Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/826,053

Ice Scratcher

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Priority
Aug 31, 2023 — provisional 63/579,817
Examiner
LEE, MATTHEW D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
192 granted / 215 resolved
+29.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
232
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
68.0%
+28.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 215 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Application Status Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined in this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-10 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claims 4-5, 8, and 19, the term, “the rear suspension” lacks proper antecedent basis. In claim 7, the term, “the mount” lacks proper antecedent basis. In claim 9, the recitation of a “third portion” and “third surface” makes it unclear if the applicant intended to also recite a first and second portion and a first and second surface. Regarding claim 10, it is unclear to what degree an arm must be bent to be considered, “sufficiently bent”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 11-18 are allowed. Claims 4-10 and 19-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 1, 11, and 19, the closest prior art made of record is Laugen (US 20240043076 A1). Laugen discloses a snowmobile (30, Fig. 1) fitted with an ice scratcher (33) assembly comprising: a coiled structure (83, Fig. 7), a scratcher end (38) connected to the coiled structure via an arm (63). The “hand structure” of claims 1, 11, and 19 is known at least from Bedard (US 20150034403 A1) and is illustrated at 166 in Figure 5. None of the cited art teaches or renders obvious the hand structure being interconnected to a second portion of the base by a joint, wherein the joint is configured to receive at least one rotating component that when coupled to the at least one joint provides a rotational axis that is colinear with the first axis of the at least one joint. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and discloses ice scratchers for snowmobiles and vehicles having means for removing ice from roads in general. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Matthew D Lee whose telephone number is (571)272-6087. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Fri. (7:30 - 5:00 EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Olszewski can be reached at (571) 272-2706. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW D LEE/ Examiner, Art Unit 3617 /JOHN OLSZEWSKI/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679152
Mobility Scooter Tow Arrangement
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668188
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLEANING DIRTY ARTICLES IN VEHICLES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662211
STRADDLE-TYPE VEHICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662180
Control method for stair climber
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636952
WORK VEHICLE WITH ELECTRIC TRANSAXLE AND TRANSFER SHAFT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.4%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 215 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month