Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/822,378

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR SETTING LONG SHEET PRINTING, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 02, 2024
Priority
Sep 01, 2023 — JP 2023-142388
Examiner
WASHINGTON, JAMARES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
559 granted / 685 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
84.9%
+44.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 685 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/02/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2 and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kaneoka Hiromichi et al (JP 2024011121 A) in view of Hideaki Ooba (US 20180181043 A1). Regarding claim 1, Hiromichi et al discloses an information processing apparatus capable of communicating with an image forming apparatus (¶ [37] job generation device; ¶ [1] generation device generates sheet to be executed by a sheet processing device) that includes a creasing mechanism that provides a crease for folding to the long sheet at multiple sites in a longitudinal direction (¶ [9] creasing direction selection; ¶ [19] sheet size and creasing information for printed product; ¶ [45] sheet processing device having a “creasing section”), comprising a controller that receives a setting for a job related to the image formation and sends an instruction to the image forming apparatus (¶ [37]), wherein the controller performs: receiving a selection of the long sheet, a setting of a creasing function that provides the crease to the selected long sheet, and a setting of a position of the crease (¶ [37] size information, ¶ [37] creasing information and creasing position setting); determining the position where the crease is provided according to the setting (¶ [38]); and displaying, on a screen of the information processing apparatus, a display image corresponding to the selected long sheet on which the display image of a print document and the position of the crease are superimposed, thereby receiving the setting of the position of the crease (¶ [37] preview unit 82; display 800). Hiromichi fails to explicitly disclose an image former that forms an image on a long sheet. Ooba, in the same field of endeavor of an image forming apparatus capable of determining crease processing on sheets (Abstract), teaches an image former that forms an image on a long sheet (¶ [31] and ¶ [35]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed for the information processing apparatus as disclosed by Hiromichi et al comprising a controller which performs determining the position where a crease is provided according to a setting of a creasing function and a setting of a position of the crease to utilize the teachings of Ooba which teaches an image former that forms an image on a long sheet to enable creasing and other post-processing functionality to sheets that have undergone printing and account for the location of the image to determine crease positions. Regarding claim 2, Hiromichi et al discloses the information processing apparatus according to claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1), wherein the controller performs: displaying on the screen a predetermined position corresponding to a size of the selected long sheet as an initial position of the crease (¶ [52]); and receiving an adjustment that changes the position of each crease in the longitudinal direction from the initial position, moving the position of the crease on the screen according to the received adjustment, and displaying the resulting position of the crease (¶ [38] and ¶ [52-53]). Regarding claim 7, Hiromichi et al discloses the information processing apparatus according to claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1), wherein the controller receives the setting for the creasing function that folds the long sheet in thirds (¶ [56]). Regarding claim 8, Hiromichi et al discloses a method for setting long sheet printing, wherein in an information processing apparatus capable of communicating with an image forming apparatus that includes an image former that forms an image on a long sheet and a creasing mechanism that provides a crease for folding to the long sheet at multiple sites in a longitudinal direction, a controller that receives a setting for a job related to the image formation and sends an instruction to the image forming apparatus performs (see rejection of claim 1): receiving a selection of the long sheet, a setting of a creasing function that provides the crease to the selected long sheet, and a setting of a position of the crease (see rejection of claim 1); and determining the position where the crease is provided according to the setting, wherein in the receiving of the setting, the controller displays, on a screen of the information processing apparatus, a display image corresponding to the selected long sheet on which the display image of a print document and the position of the crease are superimposed, thereby receiving the setting of the position of the crease (see rejection of claim 1). Regarding claim 9, Hiromichi et al discloses an image forming apparatus (sheet processing device as rejected in claim 1) comprising: an image former that forms an image on a long sheet (see rejection of claim 1); a creasing mechanism that provides a crease for folding to the long sheet at multiple sites in a longitudinal direction (see rejection of claim 1); a communication circuit that communicates with an external information processing apparatus (¶ [1] indicates the apparatus communicates with the sheet processing job generation device to execute the processing job); and a job controller that performs processing in response to a job setting and instruction related to the image formation received from the information processing apparatus via the communication circuit, wherein the job controller performs, if the received job setting includes a creasing function, a control for forming an image on a specified long sheet and provision of the crease at a specified position on the long sheet (see rejection of claim 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMARES Q WASHINGTON whose telephone number is (571) 270-1585. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Akwasi M. Sarpong can be reached at (571) 270-3438. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMARES Q WASHINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2681 June 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12654437
IMAGE INSPECTION APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, IMAGE INSPECTION SYSTEM, IMAGE INSPECTION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650793
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR SETTING A REGION TO BE INSPECTED BY READING AN IMAGE ON A SHEET
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642511
COLOR MAP GENERATION TECHNIQUES FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY DISPLAYING DIFFERENT TYPES OF CAVITATION ACTIVITY ON A DIGITAL IMAGE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647523
IMAGE READING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM FOR READING IMAGE, AND IMAGE READING METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12645410
DOCUMENT PROCESSING DEVICE AND SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 685 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month