Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/827,570

HANDHELD ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 06, 2024
Priority
Jan 19, 2024 — provisional 63/623,200 +1 more
Examiner
ZIMMERMAN, BRIAN A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
16%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
33%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 16% of cases
16%
Career Allowance Rate
5 granted / 31 resolved
-43.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
36
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
80.4%
+40.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 31 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3,5,6,8-11,15-189 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moore (20250224785) in view of Lan (12046530). Regarding claim 1, Moore shows a mobile phone [0010] that includes a display and a battery (abstract). The phone includes a front and rear housing (110 and 103). Moore has a chassis assembly 112, circuit board 104 and thermal layer 112c bridging the circuit board and the chassis and cover areas. Moore doesn’t teach through holes in the thermal layer where the holes interrupt heat flow. Lan teaches holes in the thermal bridge of a circuit board. The through holes interrupt the thermal path to use Copper Bumps for mitigation. See col 3 lines 5-15. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have holes in the thermal bridge of Moore as taught by Lan to improve handling of heat. Regarding claim 2, Moore shows a circuit board with a processor 106 mounted on a first surface. The battery is part of the chassis assembly with creates a thermal bridge and is connected to the circuit board 104. Regarding claim 3, Moore’s chassis creates a thermal bridge that couples regions of the chassis. Regarding claim 5, the circuit board and the battery are on the same side of the chassis which acts as the claimed thermal bridge. Regarding claim 6, the thermal diffuser layer of Mooer is graphite. Paragraph [0018] Regarding claim 8, Moore shows an enclosure for a portable electronic device that has a front and rear housing (110 and 103). Moore has a chassis assembly 112, circuit board 104 and thermal layer 112c bridging the circuit board and the chassis and cover areas. Moore doesn’t teach through holes in the thermal layer where the holes interrupt heat flow. Lan teaches holes in the thermal bridge of a circuit board. The through holes interrupt the thermal path to use Copper Bumps for mitigation. See col 3 lines 5-15. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have holes in the thermal bridge of Moore as taught by Lan to improve handling of heat. Regarding claim 9, Moore includes a battery as claimed (108). Regarding claim 10, Moore multiple exterior surfaces since the housing is a three-dimensional box. The examiner takes official notice that since the device 100 is a phone, it inherently includes a circuit that includes a wireless communication circuit. Additionally, the phone housing would inherently include an antenna to communicate as a mobile phone. Regarding claim 11, Moore further includes a display as discussed in paragraph [0010]. Inherently there would be a frame support for such a display to exist inside the phone housing. Lan teaches holes in the thermal bridge of a circuit board. The through holes interrupt the thermal path to use Copper Bumps for mitigation. See col 3 lines 5-15. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have holes in the thermal bridge of Moore as taught by Lan to improve handling of heat. Regarding claim 15, Moore shows a thermal chassis for an electronic device. Moore teaches a housing that includes a front cover (110, that includes a display [0015]) and a rear cover (103). Moore includes a circuit board that is connected to the chassis assembly. Moore also includes a battery (108) connected to the chassis. Moore shows a Thermal diffuser 112 to transfer heat. Regarding claim 16, the thermal diffuser is for spreading heat. Regarding claim 17, the thermal diffuser is made of graphite. See paragraph [0018]. Regarding claim 18, Lan teaches holes in the thermal bridge of a circuit board. The through holes interrupt the thermal path to use Copper Bumps for mitigation. See col 3 lines 5-15. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have holes in the thermal bridge of Moore as taught by Lan to improve handling of heat. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4,7,12-14,19 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN A ZIMMERMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3059. The examiner can normally be reached m,t,tr 6-4; w,f 6-noon. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN A ZIMMERMAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2686
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674691
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A SPATIALLY AWARE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668340
MARINE VESSEL
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12612033
HITCH ASSIST TRAILER, COUPLER AND HITCHBALL DETECTION AND TRACKING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12505731
METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING ALARM RELIABILITY OF SMOKE FIRE DETECTOR
1y 6m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12415534
VEHICLE SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
16%
Grant Probability
33%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 31 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month