Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/825,925

ULTRA-HIGH STRENGTH HOT-ROLLED STEEL WITH TOUGHNESS AND METHOD OF FABRICATING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Priority
May 26, 2023 — divisional of 12/104,232
Examiner
KRUPICKA, ADAM C
Art Unit
1784
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Big River Steel LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
470 granted / 762 resolved
-3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
808
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.9%
+38.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 762 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed November 18, 2024 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. The listed US Patents have been considered, however the non-patent literature documents listed have been struck through and have not been considered because the non-patent document entries in the application file do not contain any text of the documents. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (PGPub US 2017/0275719). Regarding applicants’ claim 1, Wang et al. disclose a hot-rolled steel sheet with a yield strength of 800 MPa or more, the steel comprising (in weight percent) at least: 0.02 to 0.05% carbon, generally 1.5 to 2.5% Mn, 0.02 to 0.10% aluminum, 0.01 to 0.03% titanium, 0.03 to 0.06% niobium + titanium, and 0.1 to 0.5% chromium, a balance of iron and unavoidable impurities. Wang et al. do not appear to disclose the exact ranges claimed, however the values disclosed overlap the claimed values. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of applicants’ claimed invention would have found it obvious to select values from within those disclosed by Wang et al. including values which fall within the claimed proportions. With regards to the manganese content, Wang et al. disclose that the lower limit is generally controlled to be 1.5% or higher (paragraph 0015). ‘Generally’ is considered to be similar to ‘about’, that is, it is usually kept at 1.5% or higher but open to values outside the value of 1.5 (i.e. the lower limit is not absolute) and therefore overlaps the claimed upper limit of less than 1.5%. While ‘generally’ 1.5% is considered to overlap applicants’ claimed upper limit of less than 1.5%, it is also so close to applicants’ claimed range that a prima facia case of obviousness is established (MPEP 21144.05) Regarding applicants claim 2, Wang et al. disclose an impact toughness of 100J or higher at -80ºC (paragraph 0006), which exceeds the specification claimed by applicants. Where the steel of Wang et al. has an impact toughness of 100J or more at -80ºC it would be expected to exhibit an impact toughness of at least 25J at -40ºC as claimed. Regarding applicants claim 3, Wang et al. disclose thickness values of 3 to 12 mm (paragraph 0041) which falls within the claimed range of less than 20mm. Regarding applicants claim 4, Wang et al. disclose yield strengths of 800 MPa or more (paragraph 0041), which falls within the claimed range. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM C KRUPICKA whose telephone number is (571)270-7086. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at (571)272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Adam Krupicka/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637741
MAGNESIUM ALLOY AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642091
BONDED BODY, CERAMIC-COPPER CIRCUIT BOARD, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12617182
MULTILAYER SUBSTRATE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611704
STEEL PIPE FOR LINE PIPE WITH EXCELLENT LOW TEMPERATURE TOUGHNESS OF WELDED ZONE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12594695
INJECTION MOLD INSERT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR INJECTION MOLD INSERT
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+27.9%)
3y 3m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 762 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month