Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/821,171

BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEMS

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 13, 2017 — provisional 62/470,470 +4 more
Examiner
BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Globus Medical Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
695 granted / 992 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1010
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . According to the Amendment filed on 9/14/26, Claims 1, 3, 11 are amended, and claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 3 was previously rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor . Applicant has amended claim 3 to fix the issue. The rejection is moot. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Langdale (US. 20170056081) in view of Grady (US 20060095044 A1). Langdale discloses a method of treating a fracture of a bone, comprising providing a tibia bone plate para. 5, the tibia bone plate including: a head including a plurality of bone screw holes fig. 1E , a shaft fig. 1D disposed distally of the head, the shaft including: a first set of holes having first and second locking holes 120, fig. 1A longitudinally spaced from each other, and a second set of holes disposed proximally of the first set of holes and having a dynamic compression slot 120 and a third locking hole 128 longitudinally spaced from each other , wherein the first set of holes and the second set of holes are disposed on the shaft such that the first locking hole 120 is directly adjacent to the second locking hole 120 and the dynamic compression slot 120 is directly adjacent to the second locking hole 120 and the third locking hole 128. PNG media_image1.png 538 467 media_image1.png Greyscale positioning the tibia bone plate to the bone; and securing the tibia bone plate to the bone using one or more of the plurality of bone screw holes, the first set of holes, and the second set of holes fig. 4a, wherein every locking hole is a fixed angle locking hole para. 7, 8, 11, wherein the first dynamic compression slot is a bi- directional dynamic compression slot para. 48, wherein the shaft further includes a third set of holes (see modified fig. 1d below) longitudinally spaced from each other and disposed proximally of the second set of holes, the third set including fourth and fifth locking holes, wherein the shaft further includes a fourth set of holes (see modified fig. 1d below) longitudinally spaced from each other and disposed distally of the first set of holes, the fourth set including a sixth locking hole and a bi-directional dynamic compression slot, wherein the shaft further includes a group of a locking hole and a dynamic compression slot longitudinally spaced from each other and disposed distally of the first set of holes fig. 1d, wherein the locking hole of the group is disposed distally of the dynamic compression slot of the group fig. 1d, wherein the tibia bone plate further includes a neck (see modified fig. 1d below) disposed between the head and the shaft, and comprises at least three kickstand holes, wherein the plurality of bone screw holes in the head includes a first row of holes 122 and a second row of holes 120b, fig. 1E, the second row of holes 120b disposed distally of the first row holes 122 and are larger than the first row of holes fig. 1E, wherein the head further comprises at least one k-wire hole 124, further comprising a plurality of spaced indentations (that receive screw 168, fig. 3) configured to receive an aiming guide 160a. PNG media_image2.png 230 856 media_image2.png Greyscale Langdale fails to teach using an aiming guide comprising an aiming arm and an attachment guide, the aiming arm having a proximal end, a distal end, a first side, and a second side, the aiming arm comprising a plurality of openings, wherein each of the plurality of openings is spaced at predetermined intervals between the proximal end and the distal end, and the attachment guide operatively connected to the first side of the proximal end of the aiming arm, the attachment guide including at least one opening that is coaxial with at least one bone screw hole in the plurality of bone screw holes in a neck portion of the tibia bone plate, the attachment guide configured to receive a first end of an attachment post through the at least one opening, the attachment post having a second end comprising at least one ball end pin and a stabilizing protrusion configured to engage with the neck portion of the tibia bone plate. Grady teaches using an aiming guide comprising an aiming arm 30, fig. 2 and an attachment guide 10, the aiming arm 30 having a proximal end, a distal end, a first side, and a second side fig. 2, the aiming arm comprising a plurality of openings fig. 3, wherein each of the plurality of openings is spaced at predetermined intervals between the proximal end and the distal end fig. 3, and the attachment guide 10 operatively connected to the first side of the proximal end of the aiming arm, the attachment guide 10 including at least one opening that is coaxial with at least one bone screw hole in the plurality of bone screw holes in a neck portion of the tibia bone plate fig. 2, the attachment guide 10 configured to receive a first end of an attachment post 40, fig. 4a through the at least one opening, the attachment post 40 having a second end 43 comprising at least one ball end pin configured to engage with the neck portion of the tibia bone plate fig. 3. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Langdale with an aiming guide comprising an aiming arm and an attachment guide in view of Grady in order to facilitating guiding and aiming the insertion of bone screws through the holes of the plate. Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-20 under Langdale have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Grady. Conclusion Applicants’ amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMEH RAAFAT BOLES whose telephone number is (571)270-5537. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong can be reached at 571-272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMEH R BOLES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Sep 14, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746053
Electrosurgical Device and Method of Use
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745998
ANCHOR APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746018
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MID-FLEXION BALANCING DURING KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740873
SHOULDER PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740776
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PERFORMING A KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+24.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month