Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/823,972

HOSTING E-COMMERCE BASED ON CLOUD COMPUTING

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Sep 04, 2024
Priority
Apr 04, 2011 — provisional 61/471,666 +1 more
Examiner
IMMANUEL, ILSE I
Art Unit
3699
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Blackhawk Engagement Solutions (De) Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
26%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
53%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 26% of cases
26%
Career Allowance Rate
82 granted / 311 resolved
-25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
353
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 311 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgements This office action is in response to the claims filed 04/03/2026. Claims 1-6 and 14-20 are withdrawn. Claims 12 and 13 are cancelled. Claims 7-11 are pending. Claims 7-11 have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 04/03/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. 112 Due to Applicant’s amendments, prior 112 rejections are withdrawn. Double Patenting There is no allowable subject matter in the present claims, as previously pointed out, the current claims are significantly broader than the patent 12106274, the exact terms, limitations and subject matter are fully encompassed and anticipated in the Patent, “If it is determined that the same invention is being claimed twice, precludes the grant of the second patent regardless of the presence or absence of a terminal disclaimer. Id” MPEP 804.II. The application is not in condition for allowance. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12106274 (“Patent Document”). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Claim 1 of the Patent Document recites all the limitations of claim 1 of the instant application; however, claim 1 of the Patent Document differs since it further recites additional claim limitations. Instant Application Patent Document - 12106274 An electronic commerce system, comprising: a third party provided cloud computing service using dynamically scalable resources associated with a first Internet address domain, wherein the third party provided cloud computing service using dynamically scalable resources provide product information, via a product information application; a secure payment system comprising a plurality of transaction servers associated with the first Internet address domain, An electronic commerce system, comprising: a third party provided cloud computing service using dynamically scalable resources associated with a first Internet address domain, wherein the third party provided cloud computing service using dynamically scalable resources provides product information, via a product information application; a secure payment system comprising a plurality of transaction servers associated with the first Internet address domain; the plurality of transaction servers of the secure payment system configured to execute a payment application and a payment transaction action, wherein the payment transaction action includes receiving payment information, requesting product information, receiving product information, sending a secured payment transaction, or combinations thereof, wherein the payment transaction is held until a minimum number of purchases have been committed, the plurality of transaction servers of the secure payment system executes a payment application and a payment transaction action, wherein the payment transaction action includes receiving payment information, requesting product information, receiving product information, and sending a secured payment transaction, wherein the payment transaction is held until a minimum number of purchases have been committed; wherein the cloud computing service establishes a first electronic commerce session, and the cloud computing service: establishes a first electronic commerce session; and provides a web page content and a first session cookie identifying the first electronic commerce session to a browser executing on a computer in a second Internet address domain different from the first Internet address domain, provides a web page content and a first session cookie identifying the first electronic commerce session to a browser executing on a computer in a second Internet address domain different from the first Internet address domain; wherein the secure payment system sends a request for product information associated with the first electronic commerce session to the third party provided cloud computing service, the secure payment system: receives payment information and the first session cookie from the browser, via a virtual private network (VPN) connection established between the browser and the plurality of transaction servers of the secure payment system; sends a request for product information associated with the first electronic commerce session to the third party provided cloud computing service; wherein the secure payment system receives product information associated with the first electronic commerce session from the third party provided cloud computing service and receives product information associated with the first electronic commerce session from the third party provided cloud computing service; and sends the secured payment transaction to a payment service based on the payment information and based on the product information associated with the first electronic commerce session, wherein the request comprises the first session cookie. sends the secured payment transaction to a payment service based on the payment information and based on the product information associated with the first electronic commerce session, wherein the request comprises the first session cookie. Claim 1 of the patent document contains the additional elements of “the secure payment system: receives payment information and the first session cookie from the browser, via a virtual private network (VPN) connection established between the browser and the plurality of transaction servers of the secure payment system.” The claims in the instant application are anticipated by the Patent Document. The claims are directed to the same subject matter, perform the same method steps and a person of ordinary skill in the art would not be free to practice one of the claimed inventions without infringing upon the other inventions. The instant application claims are generic to the limitations in the Patent Document. Each limitation in the instant application is fully encompassed in the Patent Document claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gallagher (US 7, 861, 077) teaches dynamics of a commerce system. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ILSE I IMMANUEL whose telephone number is (469)295-9094. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NEHA H PATEL can be reached on (571) 270-1492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ILSE I IMMANUEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699999
PSEUDONYMOUS PERSONA CODE-BASED AGE VERIFICATION TOKEN GENERATION
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12670237
DYNAMIC REALLOCATION OF COMPUTING RESOURCES BASED ON MONITORED USAGE ACTIVITIES OF CLIENT SYSTEMS
8y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12670493
PRIVACY PRESERVING ASSET TRANSFER BETWEEN NETWORKS
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12651254
MULTI-TOKEN PROVISIONING, ONLINE PURCHASE TRANSACTION PROCESSING, AND CARD LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646057
Communications Device, Point Of Sale Device, Payment Device and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
26%
Grant Probability
53%
With Interview (+26.5%)
4y 3m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 311 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month