards to claim 2, Grober discloses; “The circuit board of claim 1, wherein a side surface of the via electrode has a step along the vertical direction (Fig. 4 (shown)).”
In regards to claim 3, Grober discloses;” The circuit board of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the protruding portion is positioned at an interface between the plurality of layers of the build-up insulating layer (Fig. 4 (shows via as an interface for 148).”
In regards to claim 9, Grober discloses;” The circuit board of claim 1, wherein the through portion of the via electrode has an inclination, and wherein the protruding portion protrudes from the slope of the through portion (Fig. 34 (shown)).”
In regards to claim 10, Grober discloses;” The circuit board of claim 9, wherein the through portion includes: a first slope in which a width in the horizontal direction gradually increases from an upper surface of the via electrode to a lower surface of the via electrode and a second slope in which a width in the horizontal direction gradually decreases from the upper surface of the via electrode to the lower surface of the via electrode (Fig. 4 (shown)).”
In regards to claim 11, Grober discloses;” The circuit board of claim 1, comprising: a lower pad connected to a lower surface of the via electrode; and an upper pad connected to an upper surface of the via electrode (Fig. 4 (148, 150)).”
In regards to claim 16, Grober discloses;” The circuit board of claim 2, wherein at least a portion of the protruding portion is positioned at an interface between the plurality of layers of the build-up insulating layer (Col. 2, Lines 34-49, Fig. 4 (shown)).”
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 4-8, 12-15, and 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL F MCALLISTER whose telephone number is (571)272-2453. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7 AM-4 PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/MICHAEL F MCALLISTER/Examiner, Art Unit 2847
/TIMOTHY J THOMPSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Prosecution Insights