Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/822,944

A METHOD TO REFINE THE UE LOCATION FOR 911 CALL ROUTING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 03, 2024
Examiner
DOAN, PHUOC HUU
Art Unit
2646
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
T-Mobile USA Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1049 granted / 1145 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1155
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1145 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by MARTIN ET AL. (US Pub No. 2021/0289334). Claim 1, MARTIN discloses one or more computer-readable media having computer-executable instructions embodied thereon that, when executed, perform a method for refining user equipment (UE) (See Fig.1A) location for wireless emergency location-based call routing, the method comprising: initiating, at the UE, an emergency call (par [0012, 0027, 0036, 0097] in response to receiving the emergency data, from when an emergency call is made from a cell phone, displaying the emergency data on a computing device of the ESP user associated with the automatic alarm, initiating a verification inquiry to one or more emergency contacts during the VoIP call); generating, by a location engine of the UE (Fig. 1A, location components 118), a location comprising a horizontal uncertainty and a confidence level (par [0013, 0021, 0027, 0079, 0080, 0082] a horizontal uncertainty (i.e., accuracy) is used to determine the quality of the location for a fixed confidence level wherein MARTIN discloses during an emergency, the clearinghouse 150 detects the emergency and/or otherwise identifies the need to provide emergency data pertaining to the emergency. The clearinghouse 150 then identifies any emergency data pertaining to the emergency stored within the clearinghouse 150 and transmits the pertinent emergency data to the requesting ESP); comparing the horizontal uncertainty to an uncertainty threshold; based on the comparing, determining if the location can be communicated to a gateway (par [0080-0082, 0094-0096, 0235]); comparing the horizontal uncertainty to an uncertainty threshold; based on the comparing to perform the location can be communicated to a gateway which communication between the UE and a public safety answer point PSAP routing a location, geofence, or asset range to indicate where the emergency response asset is available, for example: the two-way communication session is facilitated through an emergency response application 1960 accessed by the ESP 1930, the two-way communication session is facilitated through both a monitoring center portal 1986 accessed by the monitoring center 1980 and provided by the EMS 1920 and an emergency response application 1960 accessed by the ESP 1930; and See Fig. 7). Claim 2, 9, 16, MARTIN further discloses the media of claim 1, further comprising, determining the horizontal uncertainty is equal to or below the uncertainty threshold (par [0036] the entries in which the source is the electronic device, calculating an average of the verification statuses; comparing the average of the verification statuses to a predefined threshold; and verifying the automatic alarm if the average of the verification statuses meets or exceeds the predefined threshold). Claim 3, 10, 17, MARTIN further discloses the media of claim 2, further comprising communicating the location to the gateway (par [0094-0096, 0235] to perform the location can be communicated to a gateway which communication between the UE and a public safety answer point PSAP routing a location, geofence). Claim 4, 11, 18, MARTIN further discloses the media of claim 3, further comprising initiating communication between the UE and a public safety answer point (PSAP) (par [0079-0081, 0235] an emergency call is made from a cell phone, to perform the location can be communicated to a gateway which communication between the UE and a public safety answer point PSAP). Claim 5, 12, 19, MARTIN further discloses the media of claim 1, further comprising, determining the horizontal uncertainty is above the uncertainty threshold (par [0036] the entries in which the source is the electronic device, calculating an average of the verification statuses; comparing the average of the verification statuses to a predefined threshold; and verifying the automatic alarm if the average of the verification statuses meets or exceeds the predefined threshold). Claim 6, 13, MARTIN further discloses the media of claim 5, further comprising generating, by the location engine of the UE or a second location engine of the UE, a second location comprising a second horizontal uncertainty and a second confidence level (par [0021] which is displaying, for example: the second location associated with the second emergency alert as a second incident location within the interactive map and receiving second emergency data associated with a second emergency alert from a second monitoring center, wherein the second emergency data comprises a second location associated with the second emergency alert; b) determining that the second location associated with the second emergency alert is within the geofence associated with the first ESP). Claim 7, 14, 20, MARTIN further discloses the media of claim 6, wherein the location engine and the second location engine utilize one or more of: global navigation satellite system, device-based hybrid, Wi-Fi Location provider, Network-Location provider to determine the location or the second location (par [0070-0071] disclosed available of a mobile communication devices to generate accurate locations by incorporating multiple technologies embedded in the devices, such as GPS, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth to create device-based hybrid locations. Device-based hybrid locations are locations calculated on an electronic or communication device, as opposed to locations calculated using a network (e.g., a carrier network). Device-based hybrid locations can be generated using GPS, network-based technologies, Wi-Fi access points, Bluetooth beacons, barometric pressure sensors, dead reckoning using accelerometers and gyro-meters, and which device operating systems providers are running to enhance location technology). Claim 8, the claim is rejected the same reasons as set forth in claim 1. Claim 15, MARTIN discloses a system for refining use equipment (UE) (See Fig.1A) location for wireless emergency location-based call routing, the system comprising: a node configured to wirelessly communicate with one or more UEs (par [0071, 0074, 0078, 0097, 0235] the clearinghouse 150 facilitates multiple communications within a wide variety of networks and protocol types, including wired networks, for example, LAN, cable, etc., and wireless networks, such as WLAN, cellular, or satellite to receiving the emergency data, from when an emergency call is made from a cell phone to perform the location can be communicated to a gateway which communication between the UE and a public safety answer point PSAP routing a location, geofence, or asset range to indicate where the emergency response asset is available ); and a UE of the one or more UEs that: (1) initiates, at the UE, an emergency call (par [0012, 0027, 0036, 0097] in response to receiving the emergency data, from when an emergency call is made from a cell phone, displaying the emergency data on a computing device of the ESP user associated with the automatic alarm, initiating a verification inquiry to one or more emergency contacts during the VoIP call; (2) generates, by a location engine of the UE (Fig. 1A, location components 118), a location comprising a horizontal uncertainty and a confidence level (par [0013, 0021, 0027, 0079, 0080, 0082] a horizontal uncertainty (i.e., accuracy) is used to determine the quality of the location for a fixed confidence level wherein MARTIN discloses during an emergency, the clearinghouse 150 detects the emergency and/or otherwise identifies the need to provide emergency data pertaining to the emergency. The clearinghouse 150 then identifies any emergency data pertaining to the emergency stored within the clearinghouse 150 and transmits the pertinent emergency data to the requesting ESP); (3) compares the horizontal uncertainty to an uncertainty threshold; (4) based on the comparing, determines if the location can be communicated to a gateway (par [0080-0082, 0094-0096, 0235]); comparing the horizontal uncertainty to an uncertainty threshold; based on the comparing to perform the location can be communicated to a gateway which communication between the UE and a public safety answer point PSAP routing a location, geofence, or asset range to indicate where the emergency response asset is available, for example: the two-way communication session is facilitated through an emergency response application 1960 accessed by the ESP 1930, the two-way communication session is facilitated through both a monitoring center portal 1986 accessed by the monitoring center 1980 and provided by the EMS 1920 and an emergency response application 1960 accessed by the ESP 1930; and See Fig. 7). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ray (US Pub No. 2012/0309340) discloses system and method for communicating emergency information through messaging. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUOC HUU DOAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7920. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00AM - 4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JEANETTE PARKER can be reached at 571-270-3647. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUOC H DOAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750119
PROACTIVE BEAM REPORT TRANSMISSION FOR BEAM FAILURE RECOVERY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745212
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR SIDELINK POSITIONING
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745264
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733023
INTER-UE COORDINATION INFORMATION-BASED RESOURCE ALLOCATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12713209
GROUP USER COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, NETWORK DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month