Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/827,269

Kinase Inhibitors

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Sep 06, 2024
Priority
Sep 08, 2023 — provisional 63/537,341
Examiner
SHIAO, REI TSANG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
INCYTE Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1649 granted / 2066 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -34% lift
Without
With
+-33.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
2087
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2066 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Priority and Status of Claims 1. This application claims benefit of the provisional application: 63537341 09/08/2023. 2. Claims 1-43 are pending in the application. Double Patenting 3. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. See In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this application. See 37 CFR 1.130(b). Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-43 are provisionally rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 and 46 of Burns et al. co-pending application No. 18/827,205, or see Burns et al. US 2025/0092043 A1. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other and reasons are as follows. Applicant claim a compound/composition of formula (I), i.e., PNG media_image1.png 384 540 media_image1.png Greyscale , wherein R1 is phenyl or indazolyl, R2 is alkyl, R3 is hydrogen or halo, Rc4 and Rd4 is hydrogen, alkyl or cycloalkyl, or Rc4 and Rd4 together with the N atom to which they are attached form a heterocycloalkyl group, see claim 1. Dependent claims 2-43 further limit the scope of compounds, i.e., specific variablesR1-R3 and Rc4 and Rd4, specific compounds, and methods of use for treating cancer. Burns et al. ‘205 claims a compound of formula (I), i.e., PNG media_image2.png 272 544 media_image2.png Greyscale , wherein R1, R2 and R4 is hydrogen, alkyl or Cycloalkyl; R3 is aryl or heteroaryl; X1 is -CH2-, L is PNG media_image3.png 76 124 media_image3.png Greyscale , and E is Heterocycloalky, see claim 1. Burns et al. ‘205 compounds are used for treating cancer. The difference between instant claims and Burns et al. ‘205 is that the instant claim is embraced within the scope of Burns et al. ‘205. One having ordinary skill in the art would find the claims 1-43 prima facie obvious because one would be motivated to employ the compound of Burns et al. ‘205 to obtain instant invention. The motivation to make the claimed compounds derived from the known compounds of Burns et al. ‘205 would possess similar activity to that which is claimed in the reference. This is a provisional obviousness-type double patenting rejection because the conflicting claims have not in fact been patented. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REI TSANG SHIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-0707. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Claytor can be reached on 571-272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REI TSANG SHIAO/ Rei-tsang Shiao, Ph.D.Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1691 August 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747241
COMPOUNDS FOR TARGETING DEGRADATION OF BRUTON'S TYROSINE KINASE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742193
Heterologous Carotenoid Production in Microorganisms
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740958
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS USING AT LEAST ONE GLYCINE OR DERIVATIVE THEREOF AND AT LEAST ONE LARGE NEUTRAL AMINO ACID AND/OR CATIONIC AMINO ACID OR PRECURSOR THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741975
FUSED POLYCYCLIC SUBSTITUTED 5-CARBOXYLIC ACID THIENOPYRIMIDINE DIONE COMPOUND AND USE THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735412
SMALL MOLECULE ANTAGONISTS FOR THE RELAXIN-3/RXFP3 SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (-33.6%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2066 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month