Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/825,326

ARCHITECTURAL FINS AND METHODS OF INSTALLING THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Priority
Sep 06, 2023 — provisional 63/580,918
Examiner
FORD, GISELE D
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Norbec Architectural Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
610 granted / 873 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
909
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.8%
+39.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 873 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 7-9 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 05/08/2026. The particulars of the method steps are not required of the apparatus claims as outlined in the restriction requirement of 03/09/2026. The examiner has performed a search for the apparatus, and a further search will be required for the additional features of the method claim limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Braybrook, U.S. Patent Application Publication. Regarding claim 1, Braybrook discloses a louver assembly comprising: a fastening portion (16) comprising a rear wall (52) having a rear middle portion (center of 52) configured to abut a cladding panel (should the vertical support mullion be clad with a panel, paragraph 4), the middle portion being configured to receive securing means for securing the rear wall to the cladding panel (as it abuts the mullion and is planar), and two side portions (distal edge portions of 52) at opposite edges of the middle portion; two rear side walls (50) extending outwardly from the side portions of the rear wall; a front portion (18) for installing onto the fastening portion comprising: a front middle portion (22); two front side walls extending from opposite edges of the front middle portion (sidewall portions of 18), the front side walls configured to receive the rear side walls therebetween (see Fig. 2A); and wherein the front side walls are configured to extend to abut the cladding panel (at 42). The phrases “configured to abut a cladding panel,” “configured to receive securing means for securing the rear wall to the cladding panel,” “for installing onto the fastening portion,” “configured to receive the rear side walls therebetween,” and “configured to extend to abut the cladding panel” are statements of intended use of the claimed invention and must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Regarding claim 4, Braybrook discloses a louver system wherein the fastening portion and the front portion are configured to be secured to each other using screws (in the same manner as shown in Fig. 5). The phrase “configured to be secured” is a statement of intended use of the claimed invention and must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Regarding claim 6, Baybrook discloses a louver system comprising two or more accent fins according to claim 1 (see Fig. 5), the two or more accent fins having a each a respective bottom end adjacent to respective top end of another of the two or more accent fins (Fig. 5), further comprising at least one guidepiece (348) for securing said two or more accent fins to each other by connecting said respective top end and bottom end. The phrase “for securing said two or more accent fins to each other by connecting said respective top end and bottom end” is a statement of intended use of the claimed invention and must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 5 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GISELE D FORD whose telephone number is (571)270-7326. The examiner can normally be reached M-T,Th-F 7:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GISELE D. FORD Examiner Art Unit 3633 /GISELE D FORD/Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679541
PASSENGER CUBICLE ASSEMBLY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668981
BUILDING PANEL WITH A MECHANICAL LOCKING SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662839
SUPPORT POLE AND OUTDOOR LIGHTING ASSEMBLY COMPRISING THE SAME
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662807
CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM FOR ERECTING HIGH-RISE LOAD-BEARING FRAME STRUCTURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662814
GRID OF PROFILES AND METHOD FOR DISMOUNTING A GRID OF PROFILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+13.1%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 873 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month