Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/822,613

BROADCAST RECEIVING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Sep 03, 2024
Examiner
CHEN, CAI Y
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Maxell, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
570 granted / 789 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
808
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-10 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. [US 12,108,107, hereinafter refers '107]. Regarding claim 1, the claim limitation of the instant claim is same as claim 1 of ‘107, except the claim limitation of “a tuner configured to receive first video data relating to a broadcast program, application acquisition destination information and application expiration information for a predetermined application via a digital television broadcast signal; a network interface configured to communicate with a server via a network and to receive second video data relating to a content stored in the server; a video decoder configured to decode the first video data received by the tuner and/or the second video data received by the network interface; a processor configured to acquire the predetermined application from the network based on the application acquisition destination information received by the tuner via a digital television broadcast signal, execute the acquired predetermined application, and generate an application video based on the executed predetermined application; and a display configured to display a video of the broadcast program based on the first video data decoded by the video decoder, a content video based on the second video data decoded by the video decoder, and/or the application video generated by the processor, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, based on the application expiration information received by the tuner via a digital television broadcast signal, whether the expiration of the predetermined application has expired; acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has not expired; and not acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has expired” which corresponds to claim limitation of “a tuner configured to receive first video data relating to a broadcast program via a digital television broadcast signal: a network interface configured to communicate with a server via a network and to receive second video data relating to a content stored in the server; a video decoder configured to decode the first video data received by the tuner and/or the second video data received by the network interface: a processor configured to acquire a predetermined application from the network based on application acquisition destination information received by the network interface, execute the acquired predetermined application, and generate an application video based on the executed predetermined application; and a display configured to display a video of the broadcast program based on the first video data decoded by the video decoder, a content video based on the second video data decoded by the video decoder, and/or the application video generated by the processor, wherein the network interface is further configured to receive application expiration information for the predetermined application from the network, and wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, based on the application expiration information received by the network interface, whether the expiration of the predetermined application has expired; acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has not expired; and not acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has expired” of claim 1 of ‘107. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claim limitation of claim 1 is met by the claim limitation of claim 1 of ‘107. Regarding claim 2, the claim limitation of the instant claim is same as claim 2 of ‘107, except the claim limitation of “a tuner configured to receive first video data relating to a broadcast program, application acquisition destination information and application expiration information for a predetermined application via a digital television broadcast signal; a network interface configured to communicate with a server via a network and to receive second video data relating to a content stored in the server; a video decoder configured to decode the first video data received by the tuner and/or the second video data received by the network interface; a processor configured to acquire the predetermined application from the network based on the application acquisition destination information received by the tuner via a digital television broadcast signal, execute the acquired predetermined application, and generate an application video based on the executed predetermined application; and a display configured to display a video of the broadcast program based on the first video data decoded by the video decoder, a content video based on the second video data decoded by the video decoder, and/or the application video generated by the processor, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, based on the application expiration information received by the tuner via a digital television broadcast signal, whether the expiration of the predetermined application has expired; acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has not expired; and not acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has expired” which corresponds to claim limitation of “a tuner configured to receive first video data relating to a broadcast program via a digital television broadcast signal: a network interface configured to communicate with a server via a network and to receive second video data relating to a content stored in the server; a video decoder configured to decode the first video data received by the tuner and/or the second video data received by the network interface: a processor configured to acquire a predetermined application from the network based on application acquisition destination information received by the network interface, execute the acquired predetermined application, and generate an application video based on the executed predetermined application; and a display configured to display a video of the broadcast program based on the first video data decoded by the video decoder, a content video based on the second video data decoded by the video decoder, and/or the application video generated by the processor, wherein the network interface is further configured to receive application expiration information for the predetermined application from the network, and wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, based on the application expiration information received by the network interface, whether the expiration of the predetermined application has expired; acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has not expired; and not acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has expired” of claim 2 of ‘107. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claim limitation of claim 2 is met by the claim limitation of claim 2 of ‘107. Regarding claim 3, the claim limitation of claim 3 is same as claim 3 of ‘107. Regarding claim 4, the claim limitation of the instant claim is same as claim 2 of ‘107, except the claim limitation of “a tuner configured to receive first video data relating to a broadcast program, application acquisition destination information and application expiration information for a predetermined application via a digital television broadcast signal; a network interface configured to communicate with a server via a network and to receive second video data relating to a content stored in the server; a video decoder configured to decode the first video data received by the tuner and/or the second video data received by the network interface; a processor configured to acquire the predetermined application from the network based on the application acquisition destination information received by the tuner via a digital television broadcast signal, execute the acquired predetermined application, and generate an application video based on the executed predetermined application; and a display configured to display a video of the broadcast program based on the first video data decoded by the video decoder, a content video based on the second video data decoded by the video decoder, and/or the application video generated by the processor, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, based on the application expiration information received by the tuner via a digital television broadcast signal, whether the expiration of the predetermined application has expired; acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has not expired; and not acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has expired” which corresponds to claim limitation of “a tuner configured to receive first video data relating to a broadcast program via a digital television broadcast signal: a network interface configured to communicate with a server via a network and to receive second video data relating to a content stored in the server; a video decoder configured to decode the first video data received by the tuner and/or the second video data received by the network interface: a processor configured to acquire a predetermined application from the network based on application acquisition destination information received by the network interface, execute the acquired predetermined application, and generate an application video based on the executed predetermined application; and a display configured to display a video of the broadcast program based on the first video data decoded by the video decoder, a content video based on the second video data decoded by the video decoder, and/or the application video generated by the processor, wherein the network interface is further configured to receive application expiration information for the predetermined application from the network, and wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, based on the application expiration information received by the network interface, whether the expiration of the predetermined application has expired; acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has not expired; and not acquire the predetermined application from the network if the processor determines that the expiration of the predetermined application has expired” of claim 4 of ‘107. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claim limitation of claim 4 is met by the claim limitation of claim 4 of ‘107. Regarding claim 5, the claim limitation of claim 5 is same as claim 5 of ‘107. Regarding claim 6, the claim limitation of claim 6 is same as claim 6 of ‘107. Regarding claim 7, the claim limitation of claim 7 is same as claim 7 of ‘107. Regarding claim 8, the claim limitation of claim 8 is same as claim 8 of ‘107. Regarding claim 9, the claim limitation of claim 9 is same as claim 9 of ‘107. Regarding claim 10, the claim limitation of claim 10 is same as claim 10 of ‘107. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAI Y CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5679. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM -4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at 571-272-7527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAI Y CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598349
SIGNATURE RETRIEVAL AND MATCHING FOR MEDIA MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592978
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTICASTING LIVE CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580741
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND SYSTEM, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568258
SEAMLESSLY INSERTING A SUPPLEMENTAL CONTENT ITEM INTO A CONTENT ITEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554882
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNTHETIC IDENTITY DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month