Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/826,651

SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVED BACTERIAL AND MICROBIAL REDUCTION, EQUIPMENT COMPRISING SAID SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF UTILIZING SAID SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT TO IMPROVE BACTERIAL AND MICROBIAL REDUCTION ON FOODS, FOOD PRODUCTS, AND PRODUCE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 06, 2024
Priority
Sep 07, 2023 — provisional 63/537,157
Examiner
SARANTAKOS, KAYLA ROSE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Cleanworks Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
34%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 34% of cases
34%
Career Allowance Rate
27 granted / 79 resolved
-25.8% vs TC avg
Strong +55% interview lift
Without
With
+54.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
108
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
92.0%
+52.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 79 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitations "the vine" and “the field” in line 1 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-12 and 14 are rejected based on their dependence on claim 1, Claim 13 recites the limitation "the group" in line 1 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 recites the limitations "the hydroxyl-radical treatment" in line 2 of the claim, “the hydrogen peroxide mist” in line 3 of the claim, “the ozone gas” in line 3 of the claim, and “the one or more UV-C lamps” in line 4 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 16-20 are rejected based on their dependence one claim 15. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 15 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-14 and 16-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1 and 15, the closest prior art is Moyer (US 20180303133 A1). Moyer teaches inactivating bacteria in food products using UV-C light, hydrogen peroxide, and ozone. However, Moyer fails to teach a movable frame defining a processing chamber and the processing chamber is movable over and/or along the produce on the vine or in the field. Claims 2-14, and 16-20 also contains allowable subject matter based on their dependence on claims 1 and 15 respectively. The prior art as a whole does not teach the claimed invention within the claim environment. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAYLA ROSE SARANTAKOS whose telephone number is (703)756-5524. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Marcheschi can be reached at (571) 272-1374. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.R.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1799 /DONALD R SPAMER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678523
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DISINFECTION
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674592
AIR CLEANER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667809
AIR PURIFIER WITH AIR TREATMENT BASKET
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12629440
STERILIZATION APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622990
STERILIZATION OF TESTING EQUIPMENT
4y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
34%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+54.7%)
3y 7m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 79 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month