Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/824,187

ACCOMODATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ACCOMODATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 04, 2024
Examiner
ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE
Art Unit
3628
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
5y 1m
To Grant
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allow Rate
221 granted / 566 resolved
-13.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
608
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 566 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Due to communications filed 12/18/25, the following is a final office action. Claims 1, 6-7 are amended. Claims 1-7 are pending in this application and are rejected as follows. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SAKON (JP 2017182326 A), and further in view of PAN, et al (CN 109829370 A). As per claim 1, SAKON discloses: at least one memory storing one or more instructions; and at least one processor configured to execute the one or more instructions to, (The present invention relates to a qualification authentication system using a mobile terminal, a qualification authentication tool (apparatus), and a qualification authentication method, obtain a face image of a user using a facility); [Obvious with a mobile terminal, which is merely a computer, where a computer needs a memory with instructions and processor in order to be able to process any type of information]; identify the user through face authentication using a face image of the user and an image stored in advance; obtain a pre-registration information of the identified user; perform a check-in process for the facility based on the pre-registered information, (Sakon: “(Pre-registration process) Three specific examples will be described with reference to FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B as a pre-registration procedure when authenticating a person to be authenticated with a mobile terminal.” In FIG. 5A, a purchaser who has purchased a credential such as a ticket takes a picture of his / her face at the time of purchase (or after purchase) (S1), and this face information and ticket information (ticket number, The registration is completed by transferring the purchase store information and the purchase date) to the designated server (S2). The face may be photographed using a camera installed at a purchase place or using a smartphone owned by the purchaser. At this time, personal information such as the name, date of birth, and age of the purchaser (that is, the qualification holder) and biometric information such as a signature and voiceprint (here, the autograph is regarded as a part of the biometric information) You can also register at the same time. When such registration is completed, the registered face owner is stored in the server as a valid qualification holder. For example, when a ticket is purchased for gifts, a registration number or a server address may be separately acquired as important information (S4) and registered with the user himself / herself (S5).); register the face image as a face image of a user who is allowed to use the facility, when the user is determined to be allowed to use the facility, (Therefore, as an authentication method that does not require a password, for example, as described in Patent Document 1, a specialized authentication organization is installed, and a face photograph of the person registered in advance in the portable terminal of the store from this authentication organization is obtained; The present invention functions effectively in an implementation environment as shown in FIG. FIG. 1 assumes a situation in which a facility user uses a facility in a facility that can be used only by a person having a predetermined ticket; The transmitted face information and ticket number (qualification) are stored as qualification holder information in the registration database (registration DB) of the server device. Thus, the ticket purchaser (facility user) is registered in the server device 7 as the qualified user 1.); obtain a face image of a user in the facility, (More specifically, in order for the user 1 to apply for the use of the facility, the point standing in front of the staff is the actual authentication place. At that point, the clerk shoots the face of the user 1 with the mobile terminal 13 and authenticate whether or not the user 1 in front of the user has a legitimate qualification to use the ticket. Note that this authentication is not authentication of whether or not the user who has the ticket is the person himself / herself, but whether or not the user who has applied for the ticket has a valid use qualification for the ticket provided at the ticket store 11); permit the user to use the facility by matching the face image of the user obtained in the facility with the face image of the user who is allowed to use the facility, (SAKON (JP 2017182326 A): SOLUTION: "...and a collation unit that implements processing of collating the face information transmitted from the register DB server with the shot face image within the terminal. As a result of the collation processing in the collation unit, when the face information and the face image coincide with each other and the information about the qualification is judged valid, the authenticated person is authenticated to be the legitimate proprietary of the qualification, and a right to be granted by the qualification is given to the authenticated person"; ALSO SEE: (Application to unattended authentication): "The tool main body of FIG. 13 is installed at the entrance of the restricted area. The user wears the mobile terminal 13 on this tool (S32), and photographs his / her face with the camera 15 of the terminal (S33). In addition, when confirmation of the user is required at the time of use, such as signing the signature information input unit 33 of the tool main body 30, speaking a predetermined word, touching the fingerprint sensor, etc. Confirmation information is input (S34). After that, the authentication tool collates the captured face image and the input confirmation information with the registered face information and confirmation information (S35), and if they match, the door is unlocked); SAKON does not disclose the following, however, PAN discloses: perform the check-in process for an unidentified user who cannot be identified by the face authentication, using a reservation number or a reservation code, and output information for confirming whether face image registration is possible for the unidentified user performed the check-in process; and register the face image of the unidentified user as the face image of the user performed the check-in process when the unidentified user responds that the face image is acceptable for registration. However, PAN, et al (CN 109829370 A) discloses in claim 3 of PAN et al: "the mentioned one kind of based on immigrants consultative service platform login system, wherein the face recognition by the face image comparison module for comparing the portrait information is not passed, the secondary verification module will send out prompting, prompting the user to input password using the password login module to perform password login authentication when the secondary verification fails, the user can login to verify code through the reserved phone number."; ALSO SEE "the human face image collecting module collects the human face information will be sent to will be sent in to face image analyzing module, the human face image analysis module for analyzing the received human face image, and analyzing the data in the human face image comparing module to compare; i.e. directly jumps to the information inquiring module"; "SS4: when M I is greater than the preset value, judging that the comparison is not passed, entering the secondary verification mode; SS5: when M I is less than the predetermined value M=0, that is to say, judging the comparison is passed, it will directly jump to the information inquiring module." It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to include the above limitations as taught by PAN, et al in the systems of XU ET AL, since the claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. As per claim 2, SAKON discloses: wherein the at least one processor is further configured to assign and register a services available in the facility to the user who is determined to be allowed to use the facility, (More specifically, in order for the user 1 to apply for the use of the facility, the point standing in front of the staff is the actual authentication place. At that point, the clerk shoots the face of the user 1 with the mobile terminal 13 and authenticates whether or not the user 1 in front of the user has a legitimate qualification to use the ticket. Note that this authentication is not authentication of whether or not the user who has the ticket is the person himself / herself, but whether or not the user who has applied for the ticket has a valid use qualification for the ticket provided at the ticket store 11); As per claim 6, this claim recites limitations similar to those of independent claim 1, and is rejected for similar reasons. As per claim 7, this claim recites limitations similar to those of independent claim 1, and is rejected for similar reasons. Claim(s) 3-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SAKON (JP 2017182326 A), and further in view of PAN, et al (CN 109829370 A), and further in view of XU ET AL (CN 110443923 A). As per claim 3, SAKON discloses: wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: perform a check-in procedure for the facility when the user is determined to be the user who is allowed to use the facility, (In addition, when confirmation of the user is required at the time of use, such as signing the signature information input unit 33 of the tool main body 30, speaking a predetermined word, touching the fingerprint sensor, etc. Confirmation information is input (S34)); SAKON does not disclose: assign and register a room which can be entered by the user who is determined to be allowed to use the facility when performing the check-in procedure. However, XU et al discloses: "SO-O: the hotel room reservation stage, the user app or hotel reservation website on the subscription, the user such as the camera of mobile phone or computer through a personal terminal device receiving photo upload face image with identity document image, hotel management system, server such as the image geometric normalization, grey scale normalization, size normalization, noise and illumination equalization after pre-treating, human face information extracted feature vector of the human face image in the face feature vector information and identity of certificate photo. and analyzing the similarity of the two so as to face identification comparison according to characteristics, such as similarity can confirm they match up to 70% or 75%. step S1-2: when the guest in the hotel reservation system such as with a reservation and has complete subscription information (e.g., including complete face image and document image), registration check- in guests only need help on the foreground terminal device collects the current human face image by face detecting identifying module extracts the face image characteristic information and reservation system stored in the human face image information in the face database for comparison according to the similarity judging whether it is the same human face. human face image if the subscription information in the human face image matching the current obtained through the configured room and granted by the system based on the access right of the face, at the same time the human face information of the current acquisition associated with the subscription information stored in the face database, and associated with the room information of the distribution" It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to include the above limitations as taught by XU et al in the systems of SAKON, since the claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. As per claim 4, SAKON does not disclose: wherein the at least one processor is configured to assign and register the services available in the facility based on a reservation information previously registered in correspondence with the face of the user who is determined to be allowed to use the facility. However, XU et al discloses: Step S1-2: when the guest in the hotel reservation system such as with a reservation and has complete subscription information (e.g., including complete face image and document image), registration check-in guests only need help on the foreground terminal device collects the current human face image by face detecting identifying module extracts the face image characteristic information and reservation system stored in the human face image information in the face database for comparison according to the similarity judging whether it is the same human face. human face image if the subscription information in the human face image matching the current obtained through the configured room and granted by the system based on the access right of the face, at the same time the human face information of the current acquisition associated with the subscription information stored in the face database, and associated with the room information of the distribution. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to include the above limitations as taught by XU et al in the systems of SAKON, since the claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SAKON (JP 2017182326 A), and further in view of PAN, et al (CN 109829370 A), and further in view of TABATA (JP 2019046124 A). As per claim 5, SAKON does not disclose: Wherein the facility is an accommodation; and the at least one processor is configured to permit at least one of use of a room and a facility of the accommodation, use of an item available in the accommodation, and participation in an event held in the accommodation. However TABATA (JP 2019046124 A) discloses: (In addition, the following situations can be considered for accommodation facilities. In the situation where multiple card keys are issued for the same guest room, if the guest loses one of the card keys, the guest informs the employee that he / she has lost the card key and issues a new card key. Payment for various charges generated afterwards, such as room service. The employee can confirm the current card key usage status by referring to the card key management output screen. In addition to the current counting form, the number of issued sheets and the number of collected sheets may be totaled by time series (daily, monthly, quarterly, yearly, etc.). It is also possible to calculate the collection rate of each guest by counting the number of issued sheets and the number of collected sheets for each guest. Based on the collection rate in a predetermined period, it is also possible to give bonuses such as prizes and points to the guest. In accommodation facilities, the number of card keys in stock is usually limited. For example, the total number of stocks owned by the accommodation facility (total number of card keys lent to guests and card keys not rented to guests) is calculated using an aggregation process, and the number of stocks is less than a predetermined number. In such a case, the management computer 3 may notify the employee and prompt the customer to arrange for a card key (such as an order from a vendor); It should be noted that bonuses for guests based on the collection rate or the number of collected sheets may be given not only based on the totaling result of such a totaling process but also for one stay. For example, in the checkout process, all card keys have been collected, or can be used at the accommodation facility or the affiliated accommodation facility on condition that the card key has been collected at a predetermined collection rate or higher. It is good also as giving a point. Depending on the accommodation facility, advance payment (deposit) may be made for lending the card key. In this case, returning the deposit is equivalent to giving a bonus). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to include the above limitations as taught by TABATA in the systems of SAKON, since the claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see arguments/remarks, filed 12/18/25, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SAKON (JP 2017182326 A), have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made further in view of PAN, et al (CN 109829370 A). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Akiba Robinson whose telephone number is 571-272-6734 and email is Akiba.Robinsonboyce@USPTO.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 6:30am-4:30pm. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner's supervisor, Resha Desai can be reached on 571-270-7792. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system, Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (I N USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist whose telephone number is (703) 305-3900. January 9, 2026 /AKIBA K ROBINSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602711
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PROVIDING EXTERIOR WORK ESTIMATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12518241
SHIPPING CARTON OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12511606
WEARABLE READER DEVICE TECHNOLOGY FOR GUIDING A USER TO LOAD AN ASSET IN AN ASSIGNED LOGISTICS VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12493917
A POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM HAVING A NETWORK OF SMART METERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12482050
ONBOARD VEHICLE SHARING SERVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+23.9%)
5y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 566 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month