Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/825,439

Modular Multi-Stage Antenna System and Component for Wireless Communications

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Examiner
LOTTER, DAVID E
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ignion S L
OA Round
1 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
493 granted / 584 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 584 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 16/731,755, filed on 12/31/2019. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 4 and 7 both recite the limitation “The multi-section antenna of claim…” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The claims should read “The multi-section antenna component further includes....” Allowable Subject Matter As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Claims 1-3, 5-6, and 8-20 allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding independent claim 1, patentability exists, at least in part, with the claimed features of a multi-section antenna component fabricated in a single piece, comprising: a first section including a radiation booster; and a second section including at least one of: a radiating element or a plurality of radiation boosters; the multi-section antenna component has a maximum size greater than 1/30 times a free-space wavelength corresponding to a lowest frequency of operation of the multi-section antenna component, the maximum size being smaller than ⅕ times the free-space wavelength, and a thickness of the multi-section antenna component is within the range 1/60 and 1/45000 times the free-space wavelength. Andujar Linares (US 2016/0285166) and Anguera Pros (US 2014/0015730) are both cited as teaching some elements of the claimed invention including a multi-section antenna component, a first section including a radiation booster; and a second section including at least one of: a radiating element or a plurality of radiation boosters. However, the prior art, when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion This is a continuation of applicant's earlier Applications No. 17/947,470 and 18/490,104. All claims are drawn to the same invention claimed in the earlier application and could have been finally rejected on the grounds and art of record in the next Office action if they had been entered in the earlier application. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL even though it is a first action in this case. See MPEP § 706.07(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no, however, event will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E LOTTER whose telephone number is (571)270-7422. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached on 571-272-2105. The ax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID E. LOTTER Primary Examiner Art Unit 2845 /DAVID E LOTTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597705
SPACE-WAVE PHASE-SHIFTING ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597701
BASE STATION ANTENNAS HAVING F-STYLE ARRAYS THAT GENERATE ANTENNA BEAMS HAVING NARROWED AZIMUTH BEAMWIDTHS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596143
OVER THE AIR (OTA) TESTING OF AN ANTENNA IN PACKAGE (AIP) DEVICE IN RADIATING NEAR FIELD USING A CHARACTERIZING DEVICE AND AUTOMATED TEST EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597707
ANTENNA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592475
ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 584 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month