Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/823,499

HOOD FOR MEMS-BASED COOLING SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 03, 2024
Priority
Sep 17, 2020 — provisional 63/079,926 +3 more
Examiner
TAVAKOLDAVANI, KAMRAN
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Frore Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
361 granted / 437 resolved
+12.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
484
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 437 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 8-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen (EP 3327295 A1). Claim 1: Chen discloses a system (FIG.4A/4B is exploded view of air pump 22 in FIG.2B, as all components are stacked together on each other, after components are combined together, the cross sectional view of resulting structure of the air pump 22 is shown in FIG.6), comprising: a tile (plate 2241 used as tile; based on broadest reasonable interpretation, since all components of structure 22 are stacked together therefore components are connected to each other one way or another) including a plurality of cooling cells (channels 221b used as cooling cells), each of the plurality of cooling cells (221b) including a support structure (2242) and a cooling element (223 used as cooling element) (based on broadest reasonable interpretation, since all components of structure 22 are stacked together therefore components are connected to each other one way or another), the cooling element (223) being supported by the support structure (2242), the cooling element (223) being configured to undergo vibrational motion when actuated to drive a fluid (plate 222 vibrates along vertical direction in reciprocating manner, therefore causing components like 223 undergo vibration motion) toward a heat-generating structure (paragraph [7]: electric component 3 used as heat generating structure) (based on broadest reasonable interpretation, since all components of structure 22 are stacked together therefore components are connected to each other one way or another); and a hood (plate 222) coupled to the tile and directing the fluid around the plurality of cooling cells (channels 221b), wherein each of the plurality of cooling cells has a vent (vent is inherent in order for fluid flows through channels) for admitting the fluid opposite to the heat-generating structure (functional language), and wherein the hood (222) includes: a cover plate (plate 221 used as cover plate) including at least one fluid inlet (221a) therein, where the tile (2241) is between the cover plate (221) and the heat-generating structure (electronic component 3 is located at lower section of structure 22 above plate 2242 and surface of electronic component attached to conducting plate 225); and a frame (2232) surrounding a portion (inherent) of the plurality of cooling cells (221b) such that a fluid channel (chamber 220 is fluid channel formed between 221b and 221 and 2232 shown in FIG.2B which the cross sectional view of resulting structure is shown in FIG.6) is formed between the plurality of cooling cells (221b), the cover plate (221), and the frame (2232). PNG media_image1.png 688 635 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 231 780 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim 2: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the hood (222) includes the heat-generating structure (electric component 3) coupled to the tile (2241), the heat-generating structure (electric component 3) being a heat spreader (3), a fluid channel being formed between the heat spreader (3) and the tile (2241) (to clarify, chamber 200/201 together formed fluid channel between 2241 and 3 shown in FIG.2B which the cross sectional view of resulting structure is shown in FIG.6). Claim 3: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the hood (222) includes fencing (movable part 222a used as fencing; plate 222 comprises movable part 222a, convergence chamber for converging air defined by movable part 222a of plate 222 and gas inlet plate 211 collaboratively) that guides the fluid from the plurality of cooling cells (221b) in the fluid channel (chamber 200/201 together formed fluid channel between 2241 and 3) along the heat spreader (electric component 3). Claim 4: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the fencing (222a) is integrated with the heat spreader (electric component 3). Claim 5: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the heat spreader (electric component 3) includes a pedestal (annotated FIG.2B), the tile (2241) being coupled to the heat spreader (3) at the pedestal (annotated FIG.2B). Claim 8: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the hood (i.e., 222) further incudes: a lower frame (2232) between the heat spreader (electronic component located at lower section of air pump 22) (FIG.4A is exploded view of air pump 22 in FIG.2B, the cross sectional view of resulting structure of the air pump 22 is shown in FIG.6) and the plurality of cooling cells (221b). Claim 9: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the frame (2232) is integrated into the cover plate (221). Claim 10: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: an electrical connector (conducting pin 2232c used as electrical connector is protruding outward from frame 2232 to be electrically connected with an external circuit) coupled to the plurality of cooling cells (221b), the hood (222) having an aperture therein (as shown in FIG.6 222 has central aperture 2220), the electrical connector (2232c) passing through the aperture (as shown in FIG.6 222 has central aperture 2220). Claim 11: Chen discloses a method, comprising: providing a tile (plate 2241 used as tile; based on broadest reasonable interpretation, since all components of structure 22 are stacked together therefore components are connected to each other one way or another) including a plurality of cooling cells (221b), each of the plurality of cooling cells (221b) including a support structure (2242) and a cooling element (223 used as cooling element) (based on broadest reasonable interpretation, since all components of structure 22 are stacked together therefore components are connected to each other one way or another), the cooling element being supported by the support structure (2242), the cooling element (223) being configured to undergo vibrational motion when actuated to drive a fluid (plate 222 vibrates along vertical direction in reciprocating manner, therefore causing components like 223 undergo vibration motion) toward a heat-generating structure (paragraph [7]: electric component 3 used as heat generating structure) (based on broadest reasonable interpretation, since all components of structure 22 are stacked together therefore components are connected to each other one way or another); and providing a hood (plate 222) configured to direct the fluid around the plurality of cooling cells (channels 221b), wherein each of the plurality of cooling cells has a vent (vent is inherent in order for fluid flows through channels) for admitting the fluid opposite to the heat-generating structure (functional language), and wherein the hood (222) includes: a cover plate a cover plate (plate 221 used as cover plate) including at least one fluid inlet (221a) therein, where the tile (2241) is between the cover plate (221) and the heat-generating structure (electronic component 3 is located at lower section of structure 22 above plate 2242 and surface of electronic component attached to conducting plate 225); and a frame (2232) surrounding a portion (inherent) of the plurality of cooling cells (221b) such that a fluid channel (chamber 220 is fluid channel formed between 221b and 221 and 2232 shown in FIG.2B which the cross sectional view of resulting structure is shown in FIG.6) is formed between the plurality of cooling cells (221b), the cover plate (221), and the frame (2232). Claim 12: Chen discloses the method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the hood (222) includes the heat-generating structure (electronic component 3 is located at lower section of structure 22 above plate 2242 and surface of electronic component attached to conducting plate 225) coupled to the tile (2241), the heat-generating structure being a heat spreader (electronic component 3), the providing the hood further including: providing fencing (movable part 222a used as fencing; plate 222 comprises movable part 222a, convergence chamber for converging air defined by movable part 222a of plate 222 and gas inlet plate 211 collaboratively), the fluid channel (chamber 220 is fluid channel formed between 221b and 221 and 2232) being formed between the heat spreader (3) and the tile (2241), the fencing (222a used as fencing) guiding the fluid from the plurality of cooling cells (221b) in the fluid channel (chamber 220 is fluid channel formed between 221b and 221 and 2232 shown in FIG.2B which the cross sectional view of resulting structure) along the heat spreader (3). Claim 13: Chen discloses the method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the fencing (222a) is integrated with the heat spreader (3). Claim 14: Chen discloses the method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the heat spreader (3) includes a pedestal (annotated FIG.2B), further including: coupling the tile (2241) to the heat spreader (3) at the pedestal (annotated FIG.2B). Claim 15: Chen discloses the method as claimed in claim 11, further comprising: providing an electrical connector (conducting pin 2232c used as electrical connector is protruding outward from frame 2232 to be electrically connected with an external circuit) coupled to the plurality of cooling cells (221b), the hood (222) having an aperture (as shown in FIG.6 222 has central aperture 2220) therein, the aperture (central aperture 2220) admitting the electrical connector ( 2232c). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 6, 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (EP 3327295 A1). Claim 6: Chen discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 2, except for an additional tile including an additional plurality of cooling cells, each of the additional plurality of cooling cells including an additional support structure and an additional cooling element, the additional cooling element being supported by the additional support structure, the additional cooling element being configured to undergo the vibrational motion when actuated to drive the fluid toward the heat spreader; and the additional tile. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the apparatus of Chen to include an additional tile including an additional plurality of cooling cells, each of the additional plurality of cooling cells including an additional support structure and an additional cooling element, the additional cooling element being supported by the additional support structure, the additional cooling element being configured to undergo the vibrational motion when actuated to drive the fluid toward the heat spreader; and where the additional tile in order to enhance cooling the electronic component by transferring additional heat from the electronic component, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a known device involves only routine skill in the art (Duplication of parts: MPEP 2144.04 VI-B). Claim 7: Chen as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 6, except for, wherein the heat spreader includes a wall between the tile and the additional tile. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to further modify the apparatus of Chen to include the additional tile in order to enhance cooling the electronic component by transferring additional heat, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a known device involves only routine skill in the art (Duplication of parts: MPEP 2144.04 VI-B). Further, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to further modify the apparatus of Chen to include the heat spreader includes a wall between the tile and the additional tile in order to enhance cooling the electronic component by transferring additional heat from the electronic component, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art (Location of parts: MPEP 2144.04 VI-C). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure which is relevant to electronic device package: Balakrishnan (2019/0206839 A1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAMRAN TAVAKOLDAVANI whose telephone number is (313)446-6612. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00 am to 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached on (571) 272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAMRAN TAVAKOLDAVANI/ Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /LEN TRAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631131
ONCE-THROUGH HEAT EXCHANGER AND HEAT RECOVERY STEAM GENERATOR INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624904
HEAT EXCHANGER AND REFRIGERATION CYCLE APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624902
MODULAR THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE AND TRANSFER IN A PCM HOSTING SYSTEM
11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618595
THREE-DIMENSIONALLY DISTRIBUTED LIQUID ATOMIZATION HEAT EXCHANGER, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, REFRIGERATION SYSTEM, AND AIR CONDITIONER
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12578121
Heat Exchanger
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month