Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/823,727

METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT§Other
Filed
Sep 04, 2024
Priority
Dec 31, 2020 — CN 202011638559.9 +1 more
Examiner
SAMPAT, RUSHIL PARIMAL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apogee Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
324 granted / 365 resolved
+28.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.9%
+18.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 365 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim(s) 1-20 are presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority As required by M.P.E.P.201.14(c), acknowledgement is made to applicant’s claim for priority based on application(s) CN202011638559.9 submitted on December 31st, 2020. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Should applicant desire to obtain the benefit of foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) prior to declaration of an interference, a certified English translation of the foreign application must be submitted in reply to this action. 37 CFR 41.154(b) and 41.202(e). Failure to provide a certified translation may result in no benefit being accorded for the non-English application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on November 7th, 2024 follow the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: [0001] This application is the continuation of the United States patent application No.17/560,299, filed on December 23,2021, now issued as Patent (US 12,120,645 B2) which claims the priority benefit of Chinese Patent Application No.202011638559.9, filed on December 31,2020, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Appropriate correction is required. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed (i.e. CONDITIONAL HANDOVER (CHO) PROCEDURE IN NON-TERRESTIAL WIRELESS NETWORKS (NTN)”. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it contains a legal phraseology “comprises” and/or “comprising” in line 3 and line 8. The form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as "means" and "said," should be avoided. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over Claim(s) 1-19 of Yu et al. (US 12,120,645 B2) hereinafter “Yu”. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant application merely broadens the scope of the issued Patent by eliminating the elements and their functions of the claims. Note that the applicant’s filing of the continuing or instant application is voluntary and not the direct, unmodified result of a restriction requirement under 35 U.S.C. 121 (i.e. without a restriction requirement by the examiner) and the claims of the continuing or instant application are drawn to the “same invention” as the issued Patent. Regarding Claims 1, 16 and 20 although the conflicting claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because Claims 1, 16 and 20 of the instant application merely broaden the scope of Claims 1, 15 and 17 of the issued Patent by eliminating the elements and their functions of the claims as set forth below: (Instant application: 18/823,727) Yu et al. (US 12,120,645 B2) Regarding Claim 1, A first node for wireless communications, comprising: a first receiver, receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set, wherein the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information are used for Conditional Reconfiguration, the Conditional Reconfiguration comprises Conditional Handover (CHO), or the Conditional Reconfiguration comprises Conditional PSCell Change (CPC); and a first transmitter, in instances when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled, applying the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information, and transmitting a first message; the first receiver, in instances when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmitting the first message, maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprising second configuration sub-information; wherein the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell, while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message; the action of maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information comprises: maintaining the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information stored in VarConditionalReconfig or VarConditionalReconfiguration; the maintaining includes not removing; the meaning includes removing. Regarding Claim 1, A first node for wireless communications, comprising: a first receiver, receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set; and a first transmitter, in instances when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled, applying the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information, and transmitting a first message; the first receiver, in instances when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmitting the first message, maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprising second configuration sub-information; the first receiver, receiving third configuration sub-information; as a response to the action of receiving the third configuration sub-information, releasing the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information; wherein the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell, while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message; the third configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set, and the third configuration sub-information is different from any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, the third configuration sub-information being associated with a third cell. Regarding Claim 16, A second node for wireless communications, comprising: a second transmitter, transmitting multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set, wherein the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information are used for Conditional Reconfiguration, the Conditional Reconfiguration comprises Conditional Handover (CHO), or the Conditional Reconfiguration comprises Conditional PSCell Change (CPC); wherein when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled, the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information is applied and a first message is transmitted; when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmission of the first message, a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information is maintained and the first configuration sub-information is released, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprises second configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell, while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message; the action of maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information comprises: maintaining the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information stored in VarConditionalReconfig or VarConditionalReconfiguration; the maintaining includes not removing; the meaning includes removing. Regarding Claim 15, A second node for wireless communications, comprising: a second transmitter, transmitting multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set; the second transmitter, transmitting third configuration sub-information; wherein when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled, the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information is applied and a first message is transmitted; when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmission of the first message, a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information is maintained, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprises second configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell, while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message; as a response to the third configuration sub-information is received, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information is released; the third configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set, and the third configuration sub-information is different from any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, the third configuration sub-information being associated with a third cell. Regarding Claim 20, A method in a first node for wireless communications, comprising: receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set, wherein the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information are used for Conditional Reconfiguration, the Conditional Reconfiguration comprises Conditional Handover (CHO), or the Conditional Reconfiguration comprises Conditional PSCell Change (CPC); and in instances when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled, applying the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information, and transmitting a first message; in instances when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmitting the first message, maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information and releasing the first configuration sub-information, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprising second configuration sub-information; wherein the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell, while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message; the action of maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information comprises: maintaining the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information stored in VarConditionalReconfig or VarConditionalReconfiguration; the maintaining includes not removing; the meaning includes removing. Regarding Claim 17, A method in a first node for wireless communications, comprising: receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set; and in instances when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled, applying the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information, and transmitting a first message; in instances when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmitting the first message, maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprising second configuration sub-information; receiving third configuration sub-information; as a response to the action of receiving the third configuration sub-information, releasing the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information; wherein the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell, while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message; the third configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set, and the third configuration sub-information is different from any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information, the third configuration sub-information being associated with a third cell. In view of the above, it is clear that the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because Claims 1, 16 and 20 of the instant application merely broaden the scope of Claims 1, 15 and 17 of the issued Patent by eliminating the italicized portion(s) of the claim limitations. It has been held that the omission an element and its function is an obvious expedient if the remaining elements perform the same function as before. In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184 (CCPA). Also note Ex parte Rainu, 168 USPQ 375 (Bd.App.1969); omission of a reference element whose function is not needed would be obvious to one skilled in the art. Moreover, the doctrine of double patenting seeks to prevent the unjustified extension of Patent exclusivity beyond the term of a Patent. Claim(s) 2-15 and 17-19 are also rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting for being dependent on a rejected base claim as set forth above. Note that the applicant filing of the continuing application is voluntary and not the direct, unmodified result of restriction requirement under 35 U.S.C. 121 (i.e. without a restriction requirement by the examiner) and the claims of the second(instant) application are drawn to the “same invention” as the first application or patent. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 1-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: (i) Independent claims 1, 16 and 20 are allowable over prior art since none of the prior art taken individually or in combination particularly discloses, fairly suggests, or renders obvious the following italic limitations: In claims 1, 16 and 20 … “the action of maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information comprises: maintaining the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information stored in VarConditionalReconfig or VarConditionalReconfiguration; the maintaining includes not removing; the meaning includes removing …” … in combination with other limitations recited as specified in claims 1, 16 and 20. Note that the first closest prior art SHI et al. (US 2022/0225191 A1) hereinafter “Shi” discloses a first node for wireless communications [see fig. 1, pg. 5. ¶153 lines 3-20, a network device or user equipment (UE) “10”], comprising: a first receiver [see fig. 1, pg. 5. ¶153 lines 3-20, a communication unit or transceiver “120”], receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information [see fig. 3: Step “350”, pg. 6. ¶166 lines 1-5, receiving, a RRC message with a conditional handover (CHO) configuration from a source cell], of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set [see fig. 3: Step “350”, pg. 6. ¶166 lines 1-5, the CHO configuration includes configuration information of the target cell and at least one corresponding CHO execution condition of the target cell]; and a first transmitter [see fig. 1, pg. 5. ¶153 lines 3-20, a communication unit or transceiver “120”], in instances when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled [see fig. 3: Step “360”, pg. 6. ¶167 lines 1-7, when the at least one CHO execution condition is fulfilled], applying the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information [see fig. 3: Step “360”, pg. 6. ¶167 lines 1-7, applying the corresponding configuration information received in the step “350”], and transmitting a first message [see fig. 3: Step(s) “360” / “370”, pg. 6. ¶167 lines 1-7; ¶168 line 1, and perform a handover to the target cell for accessing the target cell]. However, Shi fails to disclose or render obvious the above italic limitations as claimed. Note that the second closest prior art Da Silva et al. (US 2022/0408325 A1) hereinafter “Da Silva” discloses receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information [see fig. 2B: Step “250”, pg. 6. ¶85 lines 1-9, receiving, from a master node “12A” for multi-connectivity operation, a configuration message “20” which includes a master configuration “28” and one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22”], of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set [see fig. 2B: Step “250”, pg. 6. ¶85 lines 9-19, the configuration message “20” for example, include a master configuration “28” and a conditional reconfiguration (e.g., RRCReconfiguration) that includes the one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22”]; and in instances when the execution condition in first configuration sub-information is fulfilled [see fig. 2B: Step “250”, pg. 6. ¶85 lines 9-19, when an associated condition is fulfilled], applying the configuration set in the first configuration sub-information [see fig. 2B: Step “250”, pg. 6. ¶85 lines 9-19, the wireless device “18” is to apply each conditional PSCell configuration “22” comprising a PSCell configuration], and transmitting a first message [see fig. 2B: Step “260”, pg. 6. ¶86 lines 1-6, and transmit a first message “26” in response to the configuration message “20”]; in instances when a first condition set is fulfilled after transmitting the first message [see fig. 2B: Step “265”, pgs. 6-7, ¶87 lines 1-9; ¶88 lines 1-10, after transmitting the first message “26”, when the condition for applying the PSCell configuration of at least one of the one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22” is fulfilled], maintaining a subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information [see fig. 2B: Step “265”, pgs. 6-7, ¶87 lines 1-9; ¶88 lines 1-10, applying the PSCell configuration of at least one of the one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22”], the subset of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information at least comprising second configuration sub-information [see fig. 2B: Step “265”, pgs. 6-7, ¶87 lines 1-9; ¶88 lines 1-10, the indication “24” included in the second message “30” indicates that the wireless device “18” has applied the PSCell configuration of at least one of the one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22”]; wherein the first configuration sub-information is any of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information [see pg. 6. ¶85 lines 13-19, the configuration message “20” is, for example, include a master configuration “28” and a conditional reconfiguration (e.g., RRCReconfiguration) that includes the one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22”], and the second configuration sub-information is one of the multiple pieces of configuration sub-information other than the first configuration sub-information [see pg. 6. ¶85 lines 13-19, each conditional PSCell configuration “22” comprises a PSCell configuration that the wireless device “18” is to apply when an associated condition is fulfilled]; the first configuration sub-information is associated with a first cell [see pg. 6, ¶85 lines 1-19, the configuration message “20” includes a master configuration “28” and one or more conditional PSCell configurations “22”], while the second configuration sub-information is associated with a second cell [see pg. 6, ¶85 lines 1-19, each PSCell configuration is a configuration of a primary cell of a secondary cell group (PSCell) associated with a secondary node (e.g., node “12B”) for multi-connectivity operation]; the first message is used to indicate completion of a radio link control reconfiguration [see pg. 6, ¶85 lines 1-4, the first message is a first Radio Resource Control, RRC, Reconfiguration Complete message or a first RRC Connection Reconfiguration Complete message]; a condition in the first condition set comprises transmitting the first message [see pg. 7, ¶89 lines 4-14, the first message is transmitted based on identifying that the configuration message includes the master configuration and based on evaluating that the condition has not been fulfilled for any of the one or more conditional PSCell configurations]. However, Da Silva fails to disclose or render obvious the above italic limitations as claimed. Note that the third closest prior art CHEN et al. (US 2019/0349938 A1) discloses a first node for wireless communications [see fig. 3: Step “S130”, pg. 7, ¶97 lines 1-3, a terminal device], comprising: receiving multiple pieces of configuration sub-information [see fig. 3: Step “S130”, pg. 7, ¶97 lines 1-3, receiving the at least two pieces of target sub-configuration information sent by the network side device], of which each piece of configuration sub-information comprises one execution condition and one configuration set [see fig. 3: Step “S140”, pg. 7, ¶98 lines 1-4, the terminal device determines, according to the co-location rule, that the at least two target signals corresponding to the at least two pieces of target sub-configuration information are quasi co-located]. However, Chen fails to disclose or render obvious the above italic limitations as claimed. Thus, Shi, Da Silva and Chen taken individually or in-combination fails to particularly disclose, fairly suggest, or render obvious the above italic limitations as claimed. Claim(s) 2-15 and 17-19 are also allowed for being dependent on an allowable base claim as set forth above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. United States Patent Publication Document: Park et al. (US 2022/0255591 A1); see fig. 28, pgs. 35-37, ¶374-¶384. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RUSHIL P SAMPAT whose telephone number is (469) 295-9141. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri (8 AM - 5 PM). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian Moore can be reached on (571) 272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RUSHIL P. SAMPAT/Primary Examiner- TC 2400, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 04, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750729
DATA COMPRESSION AND CHANNEL CODING TECHNIQUES FOR VARIABLE LENGTH PAYLOADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745312
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIGNALING TCI STATES
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745199
TECHNIQUES FOR ON-DEMAND SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL BLOCK CONFIGURATION AND TRIGGER FOR SECONDARY CELL ACTIVATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739882
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING PHYSICAL SIDELINK SHARED CHANNEL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND DEVICE FOR SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732318
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REMOVING E2 INTERFACE-RELEVANT INFORMATION IN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.9%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 365 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month