Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/821,190

SENSOR DEVICE

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Examiner
SADIO, INSA
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
660 granted / 817 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
828
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 817 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 11/07/2025 has been considered. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. The patent claims include all of the limitations of the instant application claims, respectively. The patent claims also include additional limitations. Hence, the instant application claims are generic to the species of invention covered by the respective patent claims. As such, the instant application claims are anticipated by the patent claims and are therefore not patentably distinct therefrom. (See Eli Lilly and Co. v. Barr Laboratories Inc., 58 USPQ2D 1869, "a later genus claim limitation is anticipated by, and therefore not patentably distinct from, an earlier species claim", In re Goodman, 29 USPQ2d 2010, "Thus, the generic invention is 'anticipated' by the species of the patented invention" and the instant “application claims are generic to species of invention covered by the patent claim, and since without terminal disclaimer, extant species claims preclude issuance of generic application claims”). Claim(s) 2-21 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,079,409. The present application claims the same subject matter of sensor device, which is same as the US patent 12,079,409. For example: 18/821,190 12,079,409 2. (New) A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having first metal wires, and the second part having second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first parts has a first intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires intersect. 1. A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having a first mesh shape which is formed of first metal wires, and the second part having a second mesh shape which is formed of second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first mash shape and the second mash shape has an intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires or two of the second metal wires intersect. 3. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein the second part has a second intersection portion at which two of the second metal wires intersect. 1. A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having a first mesh shape which is formed of first metal wires, and the second part having a second mesh shape which is formed of second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first mash shape and the second mash shape has an intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires or two of the second metal wires intersect. 4 (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein detection signals are detected by the electrodes. 2. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein detection signals are detected by the electrodes. 5. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein a longitudinal direction of the first parts is a second direction different from the first direction. 3. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein a longitudinal direction of the first parts is a second direction different from the first direction. 6. (New) The sensor device according to claim 5, wherein at least one of the first parts has a first segment and a second segment which are included in the first metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the first segment is a third direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the second segment is a fourth direction different from the first to third directions. 4. The sensor device according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the first parts has a first segment and a second segment which are included in the first metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the first segment is a third direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the second segment is a fourth direction different from the first to third directions. 7. (New) The sensor device according to claim 5, wherein the second part has a third segment and a fourth segment which are included in the second metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the third segment is a fifth direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the fourth segment is a sixth direction different from the first direction, the second direction, and the fifth direction. 5. The sensor device according to claim 3, wherein the second part has a third segment and a fourth segment which are included in the second metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the third segment is a fifth direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the fourth segment is a sixth direction different from the first direction, the second direction, and the fifth direction. 8. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein each of the first parts has a strip structure formed of an assembly of the first metal wires. 6. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein each of the first parts has a strip structure formed of an assembly of the first metal wires. 9. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein at least one of the first metal wires has a first bent portion. 7. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first metal wires has a first bent portion. 10. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein at least one of the second metal wires has a second bent portion. 8. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the second metal wires has a second bent portion. 11. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein the second metal wires include a first wire which is in physical contact with the first parts, and a longitudinal direction of the first wire is the first direction. 9. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein the second metal wires include a first wire which is physical contact with the first parts, and a longitudinal direction of the first wire is the first direction. 12. (New) The sensor device according to claim 11 wherein the second metal wires include a second wire which is opposed to the first wire, and the second wire is in physical contact with a lead line which connects the second wire with a detection circuit. 10. The sensor device according to claim 9 wherein the second metal wires include a second wire which is opposed to the first wire, and the second wire is physical contact with a lead line which connects the second wire with a detection circuit. 13. (New) The sensor device according to claim 2, wherein the second part is connected to a lead line, the second part is between the lead line and the first parts, and the lead line is wider than each of the first and second metal wires. 11. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein the second part is connected to a lead line, the second part is between the lead line and the first parts, and the lead line is wider than each of the first and second metal wires. 14. (New) A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having first metal wires, and the second part having second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and the second part has a second intersection portion at which two of the second metal wires intersect 1. A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having a first mesh shape which is formed of first metal wires, and the second part having a second mesh shape which is formed of second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first mash shape and the second mash shape has an intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires or two of the second metal wires intersect. 15. (New) The sensor device according to claim 14, wherein detection signals are detected by the electrodes. 2. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein detection signals are detected by the electrodes. 16. (New) The sensor device according to claim 14, wherein a longitudinal direction of the first parts is a second direction different from the first direction. 3. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein a longitudinal direction of the first parts is a second direction different from the first direction. 17. (New) The sensor device according to claim 16, wherein at least one of the first parts has a first segment and a second segment which are included in the first metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the first segment is a third direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the second segment is a fourth direction different from the first to third directions. 4. The sensor device according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the first parts has a first segment and a second segment which are included in the first metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the first segment is a third direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the second segment is a fourth direction different from the first to third directions. 18. (New) The sensor device according to claim 16, wherein the second part has a third segment and a fourth segment which are included in the second metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the third segment is a fifth direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the fourth segment is a sixth direction different from the first direction, the second direction, and the fifth direction. 5. The sensor device according to claim 3, wherein the second part has a third segment and a fourth segment which are included in the second metal wires, a longitudinal direction of the third segment is a fifth direction different from the first and second directions, and a longitudinal direction of the fourth segment is a sixth direction different from the first direction, the second direction, and the fifth direction. 19. (New) An electrode of a sensor comprising: first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having first metal wires, and the second part having second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first parts has a first intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires intersect. 1. A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having a first mesh shape which is formed of first metal wires, and the second part having a second mesh shape which is formed of second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first mash shape and the second mash shape has an intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires or two of the second metal wires intersect. 20. (New) The electrode of the sensor according to claim 19, wherein the second part has a second intersection portion at which two of the second metal wires intersect. 1. A sensor device comprising: electrodes each including first parts arranged in a first direction and a second part connected to the first parts, the first parts each having a first mesh shape which is formed of first metal wires, and the second part having a second mesh shape which is formed of second metal wires, wherein a longitudinal direction of the second part is the first direction, and at least one of the first mash shape and the second mash shape has an intersection portion at which two of the first metal wires or two of the second metal wires intersect. 21. (New) The electrode of the sensor according to claim 19, wherein a longitudinal direction of the first parts is a second direction different from the first direction. 3. The sensor device according to claim 1, wherein a longitudinal direction of the first parts is a second direction different from the first direction. Claim(s) 2-21 are allowable over the prior art of record. The rejection(s) under the obvious double patenting rejection, set forth in this Office action, would need to be overcome. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 2-21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on all reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to INSA SADIO whose telephone number is (571)270-5580. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am-6:00 am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN K PATEL can be reached at 571-272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. INSA . SADIO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2628 /INSA SADIO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
May 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Nov 07, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585149
Liquid Crystal On Silicon Display Device Having Stacked Integrated Circuit Substrates
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587630
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING 3D IMAGE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579937
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS, DRIVING APPARATUS AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578598
LIGHT CONTROL SHEETS AND METHODS OF PRODUCING LIGHT CONTROL SHEETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579939
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 817 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month