Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/825,240

WASTE GAS TREATMENT EQUIPMENT USING HIGH FREQUENCY HEAT SOURCE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Priority
Apr 29, 2024 — TW 113115968
Examiner
SARANTAKOS, KAYLA ROSE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wholetech System Hitech Limited Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allowance Rate
28 granted / 81 resolved
-25.4% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
108
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 81 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-6 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li (TW M635007 U) in view of Blackwell (US 20030175196 A1) in view of JP 3196125 U. Regarding claim 1, Li teaches a waste gas treatment equipment using a high frequency heat source for treating a waste gas and comprising a heating portion for heating waste gas (exhaust gas filtration device that utilizes a high frequency heat source, paragraph [0001]), said heating portion including: a reactor defining a waste gas reaction space for reaction of the waste gas (waste gas reaction space of the reactor, paragraph [0006]), and having a bottom wall (Figure 3 bottom wall “511”, a surrounding wall extending upwardly from said bottom wall (Figure 3 surrounding wall “512”, and a top wall covering a top end of said surrounding wall and cooperating with said bottom wall and said surrounding wall to define said waste gas reaction space (Figure 3 top wall “513”); an induction heating pipe disposed in said waste gas reaction space dividing said waste gas reaction space into an inner space and an outer space (Figure 3 induction heating tube “52” in the middle of exhaust gas reaction space “510”, said inner space being an interior of said induction heating pipe (Figure 3 inner tube “572”), said outer space being located between said induction heating pipe and said surrounding wall (Figure 3 outer tube “573”); a coil protector that is hollow, that is disposed in said outer space of said waste gas reaction space, and that surrounds said induction heating pipe (Figure 3 coil protector “57”); a flow guide tube inserted into said inner space of said waste gas reaction space through said bottom wall of said reactor (Figure 4 separate guide tube “58” runs through the bottom wall “511”), being spaced apart from said top wall of said reactor and an inner peripheral surface of said induction heating pipe (Figure 4 guide tube “58” not touching top wall “513” or heating pipe “52”), and being used for guiding the waste gas from upstream to said inner space of said waste gas reaction space, said induction heating pipe being concentrically disposed between said flow guide tube and said coil protector (Figure 4 heating pipe “52” disposed around guide tube “58” before protector “57”); a high frequency coil disposed in said coil protector and surrounding said induction heating pipe (Figure 4 high frequency coil “53” disposed around heating pipe “52” inside of coil protector “57”_; said high frequency coil being used for generating induced current in said induction heating pipe to cause said induction heating pipe to generate heat for heating the waste gas flowing into said inner space of said waste gas reaction space through said flow guide tube (generate an induced current in the induction heating tube to heat the induction heating tube so as to heat the waste gas through the waste gas reaction space, paragraph [0042]); said coil protector enclosing said high frequency coil to separate said high frequency coil from said induction heating pipe and to simultaneously isolate said high frequency coil from the waste gas (coil protector covers the high frequency coil to separate coil from the heating tube an separate the coil from the exhaust gas, paragraph [0043]), but does not teach a catalyst barrel having a barrel body that is a hollow tubular body, that is sleeved on a top portion of said flow guide tube, and that includes an inner wall abutting against said flow guide tube, an outer wall radially spaced apart from said inner wall and provided with a plurality of through holes communicating with said inner space of said waste gas reaction space, and bottom wall connected to bottom ends of said inner wall and said outer wall and cooperating with said inner wall and said outer wall to define a receiving space that communicates with said inner space through said through holes and that is adapted to receive a catalyst, said through holes being configured to allow entry of the waste gas into said receiving space of said barrel body so as to react with said catalyst and reduce the reaction temperature of the waste gas to thereby reduce the power of high frequence alternating current used by said high frequency coil, or a scrapper mechanism including an inner scraper inserted into said flow guide tube and surrounded by an inner wall surface of said flow guide tube, an outer scraper inserted into said induction heating pipe and located between said outer wall of said barrel body and said inner peripheral surface of said induction heating pipe, and a drive member connected to said inner scraper and said outer scraper for driving said inner scraper and said outer scraper to rotate therewith, said scraper mechanism being configured to scrape dust or crystals attached to said inner wall surface of said flow guide tube and said outer wall of said barrel body. However, Blackwell teaches teach a catalyst barrel having a barrel body that is a hollow tubular body (Figure 2 cylindrical catalyst “1”), that is sleeved on a top portion of said flow guide tube (Figure 2 catalyst “1” disposed in guided path of waste gas “6”), and that includes an inner wall abutting against said flow guide tube (Figure 3 gas permeable cylinder “10”), an outer wall radially spaced apart from said inner wall and provided with a plurality of through holes communicating with said inner space of said waste gas reaction space (Figure 3 annular passage “13” for reactant “6” entry radially outward from gas permeable cylinder “10”), and bottom wall connected to bottom ends of said inner wall (Figure 3 gas-impermeable annular shoulder “11”) and said outer wall and cooperating with said inner wall and said outer wall to define a receiving space that communicates with said inner space through said through holes and that is adapted to receive a catalyst (Figure 3 catalyst “1” located between annular passage “9” and gas permeable cylinder “10”) , said through holes being configured to allow entry of the waste gas into said receiving space of said barrel body so as to react with said catalyst and reduce the reaction temperature of the waste gas to thereby reduce the power of high frequence alternating current used by said high frequency coil (reactants enter passage and pass radially through gas permeable cylinder and product exit through the gas permeable wall of cylinder, paragraph [0035], and catalyst possess the characteristics of having an electrical conduction path long enough to be inductively heated at lower frequency, paragraph [0015]), but does not teach a scrapper mechanism including an inner scraper inserted into said flow guide tube and surrounded by an inner wall surface of said flow guide tube, an outer scraper inserted into said induction heating pipe and located between said outer wall of said barrel body and said inner peripheral surface of said induction heating pipe, and a drive member connected to said inner scraper and said outer scraper for driving said inner scraper and said outer scraper to rotate therewith, said scraper mechanism being configured to scrape dust or crystals attached to said inner wall surface of said flow guide tube and said outer wall of said barrel body. However, JP 3196125 U teaches a scrapper mechanism including an inner scraper inserted into said flow guide tube and surrounded by an inner wall surface of said flow guide tube (Figure 2 scraper “222” comprises first scraping portion “223” to scrape inside of reaction furnace “2211”) an outer scraper inserted into said induction heating pipe and located between said outer wall of said barrel body and said inner peripheral surface of said induction heating pipe (Figure 2 scraper “22” comprises second scraping portion “224” to scrape outside of reaction furnace “2212”), and a drive member connected to said inner scraper and said outer scraper for driving said inner scraper and said outer scraper to rotate therewith (rotary unit configured to rotate the first and second scraping portions, paragraph [0018]), said scraper mechanism being configured to scrape dust or crystals attached to said inner wall surface of said flow guide tube and said outer wall of said barrel body (scrape off the crystals adhering to the first and second reaction surfaces, paragraph [0018]). Li and JP 3196125 U are considered analogous to the current invention because all are in the field of exhaust gas treatment devices. Additionally, Blackwell is considered analogous to the current invention because both are in the field of induction heated catalyzed gas reactors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the exhaust gas treatment device taught by Li with the catalyst barrel taught by Blackwell because Blackwell teaches the structural form of the catalyst facilitates efficient direct induction heating of the catalyst in a uniform manner, paragraph [0014]). Additionally, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the exhaust gas treatment device taught by Li with the scraper taught by JP 3196125 U because JP 3196125 U teaches that the scraper will advantageously scrape off the crystalline biproducts that adhere to the reactor surface, paragraph [0017]). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches all aspects of the current invention including wherein said coil protector includes: a lower ring plate disposed on said bottom wall of said reactor (Figure 3 lower ring plate “571”, Li); an inner tube extending upwardly from an inner periphery of said lower ring plate and located between said high frequency coil and said induction heating pipe (Figure 3 inner tube “572” between coil “53” and heat pipe “52”, Li); an outer tube extending upwardly from an outer periphery of said lower ring plate (Figure 3 outer tube “573”, Li); and an upper ring plate connected to top ends of said outer tube and said inner tube and cooperating with said lower ring plate, said inner tube, and said outer tube to enclose said high frequency coil so as to isolate said high frequency coil from the waste gas (Figure 3 upper ring plate “574” encloses high frequency coil “53” in coil accommodating space “579”, Li). Regarding claim 3, the combination of Li Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches wherein said heating portion further includes a thermal insulation unit covering an outer surface of said surrounding wall of said reactor and configured to prevent heat from escaping to the outside of said reactor through surrounding wall (heat insulation unit covers the outer surface of the reaction furnace to prevent heat from escaping, paragraph [0045], Li). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches wherein a material of said coil protector is one of a high nickel alloy and a ceramic (coil protection may be a ceramic or Hastelloy, paragraph [0043], Li). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches wherein a material of said induction heating pipe is one of graphite and conductive metal (heating tube can be graphite or conductive metal, paragraph [0041], Li). Regarding claim 6, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches wherein said catalyst is an organic gas catalyst (reacting a lower alkane in the presence of a platinum group metal catalyst, paragraph [0015], Blackwell). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches wherein said catalyst further has a top cover detachably disposed on top of said barrel body and including a cylindrical portion inserted into a top end of said flow guide tube, and an annular flange portion extending outwardly and radially from a top periphery of said cylindrical portion and covering a top opening of said barrel body (Figure 3 cylinder “10” is closed at the top by gas impermeable lid “12”, Blackwell). Claims 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U in view of Taniguchi (US 20100135864 A1). Regarding claim 7, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches all aspects of the current invention except wherein the catalyst is a fluorine-containing catalyst. However, Tada teaches wherein the catalyst is a fluorine-containing catalyst (titanium oxide photocatalyst containing fluorine, abstract). Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U are considered analogous to the current invention as discussed above. Taniguchi is considered analogous to the current invention because both are in the field of catalyzed gas reactors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the waste gas purification device taught by Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U with the fluorine-containing catalyst as taught by Taniguchi because Taniguchi teaches that the combination of fluorine with a titanium oxide photocatalyst improves the odorous component decomposition rate (paragraph [0048]). Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U in view of Shi (CN 117919935 A). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches all aspects of the current invention except wherein said outer scraper has two spaced apart vertical scraping rods connected to said drive member and a connecting ring connected to bottom ends of said vertical scraping rods. However, Shi teaches except wherein said outer scraper has two spaced apart vertical scraping rods connected to said drive member (two or more scrapers arranged in an array along the circumference of the filter plate, paragraph [0009]) and a connecting ring connected to bottom ends of said vertical scraping rods (Figure 6 baffle “25” rotatably mounted to the bottom of scraper “24”). Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U are considered analogous to the current invention as discussed above. Shi is considered analogous to the current invention because both are in the field of waste gas treatment devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the waste gas treatment device taught by Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U with the scraper arrangement of Shi because Shi teaches such a scraper arrangement effectively reduces the accumulation of the calcium sulfate on the walls of the reaction chamber (paragraph [0017]). Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U in view of Duan (US 20170268396 A1). Regarding claim 10, the combination of Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches all aspects of the current invention except wherein said outer scraper is a helical scraping rod extending helically downward from said drive member. However, Duan teaches wherein said outer scraper is a helical scraping waste gas treatment devices rod extending helically downward from said drive member (helical shovel rotates to push dirt stored at the bottom of the chamber towards the sludge discharge, paragraph [0052]). Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U teaches all aspects of the current invention as discussed above. Duan is considered analogous to the current invention because both are in the field of gas purification devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the waste gas treatment device taught by Li, Blackwell, and JP 3196125 U with the scraper arrangement of Duan because Duan teaches the helical shovel advantageously allows for continuous increase of a pressure to force the dirt to be discharged from the chamber (paragraph [0051]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAYLA ROSE SARANTAKOS whose telephone number is (703)756-5524. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Marcheschi can be reached at (571) 272-1374. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.R.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1799 /DONALD R SPAMER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691197
Germicidal Lighting Fixture Using Photocatalytic Oxidation
4y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678523
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DISINFECTION
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674592
AIR CLEANER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667809
AIR PURIFIER WITH AIR TREATMENT BASKET
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12629440
STERILIZATION APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+49.8%)
3y 7m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 81 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month