Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/821,641

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NOTIFICATION MESSAGE TRANSMISSION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Examiner
JAIN, RAJ K
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Asus Technology Licensing Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
717 granted / 818 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 818 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2,7-8,13-14 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FUJISHIRO et al (US 20230239714 A1) hereinafter as FUJISHIRO in view of KAWANO et al (US 20240147344 A1) hereinafter as KAWANO. Regarding claim(s) 1,7 and 13, FUJISHIRO discloses a method for notification message transmission (See Fig(s). 9 PC5 messaging between 100a and 100b), comprising: performing, by a UE-to-UE (U2U) relay UE, a discovery procedure (See Fig(s). 7, step S1, See ¶ 66, the remote UE 100A and the relay UE 100B perform a relay UE discovery procedure. ); establishing a U2U relay UE a first PC5 Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection with a first remote UE (See Fig(s). 6, Relay UE with RRc to 100a, See ¶ .. 63.. The U2U relay is a mode in which the relay UE 100B performs relay between the remote UE 100A and another UE 100C. Here, sidelink connection is established between the relay UE 100B and the remote UE 100A and between the relay UE 100B and another UE 100C.), and establishes one or more second PC5 RRC connections with one or more additional remote UEs (See Fig(s). 7 steps S2-S3, See ¶ 67) so that the first remote UE can communicate with the one or more additional remote UEs via the U2U relay UE (again See Fig(s). 6, See ¶ .. 63, 66-68, 79. A PC5-RRC message for various configurations is transmitted between the PC5-RRC layer of the remote UE 100A and the PC5-RRC layer of the relay UE 100B. When a connection (PC5-RRC connection) between the PC5-RRC of the remote UE 100A and the PC5-RRC of the relay UE 100B is present, the remote UE 100A may be in a PC5-RRC connected state); detecting a PC5 radio link failure (RLF) of a second PC5 RRC connection established with a second remote UE among the one or more additional remote UEs (See Fig(s). 6, See ¶ 182, ; a case of the U2U relay, the relay UE 100B may detect at least one of an RLF in sidelink connection with another UE 100C, PC5-RRC connection release, PC5-S connection release, a failure in PC5-RRC connection establishment, and a failure in PC5-S connection establishment.); transmitting the U2U relay UE a notification message to the first remote UE (See Fig(s). 6-7, See ¶ .. 66.. in Step S1, the remote UE 100A and the relay UE 100B perform a relay UE discovery procedure. The relay UE discovery procedure has a method in which the relay UE 100B gives a notification of presence of the relay UE 100B itself through transmission of a discovery message, and a method in which the remote UE 100A searches for the relay UE 100B through transmission of a discovery message.). an indication of a PC5 RLF with the second remote UE (See ¶ .. 182.. in a case of the U2U relay, the relay UE 100B may detect at least one of an RLF in sidelink connection with another UE 100C, PC5-RRC connection release, PC5-S connection release, a failure in PC5-RRC connection establishment, and a failure in PC5-S connection establishment.). FUJISHIRO fails to disclose, after the first PC5 RRC connection between the U2U relay UE and the first remote UE has been established wherein the notification message includes a sidelink indication type and information identifying a second remote UE among the one or more additional remote UEs…and the information identifying the second remote UE is a layer-2 identity of the second remote UE. KAWANO discloses wherein notification is sent after the first PC5 RRC connection between the U2U relay UE and the first remote UE has been established (See ¶ 71 The PC5-RRC connection is a logical connection between two UEs corresponding to a pair of source L2ID and destination L2ID, and is considered to be established after a corresponding PC5 unicast link is established.) the notification message includes a sidelink indication type and information identifying a second remote UE among the one or more additional remote UEs (See ¶ .. 101.. there may be a type other than ProSe Direct Discovery for discovering another UE in order to perform direct communication with another UE, specifically, there may be Group member Discovery for discovering one or more UEs in order to perform communication within a group using a sidelink, 5G ProSe UE-to-Network Relay Discovery for discovering candidate relay UEs…. See Fig(s). 6, 8, See ¶ .. 157.. The information may be notified to one remote UE, or may be notified to multiple remote UEs. The U2U relay UE may notify the remote UE of the information by transmitting a PC5-RRC message including the information to the remote UE, or by transmitting a MAC CE to the remote UE. The information may be information simply indicating the proximity, may additionally include information capable of identifying a remote UE in proximity, may include information indicating a degree of proximity, and may include the SL-RSRP-1 and/or the SL-RSRP-2 ). Kawano further also discloses an indication of a PC5 radio link failure (RLF) with the second remote UE (See Fig(s). 1, See ¶ 71, 157). Kawano further discloses UE, and the information identifying the second remote UE is a layer-2 identity (ID) of the second remote UE (See ¶ 33, SL communication is performed in one of the transmission modes using a pair of a source layer-2 (L2) identifier (ID) and a destination layer-2 (L2) identifier (ID). The source layer-2 identifier and the destination layer-2 identifier may be referred to as a source L2ID and a destination L2ID). The U2U relay terminal apparatus is responsible to relay communication between the first terminal apparatus and the second terminal apparatus successfully with proper configuration parameters for all UEs without interruption and delay. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate the teachings of KAWANO within FUJISHIRO, so as to enhance overall UEs performance by ensuring proper PC5 link establishment for all UEs concerned. Regarding claim(s) 2, 8, KAWANO discloses wherein each PC5 RRC connection of the first PC5 RRC connection and the one or more second PC5 RRC connections is a Layer-2 link over PC5 reference point (See ¶ .. 71.. the PC5-RRC connection, and in a case that a layer 2 link release procedure is completed, the UE releases the PC5-RRC connection). Reasons for combining same as claim 1. Regarding claim(s) 14, FUJISHIRO discloses and one or more second PC5 RRC connections are established between the U2U relay UE and the one or more additional remote UEs (again See Fig(s). 6, See ¶ .. 63, 66-68, 79. A PC5-RRC message for various configurations is transmitted between the PC5-RRC layer of the remote UE 100A and the PC5-RRC layer of the relay UE 100B. When a connection (PC5-RRC connection) between the PC5-RRC of the remote UE 100A and the PC5-RRC of the relay UE 100B is present, the remote UE 100A may be in a PC5-RRC connected state). Regarding claim(s) 16, FUJISHIRO discloses wherein the notification message is transmitted when the PC5 RLF with the second remote UE is detected by the U2U relay UE (See Fig(s). 16 step S404, See ¶ .. 182, 184... The relay UE 100B may detect that received power (RSRP) of a reference signal received from another UE 100C or throughput of sidelink communication with another UE 100C has fallen below a threshold, or that resource utilization (occupancy) of sidelink communication with another UE 100C has exceeded a threshold). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Raj Jain whose telephone number is (571) 272-3145. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th ~8 ~6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached on 571-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /RAJ JAIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 25, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 27, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 28, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 06, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 07, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12568472
CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORTING BASED ON SUB-RESOURCE POOLS FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568514
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568512
Method and Apparatus for Determining Sidelink Transmission Resource
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563561
SIGNALING ASPECTS OF APERIODIC CSI REPORTING TRIGGERED BY A DOWNLINK GRANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563578
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RESERVING RESOURCES IN NR V2X
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 818 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month