Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/822,702

ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICES AND METHODS FOR RADIO-FREQUENCY APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Sep 03, 2024
Examiner
WONG, ALAN
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Skyworks Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
494 granted / 594 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 23, 40 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 18, 19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,081,188. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the patent ‘188 claims an acoustic wave device, comprising: a quartz substrate including a first surface; a piezoelectric plate formed from LiTaO.sub.3 or LiNbO.sub.3 and including a first surface configured to support a surface acoustic wave and a second surface in direct engagement with the first surface of the quartz substrate, the second surface being a minus surface resulting from crystal structure orientation of the piezoelectric plate; and an interdigital transducer electrode formed on the first surface of the piezoelectric plate and configured to provide transducer functionality associated with the surface acoustic wave; a method for fabricating the acoustic wave device; and a radio frequency filter comprising input and output nodes, acoustic wave device between the input and output nodes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 23, 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Watanabe US 9,431,996. 1. Watanabe discloses an acoustic wave device (Fig. 1A, etc.) comprising: a quartz substrate (2; Col. 7 lines 14-24) including a first (top) surface; a piezoelectric plate formed from LiTaO.sub.3 or LiNbO.sub.3 (5; Col. 9 lines 5-12) and including a first (top) surface configured to support a surface acoustic wave and a second (bottom) surface in engagement with the first surface of the quartz substrate, the second surface being a minus surface resulting from crystal structure orientation of the piezoelectric plate (Col. 9 line 7, the Euler angle of the piezoelectric layer gives the minus bottom surface, see Applicant’s Table 1); and an interdigital transducer electrode (6) formed on the first surface of the piezoelectric plate and configured to provide transducer functionality associated with the surface acoustic wave. 23. Watanabe discloses a method for fabricating (realized by) an acoustic wave device (Fig. 1A, etc.), the method comprising: forming or providing a quartz substrate (2; Col. 7 lines 14-24) having a first (top) surface; forming or providing a piezoelectric plate with LiTaO.sub.3 or LiNbO.sub.3 (5; Col. 9 lines 5-12) to include a first (top) surface configured to support a surface acoustic wave and a second (bottom) surface being a minus surface resulting from crystal structure orientation of the piezoelectric plate (Col. 9 line 7, the Euler angle of the piezoelectric layer gives the minus bottom surface, see Applicant’s Table 1); and coupling the piezoelectric plate with the quartz substrate such that the minus surface of the piezoelectric plate engages the first surface of the quartz substrate (see Fig. 1A). 40. Watanabe discloses a radio-frequency filter (Fig. 1A, etc.; Col. 1 lines 7-8, Col. 9 lines 20-31) comprising: an input node for receiving a signal (inherent to the filter); an output node for providing a filtered signal (inherent to the filter); and an acoustic wave device implemented to be electrically between the input node and the output node to generate the filtered signal (Col. 9 lines 20-31; e.g., ladder filter), the acoustic wave device including a quartz substrate (2; Col. 7 lines 14-24) with a first (top) surface, and a piezoelectric plate formed from LiTaO.sub.3 or LiNbO.sub.3 (5; Col. 9 lines 5-12) and having a first (top) surface configured to support a surface acoustic wave and a second (bottom) surface in engagement with the first surface of the quartz substrate, the second surface being a minus surface resulting from crystal structure orientation of the piezoelectric plate (Col. 9 line 7, the Euler angle of the piezoelectric layer gives the minus bottom surface, see Applicant’s Table 1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN WONG whose telephone number is (571)272-3238. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10am - 7:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.W/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587161
HIGHER ORDER LAMB WAVE ACOUSTIC DEVICES WITH COMPLEMENTARILY-ORIENTED PIEZOELECTRIC LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587171
PASSBAND FILTER COMBINING TWO SETS OF COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12556159
BULK ACOUSTIC WAVE RESONATOR WITH INTEGRATED CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12549154
PACKAGE COMPRISING AN ACOUSTIC DEVICE AND A CAP SUBSTRATE COMPRISING AN INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12542535
ACOUSTIC WAVE FILTER WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESONATORS IN ACOUSTIC FILTER COMPONENT AND/OR MULTIPLEXER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month